us-cbp-cross-rulings-hq-082036•HQ 082036: Classification of synthetic metalized yarns
HQ 082036: Classification of synthetic metalized yarns
us-cbp-cross-rulings-hq-082036HQ 082036: Classification of synthetic metalized yarnsGuidance
Native CBP ruling rendition. Applicability is fact-specific; modification/revocation relationships and original publisher date are retained. Publisher sentinel year0001 means unknown date, not a historical legal adoption.
HQ 082036
October 3, 1988
CLA-2 CO:R:C:G 082036 CMR
CATEGORY: Classification
TARIFF NO.: 5605.00.0000; 310.6055
Mr. Andras Bende
Bende & Sons, Inc.
180 Autumn Street
Passaic, New Jersey 07055
RE: Classification of synthetic metalized yarns
Dear Mr. Bende:
This ruling is in response to your letter of March 24, 1988,
requesting the tariff classification of synthetic metalized yarns
from Japan.
FACTS:
You have requested that we classify the submitted synthetic
metalized yarns in item 312.3000, Tariff Schedules of the United
States Annotated (TSUSA), since the military is allowing their
use as an option in place of all metallic yarn which is
classified in item 312.3000, TSUSA. The synthetic metalized
yarns are used in the manufacturing of military ornamental lace
and embroidery, and are imported from Japan. Three samples of
yarn were submitted, along with samples of end products produced
by you in the United States with the yarn: ornamental lace,
embroidery, and yarn lace.
The submitted samples of yarn consist of synthetic metalized
yarn in three colors: gold, silver, and aluminum. The yarns
consist of a synthetic metallic filament wound evenly around a
synthetic man-made fiber core. The gold yarn (class 8) consists
of a gold colorant encased in clear polyester film, 0.005 inches
in thickness with a metallic-silver surface. The silver metallic
filament (class 9) consists of a metallic aluminum encased or
laminated between clear polyester film. The silver metallic
filament (class 10) consists of pure silver encased between a
clear polyester film, 0.005 inches in thickness. The yarns are
wholly of man-made fiber filament, and are wrapped or gimped.
-2-
ISSUE:
Is the synthetic metalized yarn in chief value of tinsel wire
or lame, and therefore classifiable in item 312.3000, TSUSA, as
requested?
LAW AND ANALYSIS:
Classification of an article must be based on application of
the provisions of the tariff schedule and applicable case law.
While the military specifications for synthetic metallic yarn
were somewhat helpful in describing the yarn, military speci-
fications do not affect the classification of the submitted yarn.
In addition, the fact that the military allows the use of the
synthetic metalized yarn in place of the metalized yarn currently
classified in item 312.3000, TSUSA, will not affect its classi-
fication. The synthetic metalized yarn must be classified
according to its own composition. Its classification is not
determined by the classification of the article it is replacing.
You requested that we consider classification of the
synthetic metalized yarn in item 312.3000, TSUSA. For the
reasons which follow, classification of the yarn in this item
number would be incorrect.
Item 312.3000, TSUSA, specifically provides for metalized
yarns. Schedule 3, Part 1, Subpart F, Headnote 1(a), TSUSA,
defines metalized yarns as "yarns, in chief value, but not
wholly, of tinsel wire and lame." In order to be classified in
item 312.3000, TSUSA, the synthetic metalized yarn must meet the
definition in the headnote.
Tinsel wire and lame are described in the 1948 Summaries of
Tariff Information, Volume 3, Part 5, page 104, as follows:
Tinsel wire is round wire composed chiefly of copper or
brass. It is usually coated or plated with a bright metal,
such as real or imitation gold or silver and it is also
produced in colors. Lame (a French word) (lahn in Germany)
is manufactured by passing the tinsel wire through metal
rollers which flatten it into various widths depending on the
gage of the wire; it is often subjected to ornamental
corrugating or coloring processes. Bullions are made by
twisting lame or lahn to produce hollow spiral forms. Tinsel
thread is lame wound around a suitable core such as cotton or
silk.
The yarns at issue here are produced by encasing either gold
colorants, metallic aluminum or metallic silver between clear
polyester film. These yarns are analogous to the yarn which was
at issue in Kaplan Products & Textiles Inc. v. United States, 51
-3-
CCPA 2, C.A.D. 828 (1963). The yarn in that case was made by
bonding transparent cellophane onto both sides of a sheet of
aluminum foil, and then slicing the laminated aluminum sheet into
narrow widths. The court found that the resulting strips did not
"fall within the term lame as used in the Tariff Act." Id. at 6.
Additionally, the Summaries of Trade and Tariff Information,
Schedule 3, Volume 2, 1969, page 155, states that while the term
lame is applied to various forms of plastic filaments which
contain metal, plastic filaments are not tinsel or lame for
tariff purposes. The submitted synthetic metalized yarns are
precluded from classification in item 312.3000, TSUSA, because
they do not fall within the meaning of the terms tinsel wire or
lame as used in the headnote.
In Headquarters Ruling Letter (HRL) 078975 dated October 21,
1986, yarn composed of an elastomer core thread wrapped with a
nylon yarn was not considered to be plied for tariff purposes.
The yarns at issue here are wrapped or gimped, and similar in
construction to the yarn at issue in HRL 078975. Therefore, the
synthetic metalized yarns are not considered plied or single.
HOLDING:
The synthetic metalized yarns are classifiable in the
provision for yarns of man-made fibers, other, . . ., other, in
item 310.6055, TSUSA, textile category 607. The rate of duty is
15 percent ad valorem.
Under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States
Annotated (HTSUSA), the provision for metalized yarns is broader
than that under the TSUSA. Under the HTSUSA, synthetic metalized
yarns are classifiable in the provision for metalized yarns in
subheading 5605.00.0000, HTSUSA, textile category 201. The rate
of duty is 15 percent ad valorem. This classification represents
the present position of the Customs Service. If changes occur
before the effective date of January 1, 1989, this advice may not
continue to be applicable.
Sincerely,
John Durant, Director
Commercial Rulings Division
6cc: Area Director, New York Seaport
1cc: CITA
1cc: Legal Reference Section
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.