State Of Washington, Respondent V. Jose Beltran Rodriguez, Appellant

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON
DIVISION II
STATE OF WASHINGTON, No. 59131-6-II
Respondent,
v.
JOSE BELTRAN RODRIGUEZ, UNPUBLISHED OPINION
Appellant.
GLASGOW, J.—While confined at a facility operated by the Washington State Department
of Children, Youth, and Families (the Department), Jose Beltran Rodriguez was with a group of
youth that began fighting another group of youth within the facility. Rodriguez was charged and
convicted of prison riot. Rodriguez appealed his conviction.1
On April 25, 2025, the governor signed into law a bill that retroactively changed the
definition of “correctional institution” in the prison riot context, expressly excluding facilities
operated by the Department. ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE H.B. 1815, § 1(b), 69th Leg., Reg. Sess.
(Wash. 2025). The State immediately submitted a motion to this court for accelerated review and
immediate reversal of Rodriguez’s prison riot conviction because Rodriguez was not at a
“correctional institution” during the events underlying his charge. Id. Rodriguez has not objected
to this resolution of his appeal.
1 Although Rodriguez was being confined in a facility for youth, he was over 18 years old when
this incident occurred. Clerk’s Papers (CP) at 20 (reflecting Rodriquez’s date of birth in March
2005); CP at 7 (reflecting date of the incident in June 2023).
Filed
Washington State
Court of Appeals
Division Two
April 29, 2025

No. 59131-6-II
2
Because Rodriguez was not at a correctional institution during the events underlying his
charge, which is an essential element of prison riot, we grant the motion for accelerated review
and reverse. We vacate Rodriguez’s conviction. We remove this case from the May 13 oral
argument docket. We also order this court’s clerk to accelerate the mandate and issue it as soon as
possible.
FACTS
In June 2023, Rodriguez was confined at Green Hill School, which is a facility that houses
youth and young adults operated by the Department. Rodriguez was in a group of youth who ran
out of a building and began fighting with another group. A staff member “observed punches being
thrown” and “grabbed the closest member of the group to him,” who was Rodriguez. Clerk’s
Papers at 12 (Findings of Fact 1.8, 1.9).
The State charged Rodriguez with prison riot under RCW 9.94.010. Rodriguez was
convicted and sentenced to one year and one day. Rodriguez timely appealed his conviction and
sentence. Rodriguez argued that the prison riot statute was unconstitutional and he claimed that
insufficient evidence supported his conviction.
ANALYSIS
Based on recent changes to the prison riot statute, the State moves for accelerated review
and immediate reversal of Rodriguez’s conviction and remand for resentencing. The State asks
this court to vacate the prison riot conviction and issue the mandate immediately.
Under Washington’s prison riot statute,
[w]henever two or more inmates of a correctional institution assemble for any
purpose, and act in such a manner as to disturb the good order of the institution and
contrary to the commands of the officers of the institution, by the use of force or

No. 59131-6-II
3
violence, or the threat thereof, and whether acting in concert or not, they shall be
guilty of prison riot.
RCW 9.94.010(1) (emphasis added).
At the time of Rodriguez’s conviction, “correctional institution[s]” included facilities
operated by the Department. Former RCW 9.94.049(1) (2021). On April 25, 2025, the governor
signed into law a bill that excluded facilities operated by the Department from the definition of
“correctional institution[s]” in the prison riot context. ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE H.B. 1815, § 1,
69th Leg., Reg. Sess. (Wash. 2025). The legislature included language in the bill that this change
was effective immediately and that it applied retroactively to all prison riot convictions that were
charged within five years before April 25, 2025. ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE H.B. 1815, §§ 6-7, 69th
Leg., Reg. Sess. (Wash. 2025).
Rodriguez was convicted of prison riot in November 2023 for events that occurred while
he was confined at Green Hill School, which is operated by the Department. Thus, under the new
retroactive statute, he was not an inmate at a “correctional institution,” which is an essential
element of prison riot. Accordingly, we reverse Rodriguez’s conviction.
CONCLUSION
We grant the State’s motion to accelerate this appeal. We reverse and vacate Rodriguez’s
conviction. We remove this case from the May 13 oral argument docket. We direct the clerk of
this court to issue the mandate immediately under RAP 12.5(b).

No. 59131-6-II
4
A majority of the panel having determined that this opinion will not be printed in the
Washington Appellate Reports, but will be filed for public record in accordance with RCW 2.06.040,
it is so ordered.
GLASGOW, J.
We concur:
MAXA, P.J.
LEE, J.