State Of Washington, Respondent V. Micah Patlan Snyder, Appellant

82564-0WashctappNov 1, 2021

Open source

Full text

Citations and pin cites are based on the Westlaw online version of the cited material.
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON
STATE OF WASHINGTON,
Respondent,
v.
MICAH PATLAN SNYDER,
Appellant.
No. 82564-0-I
DIVISION ONE
UNPUBLISHED OPINION
P ER CURIAM — Micah Snyder appeals his convictions for two counts of third
degree domestic violence assault. He contends, and the State concedes, that the
portion of his judgment and sentence ordering him to provide a DNA1 sample should be
stricken because he had already provided a sample pursuant to prior felony convictions.
RCW 43.43.754(4) (“If the Washington state patrol crime laboratory already has a DNA
sample from an individual for a qualifying offense, a subsequent submission is not
required to be submitted.”); State v. Houck, 9 Wn. App. 2d 636, 651 n.4, 446 P.3d 646
(2019); State v. Van Wolvelaere, 8 Wn. App. 2d 705, 710, 440 P.3d 1005 (2019).
We accept the State’s concession and remand to the trial court for a ministerial
order striking the order to submit a DNA sample.
1 Deoxyribonucleic acid.
No. 82564-0-I/2
-2-
Remanded with instructions.
WE CONCUR:

1 printed pages contain little extracted OCR body text; searchable legal-body completeness has not been established for those pages.

OCR transcription for search; preserved printed pages are authoritative

FILED
11/1/2021
Court of Appeals
Division |
State of Washington

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON

STATE OF WASHINGTON,
No. 82564-0-I
Respondent,
DIVISION ONE
V.
MICAH PATLAN SNYDER, UNPUBLISHED OPINION
Appellant.

PER CURIAM — Micah Snyder appeals his convictions for two counts of third
degree domestic violence assault. He contends, and the State concedes, that the
portion of his judgment and sentence ordering him to provide a DNA’ sample should be
stricken because he had already provided a sample pursuant to prior felony convictions.
RCW 43.43.754(4) (“If the Washington state patrol crime laboratory already has a DNA
sample from an individual for a qualifying offense, a subsequent submission is not

required to be submitted.”); State v. Houck, 9 Wn. App. 2d 636, 651 n.4, 446 P.3d 646

(2019); State v. Van Wolvelaere, 8 Wn. App. 2d 705, 710, 440 P.3d 1005 (2019).

We accept the State’s concession and remand to the trial court for a ministerial

order striking the order to submit a DNA sample.

1 Deoxyribonucleic acid.

Citations and pin cites are based on the Westlaw online version of the cited material.

No. 82564-0-1/2

Remanded with instructions.

WE CONCUR:

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.