0120112•Karl V. Wendell, III v. Westmoreland County and VML Insurance Programs
Full text
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Judges Frank, Alston and Senior Judge Coleman KARL V. WENDELL, III MEMORANDUM OPINION* v. Record No. 0120-11-2 PER CURIAM MAY 17, 2011 WESTMORELAND COUNTY AND VML INSURANCE PROGRAMS FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION (James Monroe; Law Office of James Monroe, PLC, on brief), for appellant. (Robert A. Rapaport; Bonnie P. Lane; Clarke, Dolph, Rapaport, Hull, Brunick & Garriott, P.L.C., on brief), for appellees. * Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication. Karl V. Wendell, III appeals a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission finding he was not entitled to benefits because his injury did not arise out of and in the course of his employment and he was not on a special errand at the time of his injury. We have reviewed the record and the commission’s opinion and find that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the commission in its final opinion. See Wendell v. Westmoreland (County of), VWC File No. VA000-0006-5650 (Dec. 21, 2010). We dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27. Affirmed.
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.