State v. Arthur Allen Freiboth

2015AP2535-CR, 2015AP2525-CRWisctapp

Full text

Appeal No. 2015AP2535-CR Cir. Ct. No. 2014CF3338
WISCONSIN COURT OF APPEALS
DISTRICT I
STATE OF WISCONSIN,
PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
V.
ARTHUR ALLEN FREIBOTH,
DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
FILED
FEB 26, 2018
Sheila T. Reiff
Clerk of Supreme Court
CERTIFICATION BY WISCONSIN COURT OF APPEALS
Before Sherman, Blanchard, and Kloppenburg, JJ.
Pursuant to RULE 809.61, STATS., we certify the present appeal to
the Wisconsin Supreme Court to decide whether a defendant who was not advised
at the time of the plea that he or she faced multiple mandatory DNA surcharges
has grounds for plea withdrawal. This is the precise issue on which the Wisconsin
Supreme Court previously accepted certification in State v. Odom,
No. 2015AP2525-CR. However, the appellant in Odom has now voluntarily
dismissed that appeal. The Odom certification presents a thorough discussion of
the issue, which we do not repeat here.
We note that this court had over fifty cases on hold pending a
decision in Odom, and that additional no-merit appeals with this issue arrive in
this court each month. Therefore, resolution of the issue remains highly
significant.
No. 2015AP2535-CR
2
We appreciate that the Wisconsin Supreme Court is currently
scheduled to hear two companion cases dealing with other DNA surcharge issues
on March 16, 2018. We do not know if it is feasible on this timeline for this case
to be added to that oral argument schedule. Either way, we believe that it is
appropriate to certify this case to give the Wisconsin Supreme Court a vehicle to
address this issue, either in isolation or along with the other pending cases
involving DNA surcharge issues.

1 printed pages contain little extracted OCR body text; searchable legal-body completeness has not been established for those pages.

OCR transcription for search; preserved printed pages are authoritative

Appeal No. = 2015AP2535-CR Cir. Ct. No. 2014CF3338
WISCONSIN COURT OF APPEALS

DISTRICT I
STATE OF WISCONSIN,
PLAINIIFF-RESPONDENT, FILED
Vv. FEB 26, 2018
ARTHUR ALLEN FREIBOTH, Sheila T. Reiff
Clerk of Supreme Court
DEFENDANI-APPELLANT.

CERTIFICATION BY WISCONSIN COURT OF APPEALS

Before Sherman, Blanchard, and Kloppenburg, JJ.

Pursuant to RULE 809.61, STATS., we certify the present appeal to
the Wisconsin Supreme Court to decide whether a defendant who was not advised
at the time of the plea that he or she faced multiple mandatory DNA surcharges
has grounds for plea withdrawal. This is the precise issue on which the Wisconsin
Supreme Court previously accepted certification in Slate v. Odom
No. 2015AP2525-CR. However, the appellant in Odom has now voluntarily
dismissed that appeal. The Odom certification presents a thorough discussion of
the issue, which we do not repeat here.

We note that this court had over fifty cases on hold pending a
decision in Odom, and that additional no-menit appeals with this issue arrive in
this court each month. Therefore, resolution of the issue remains highly
significant.

No. 2015AP2535-CR
2
We appreciate that the Wisconsin Supreme Court is currently
scheduled to hear two companion cases dealing with other DNA surcharge issues
on March 16, 2018. We do not know if it is feasible on this timeline for this case
to be added to that oral argument schedule. Either way, we believe that it is
appropriate to certify this case to give the Wisconsin Supreme Court a vehicle to
address this issue, either in isolation or along with the other pending cases
involving DNA surcharge issues.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.