80008-6•State Of Washington, Respondent V. Karl Duzell, Appellant
Full text
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION ONE In the Matter of the Detention of ) No. 80008-6-I K.D. ) UNPUBLISHED OPINION ) __________________________________ ) FILED: MAR 1 6 2020 PER CURIAM — K.D. appeals an order committing him for up to 14 days of involuntary treatment. K.D. was released from his commitment in May, 2019. He contends, and the State concedes, that the order must be vacated because the court entered insufficient findings to support revocation. ~ In the Matter of the Detention of G.D., — Wn.App.2d —, 450 P.3d 668 (2019) (boilerplate findings insufficient to permit meaningful review of determination that appellant presented a likelihood of serious harm to herself). The State does not dispute K.D.’s argument that the evidence was insufficient to prove that he was not a good faith voluntary patient, and does not seek a remand for entry of additional findings. Accordingly, we accept the concession of error and remand solely for an order vacating the order of commitment and dismissing the petition. FORTHECOURT: _______________________ / /
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.