us-cbp-cross-rulings-hq-083799•HQ 083799: Reconsideration of NYRL 836177 of February 9, 1989
HQ 083799: Reconsideration of NYRL 836177 of February 9, 1989
us-cbp-cross-rulings-hq-083799HQ 083799: Reconsideration of NYRL 836177 of February 9, 1989Guidance
Native CBP ruling rendition. Applicability is fact-specific; modification/revocation relationships and original publisher date are retained. Publisher sentinel year0001 means unknown date, not a historical legal adoption.
HQ 083799
June 16, 1989
CLA-2 CO:R:C:G 083799 CMR
CATEGORY: Classification
TARIFF NO.: 6108.30.0010
Ms. Julie White
Nordstrom, Inc.
A/P Import Office
1321 2nd Avenue
Seattle, Washington 98101
RE: Reconsideration of NYRL 836177 of February 9, 1989
Dear Ms. White:
This ruling is in response to your request of February 21, 1989,
for reconsideration of NYRL 836177.
FACTS:
The submitted sample, style 463P, is a women's chemise bikini
set. The set consists of a chemise and matching panty. The chemise
is a tank top style, sleeveless garment with a partial placket with
six buttons that extends down the front from the neck. The armholes
and the bottom are trimmed with a narrow lace edging. At the hip the
bottom section of the garment is cut, sewn and gathered into a
flounce. The knit panty has elastic bands finishing the waistband
and leg openings. The chemise and panty are made of the same
lightweight knit fabric consisting of 60 percent cotton and 40
percent polyester fibers. Style 463P is imported from Hong Kong.
NYRL 836177 classified the chemise as a dress, and the matching
panty as underwear.
ISSUE:
Are the garments of style 463P correctly classified in NYRL
836177 as a dress and underwear, or are they classifiable as
nightwear?
-2-
LAW AND ANALYSIS:
In Mast Industries v. United States, 9 CIT 549, 552 (1985),
aff'd, 786 F. 2d 1144 (1986), the court noted the definition of
"nightwear" as "garments to be worn to bed." The court held that the
particular garment at issue was classifiable as nightwear since it
was designed, manufactured, marketed and used as nightwear.
The court in Mast Industries, Inc., supra, at 552 also noted
that "the merchandise itself may be strong evidence of use." United
States v. Bruce Duncan Co., 50 CCPA 43, 46, C.A.D. 817 (1963). Style
463P is constructed of lightweight cotton knit fabric and designed to
be loose fitting for comfort while sleeping. Additionally, we agree
it is not common practice to sell a dress for an adult with matching
underwear as a set. It is common practice, however, to sell
nightshirts or similar garments with matching panties.
Upon our request, you have submitted a copy of a purchase order
to show that style 463P is indeed purchased by you as sleepwear. In
light of this evidence and after examination of the garments them-
selves, we agree that style 463P is nightwear.
HOLDING:
NYRL 836177 is hereby revoked in full in accordance with 19 CFR
177.9(d).
Style 463P is classifiable as nightwear in subheading
6108.31.0010, textile category 351, dutiable at 9 percent ad valorem.
Due to the changeable nature of the statistical annotation (the
ninth and tenth digits of the classification) and the restraint
(quota/visa) categories, you should contact your local Customs office
prior to importation of this merchandise to determine the current
status of any import restraints or requirements.
Your sample will be returned, under separate cover, as
requested.
Sincerely,
John Durant, Director
Commercial Rulings Division
6cc: Area Director, New York Seaport
1cc: CITA
1cc: Legal Reference Section
1cc: Phil Robins
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.