us-cbp-cross-rulings-hq-082021•HQ 082021: Decision on Application for Further Review of Protest No. 2809-4-001100
HQ 082021: Decision on Application for Further Review of Protest No. 2809-4-001100
us-cbp-cross-rulings-hq-082021HQ 082021: Decision on Application for Further Review of Protest No. 2809-4-001100Guidance
Native CBP ruling rendition. Applicability is fact-specific; modification/revocation relationships and original publisher date are retained. Publisher sentinel year0001 means unknown date, not a historical legal adoption.
HQ 082021
January 31, 1989
CLA-2:CO:R:C:G 082021 SR
CATEGORY: Classification
TARIFF NO.: 731.22
District Director of Customs
555 Battery Street
P.O. Box 2450
San Francisco, California 94126
RE: Decision on Application for Further Review of Protest
No. 2809-4-001100
Dear Sir:
This is our decision on Application for Further Review of
Protest No. 2809-4-001100, dated August 2, 1984, covering
various entries which were liquidated on May 4, 1984. At issue
is the tariff classification of certain fishing rods and line
from Taiwan.
FACTS:
The merchandise at issue consists of fishing reels with
nylon line put up on them. They were liquidated as entireties
under item 731.22, Tariff Schedules of the United States
(TSUS), as fishing reels valued over $2.70 but not over $8.45
each. The importer, Pacific Products, has proposed various
alternatives. The importer claims in all but one of these
alternatives that the fishing reel and line are not an entirety
and, therefore, should be classified in item 731.20, TSUS, the
provision for fishing reels valued not over $2.70 each; and the
line should be classified in item 731.44, TSUS, the provision
for fishing line put up and packaged for retail sale. If the
reel and line are classified separately, the value of the reel
might (depending on whether or not the cost of putting up the
line on the reels is attributed to the reels as well as to the
line) fall below $2.70 each. Fishing reels valued not over
$2.70 each are classified under item 731.20, TSUS.
ISSUE:
Whether the fishing reel and line should be classified
together or separately.
- 2 -
LAW AND ANALYSIS:
One of the claims made by the importer's counsel is that a
uniform and established practice exists with regard to the
classification of this merchandise. He claims that this
practice was established by Rulings TC 492.222C of
December 30, 1965, and MFG 422.222TT 009723 of February 24,
1971. However, mere issuance of a ruling without publication
in the Customs Bulletin does not create a uniform and
established practice. 19 CFR section 177.10(b). No evidence
of creation of a practice by liquidations of entries covering
the merchandise in question is presented. These rulings
provided no facts or rationale for their conclusions so they
cannot be discussed as precedent.
The decision to classify and liquidate the reel and line
as an entirety under item 731.22, TSUS, as fishing reels was
based on Headquarters Ruling Letter (HRL) 072875, dated March
8, 1984. This ruling also dealt with fishing reels with the
line put up and packaged for retail sale. In this ruling the
line was found to be an entirety with the reel and classifiable
under item 731.22, TSUS.
The decision in HRL 072875 was based on Charles Garcia and
Co. v. United States, 45 CCPA 1, C.A.D. 663 (1957), and United
States v. Charles Garcia and Co., 48 CCPA 140, C.A.D. 780
(1961). The Garcia cases dealt with fishing reels which were
packaged with an extra spool specially designed to be used for
a different type of fishing. It was found that the fishing
reel and the extra spool to be an entirety because the fishing
reel, as it was intended to be used was not complete without
the extra spool. This decision was based on Norma Company of
America v. United States, 6 Ct. Cust. Appls. 89, T.D. 35338
(1915), which held that if a part of an article is necessary
for the article to perform its function then the part is part
of the entirety.
The fishing reel at issue could not be used to fish
without the fishing line. The fishing reel and fishing line
are classifiable as an entirety.
HOLDING:
The fishing reels and line are classifiable as an entirety
under item 731.20, TSUS, as fishing reels and parts thereof:
reels: valued not over $2.70 each, or item 731.22, TSUS, as
fishing reels and parts thereof: reels: valued over $2.70 but
not over $8.45 each.
- 3 -
The protest should be denied. A copy of this decision
should be attached to the Form 19 Notice of Action to be sent
to the protestant.
Sincerely,
John Durant, Director
Commercial Rulings Division
6cc: Area Director, New York Seaport
2cc: Chief, CIE
1cc: Regional Commissioner Los Angeles, California
1cc: Regulatory Trade Program Div. Room 1328
SRosenow:jaj:1/23/89
HQ 082021 ENTRIES
ENTRY NUMBER DATE OF ENTRY
81-133452-5 9-11-81
133521-0 9-18-81
82-137247-0 1-7-82
137351-8 2-1-82
137547-7 3-29-82
137829-6 7-2-82
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.