us-cbp-cross-rulings-hq-081620•HQ 081620: Classification of an athletic shoe with everskin overlays on a canvas upper
HQ 081620: Classification of an athletic shoe with everskin overlays on a canvas upper
us-cbp-cross-rulings-hq-081620HQ 081620: Classification of an athletic shoe with everskin overlays on a canvas upperGuidance
Native CBP ruling rendition. Applicability is fact-specific; modification/revocation relationships and original publisher date are retained. Publisher sentinel year0001 means unknown date, not a historical legal adoption.
HQ 081620
November 30, 1988
CLA-2:CO:R:C:G 081620 SR 826371
CATEGORY: Classification
TARIFF NO.: 6404.11.20.30
Ms. Susan Daniels
Items International Inc.
7700 El Camino Real
Suite 207
Carlsbad, Ca. 92008
RE: Classification of an athletic shoe with everskin overlays on
a canvas upper
Dear Ms. Daniels:
This is in reference to your letter of November 9, 1987,
requesting the tariff classification of a man's hi-top athletic
shoe under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States
Annotated (HTSUSA). A sample was submitted.
FACTS:
The merchandise in question is a man's hi-top athletic shoe.
The shoe has an upper of canvas and an outer sole of rubber with
a rubber foxing band. The upper has turquoise split leather
overlays which cover over 50 percent of the external surface. On
both sides of each shoe's upper is a decorative patch overlay
made of black everskin. Everskin is a plastic coated leather
material.
ISSUE:
1. Whether "everskin" is considered a plastic surface or a
leather surface.
2. What should be included as the external surface area of
the upper.
LAW AND ANALYSIS:
Issue No. 1
The definition of patent leather sets guidelines as to
whether coated leather is plastic or leather. The Explanatory
Notes constitute the official interpretation of the Harmonized
System at the international level. Explanatory Note 41.09 (1),
- 2 -
defines patent leather as leather coated with a non-transparent,
lustrous, mirror-like coating, and is considered to be leather if
the plastic coating does not exceed 0.15 mm. (6/1000 inch) thick,
and as plastic if over that thickness. These measurements have
become the standard guideline for plastic coated leather
articles, and should apply to "everskin" as well. Therefore, if
the plastic coating on the "everskin" does not exceed 0.15 mm.
(6/1000 inch) thick it is considered leather, if over 0.15 mm.
(6/1000) thick, it is plastic.
Issue No. 2
Note 4(a) to Chapter 64 of the HTSUSA, states that "[t]he
material of the upper shall be taken to be the constituent
material having the greatest external surface area, no account
being taken of accessories or reinforcements, such as ankle
patches, edging, ornamentation, buckles, tabs, eyelet stays or
similar attachments." In accordance with this rule, and for
purposes of determining the constituent material of the upper,
the leather overlays of the shoe are excluded from consideration.
Thus the material of the shoe having the greatest external
surface area is the canvas or textile under heading 6404 HTSUSA.
For the purpose of classifying the product under subheading
6404.11.20, HTSUSA, the leather accessories or reinforcements are
included in determining external surface area. At the subheading
level 6404.11.20, HTSUSA, provides for footwear "having uppers of
which over 50 percent of the external surface area (including any
leather accessories or reinforcements such as those mentioned in
note 4(a) to this chapter) is leather." The leather overlays are
sufficient to make up over 50 percent of the external surface of
the upper. Therefore, whether or not the everskin is plastic or
leather this shoe must be classified under subheading
6404.11.20.30, HTSUSA, as sports footwear having an upper of over
50 percent leather.
HOLDING:
Issue No. 1
The everskin is considered to be leather if the plastic
coating does not exceed 0.15 mm. (6/1000 inch) thick. If the
plastic coating exceeds 0.15 mm. (6/1000 inch) thick then it is
considered to be plastic.
Issue No. 2
The hi-top athletic shoes are classifiable under subheading
6404.11.20.30, HTSUSA, as footwear with outer soles of rubber or
plastics, tennis shoes, basketball shoes, gym shoes, training
shoes and the like, having uppers of which over 50 percent of the
external surface area (including any leather accessories or
- 3 -
reinforcements such as those mentioned in note 4(a) to this
chapter) is leather. The applicable rate of duty for this
provision is 10.5 percent ad valorem.
This classification represents the present position of the
Customs Service regarding the dutiable status of the merchandise
under the HTSUSA. The HTSUSA is scheduled to replace the TSUS on
January 1, 1989. If there are changes before the HTSUSA becomes
effective this advice may not continue to be applicable.
Sincerely,
John Durant, Director
Commercial Rulings Division
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.