Karl V. Wendell, III v. Westmoreland County and VML Insurance Programs

0120112Vactapp

Full text

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA
Present: 	Judges Frank, Alston and Senior Judge Coleman
KARL V. WENDELL, III
MEMORANDUM OPINION*
v. 	Record No. 0120-11-2 	PER CURIAM
MAY 17, 2011
WESTMORELAND COUNTY AND
VML INSURANCE PROGRAMS
FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION
(James Monroe; Law Office of James Monroe, PLC, on brief), for
appellant.
(Robert A. Rapaport; Bonnie P. Lane; Clarke, Dolph, Rapaport, Hull,
Brunick & Garriott, P.L.C., on brief), for appellees.
* Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication.
Karl V. Wendell, III appeals a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission
finding he was not entitled to benefits because his injury did not arise out of and in the course of
his employment and he was not on a special errand at the time of his injury. We have reviewed
the record and the commission’s opinion and find that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the commission in its final opinion. See Wendell v.
Westmoreland (County of), VWC File No. VA000-0006-5650 (Dec. 21, 2010). We dispense
with oral argument and summarily affirm because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27.
Affirmed.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.