HQ 081424: Facsimile telephone toshiba permanent

us-cbp-cross-rulings-hq-081424HQ 081424: Facsimile telephone toshiba permanentGuidance

Native CBP ruling rendition. Applicability is fact-specific; modification/revocation relationships and original publisher date are retained. Publisher sentinel year0001 means unknown date, not a historical legal adoption.





                                       HQ 081424

                                   October 31, 1988




            CLA-2 CO:R:C:G  081424 LS

            CATEGORY:  Classification

            TARIFF NO.:  8517.82.0040

            Ms. Marty Langtry
            Castelazo & Associates
            5420 West 104th Street
            Los Angeles, California  90045

            RE:  Facsimile telephone toshiba permanent

            Dear Ms. Langtry:

                 This is in response to your letter, written on behalf of
            Toshiba America, Inc., in which you requested a classification
            ruling on a facsimile machine which includes a telephone.

            FACTS:

                 The facsimile machine is identified in the literature
            submitted by Toshiba America, Inc. as model TF-111.  It is
            described as a device which offers both telephone and facsimile
            transmission in a compact, desk-top product.  You state that
            the only difference between this model and the standard
            facsimile machine is that this model contains a permanently
            attached telephone with a detachable handset.  You further
            state that the main purpose of the telephone is to contact the
            operator when it is necessary to do so in order to send a
            transmission.  You have stated in a telephone conversation with
            the national import specialist that you did not know whether
            the telephone will be used exclusively with the facsimile
            machine or whether it will be used for voice communication in
            addition to its use with the facsimile machine.  You have also
            stated that the TF-111 model is sold as a facsimile machine.

                 The literature you have submitted describes the TF-111
            model as an office-capable facsimile unit which can be
            programmed with 30 facsimile destinations and 30 pre-set
            telephone numbers.  It features G2 and G3 transmission modes
















                                         - 2 -

            for compatibility with virtually any facsimile, and a
            proprietary Toshiba HS high speed transmission mode for
            communication with other Toshiba facsimile systems.  This model
            also can be programmed for Transmit Terminal Identification
            (TTI), with the user name and telephone number displayed at the
            top of each document page.  The facsimile will provide a
            detailed report of the last transactions and an automatic
            display of transmission, telephone numbers, and operating
            status.  It also has an auto-receive feature for unassisted
            recording of all incoming messages.  Some of the other features
            of this unit are an automatic document feeder, a digital face,
            and polling.  The latter feature allows this unit to pick up
            transmission activity and problem messages from another
            facsimile.

            ISSUE:

                 What are the applicable tariff classification provisions
            under the Tariff Schedules of the United States Annotated
            (TSUSA) and the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States
            Annotated (HTSUSA) for the subject facsimile machine, model TF-
            111, which includes a telephone?

            LAW AND ANALYSIS:

                 Item 684.66, TSUSA, specifically provides for electrical
            telegraph apparatus and instruments:  other:  terminal
            apparatus.  The question presented is whether the subject
            article is, in character or function, something other than
            telegraph terminal apparatus, which includes facsimile
            machines, as described in item 684.66, i.e., whether it is more
            limited or more diversified.  If the difference between the
            subject article and the article described in item 684.66 is
            significant, the article cannot be classified in that
            provision.  The subject article would then be considered more
            than a facsimile machine.  However, if the difference is in the
            nature of an improvement or amplification, and the essential
            character is preserved or only incidentally altered, the
            applicable rule is that an unlimited eo nomine statutory
            designation includes all forms of the article in the absence of
            a contrary legislative intent or commercial designation.
            Robert Bosch Corp. v. United States, 63 Cust. Ct. 96, 103-104,
            C.D. 3881 (1969).



















                                         - 3 -

                 It is necessary, therefore, to determine whether the
            permanently attached telephone makes the Toshiba model TF-111
            "more than" a facsimile machine or whether the telephone serves
            a function which is incidental, subordinate, or secondary to
            the function of the facsimile machine.  "It is a well settled
            principle that where merchandise has a single primary function
            and an incidental, subordinate, or secondary function, it is
            classifiable on the basis of its primary design, construction,
            and function."  Ashflash Corp. v. United States, 76 Cust. Ct.
            112, 115-116, C.D. 4643 (1976).  However, where merchandise
            constitutes more than a particular article or has additional
            nonsubordinate or coequal functions, it is not classifiable as
            that article.  Id. at 116.

                 The purpose of the telephone attached to the facsimile
            machine is to facilitate operation of the facsimile machine.
            Whether or not the telephone is used exclusively with the
            facsimile machine or is also used independently for voice
            communication, we find that the telephone serves a function
            which is incidental and subordinate to that of the facsimile
            machine.  Its function relates primarily to the function of the
            facsimile machine.  The telephone can be viewed as an added
            feature which improves the capability of the facsimile machine
            in an auxiliary manner.  Following the standard set forth in
            Robert Bosch Corp., supra, the article's essential character as
            a facsimile machine is not altered more than incidentally by
            the addition of the telephone.  Therefore, the subject article
            is classifiable on the basis of its primary function, i.e., as
            a facsimile machine.  See Trans-Atlantic Co. v. United States,
            60 CCPA 100, C.A.D. 1088 (1973); Ashflash Corp., supra.  The
            addition of the telephone does not render the subject article
            more than a facsimile machine.

                 The added feature of a telephone built into a facsimile
            machine is considered to be in the nature of an improvement.
            It has been held that an eo nomine designation covers all forms
            of the article subsequently created which fairly come within
            its scope, including improved models originating since the
            statutory enactment.  See Hoyt, Shepston & Sciaroni, S.
            Blondheim & Co. v. United States, 52 CCPA 101, 103-104 (1965);
            A.J. Arango, Inc. v. United States, 1 CIT 271, 274-275 (1981).
            A technological advancement which allows the incorporation of a
            telephone into the same unit as a facsimile machine does not
            preclude the classification of the TF-11 model as a facsimile
            machine under item 684.66.

















                                         - 4 -

                 In Phone-Mate, Inc. v. United States, Slip Op. 88-79 (Ct.
            Int'l. Trade, decided June 17, 1988), the Court of
            International Trade held that a combination telephone and
            answering machine device was properly classified by Customs
            under item 684.58, TSUSA, which provides for "telephone sets
            and other terminal equipment and parts thereof."  The court
            noted that in light of current developments in telecomunica-
            tions technology, the U.S. International Trade Commission,
            which drafted the revisions to the Tariff Schedules, considered
            the term "telephone" to have a broad enough scope to include
            articles which combine a telephone with other instruments or
            devices.  The court found that "the answering machine serves a
            secondary function which relates to the predominant use of the
            article as a means of transmitting and receiving telephonic
            messages."  Slip Op. at 14.

                 Likewise, we find that the provision for telegraph
            terminal apparatus, including facsimile machines, item 684.66,
            includes the Toshiba TF-111 unit which is a facsimile machine
            with a built-in telephone.  The telephone serves a secondary
            function which relates to the predominant use of the article as
            a means of transmitting and receiving documents.  The
            applicable duty rate is 4.7 percent ad valorem if the article
            is imported from a column 1 country.

                 Under the HTSUSA, General Rule of Interpretation (GRI) 1
            provides that classification is determined first according to
            the terms of the headings and any relative section or chapter
            notes.  Note 3 to Section XVI provides:

                 Unless the context otherwise requires, composite
                 machines consisting of two or more machines fitted
                 together to form a whole and other machines adapted
                 for the purpose of performing two or more comple-
                 mentary or alternative functions are to be classified
                 as if consisting only of that component or as being
                 that machine which performs the principal function.

                 Applying Note 3, the subject article which performs two
            complementary functions is classifiable as other telegraphic
            apparatus under subheading 8517.82.00 because the facsimile is
            the component of the article which performs the principal
            function.  Subheading 8517.82.00 provides for "Electrical
            apparatus for line telephony or telegraphy, including such
            apparatus for carrier-current line systems:  Other apparatus:
            Telegraphic.  The duty rate is 4.7 percent ad valorem if the
            merchandise is imported from a "Column 1 General" country.   















                                         - 5 -

            HOLDING:

                 In view of the foregoing, the Toshiba facsimile machine
            with the built in telephone is classifiable in item 684.66,
            TSUSA, which provides for electrical telegraph apparatus and
            instruments:  other:  terminal apparatus, dutiable at the rate
            of 4.7 percent ad valorem if imported from a column 1 country.
            The applicable provision under the HTSUSA is subheading
            8517.82.00, which provides for "Electrical apparatus for line
            telephony or telegraphy, including such apparatus for carrier-
            current line systems:  Other apparatus:  Telegraphic."  The
            duty rate for this provision is also 4.7 percent ad valorem if
            it is imported from a "Column 1 General" country.  The
            classification under the HTSUSA, effective January 1, 1989, is
            subject to changes made in the HTSUS prior to the effective
            date.

                                        Sincerely,




                                        John Durant, Director
                                        Commercial Rulings Division
































            6cc:  Area Director, New York Seaport
            LSchreiber:jaj:10/12/88






























































Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.