Richmond Paperboard Company, et al. v. Edward J. Bailey

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA
Present: 	Chief Judge Fitzpatrick, Judges Frank and Clements
RICHMOND PAPERBOARD CORPORATION AND
RELIANCE NATIONAL INDEMNITY
COMPANY IN LIQUIDATION
MEMORANDUM OPINION*
v. 	Record No. 0715-04-2 	PER CURIAM
AUGUST 3, 2004
EDWARD J. BAILEY
FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION
(S. Vernon Priddy III; Cecil H. Creasey, Jr.; Sands Anderson
Marks & Miller, on briefs), for appellants.
(Edward J. Bailey, Sr., pro se, on brief).
* Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication.
Richmond Paperboard Corporation and its insurer (hereinafter referred to as “employer”)
appeal a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission holding employer responsible for
medical treatment of Edward J. Bailey’s seizures. Employer contends the commission erred in
finding that (1) claimant proved his seizures and related treatment were causally related to his
compensable July 28, 1994 head injury; and (2) his claim for medical treatment of the seizures
was not barred by the statute of limitations provided under Code § 65.2-601. We have reviewed
the record and the commission’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the commission in its final opinion. See Bailey v. Richmond
Paperboard Corporation, VWC File No. 170-99-54 (Feb. 24, 2004). We dispense with oral
argument and summarily affirm because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

- 2 -
in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process. See Code
§ 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27.
Affirmed.