HQ 084601: Classification of textile costumes

us-cbp-cross-rulings-hq-084601HQ 084601: Classification of textile costumesGuidance

Native CBP ruling rendition. Applicability is fact-specific; modification/revocation relationships and original publisher date are retained. Publisher sentinel year0001 means unknown date, not a historical legal adoption.










                                    HQ 084601

                                September 8, 1989


      CLA-2 CO:R:C:G  084601  CMR

      CATEGORY: Classification

      TARIFF NO.: 6114.30.3070, 6110.30.3055, 6104.63.2010, 6117.80.0030,
                  9505.90.6000, 6114.30.3070, 6114.30.3070, 6114.30.3070

      Leonard Fertman, Esq.
      2049 Century Park East
      Suite 1800
      Los Angeles, California  90067

      RE: Classification of textile costumes

      Dear Mr. Fertman:

           This ruling is in response to your letter of May 12, 1989, on
      behalf of your client, National Theme Productions, requesting the
      classification of various costumes for children and adults.  You have
      also requested that we reconsider HRL 082626 of December 21, 1988, in
      which we ruled textile costumes are articles of fancy dress.  Five
      samples have been submitted for our review.  The costumes are
      assembled in Mexico and will be imported through the port of San
      Ysidro.

      FACTS:

           Style 10297, Serena the Elusive Unicorn costume, consists of a
      top-like garment of 90 percent polyester/10 percent acrylic, legging
      pieces and mitts, a vinyl belt, and a headpiece and tailpiece of
      gathered netting material.  The costume sample is sized for adults.

           Style 10354, Harem Scarem, The Egyptian Mummy costume, consists
      of a 100 percent polyester knit long-sleeved top, matching polyester
      knit pants with an elastic waistband, a polyester hood and face
      guard, and polyester knit shoe covers with fabric half-soles with
      laminated plastics.  The costume sample is sized for adults.

           Style 25191, Fur-R-Roshus costume, consists of a 100 percent
      polyester knit jumpsuit with an open back with a tie closure, a tail
      that buttons to the jumpsuit, mitts of polyester knit and acrylic
      plush, anklets of acrylic plush and a lion-like headpiece of acrylic
      plush.  The costume sample is sized for children.











                                       -2-


           Style 10299, Ghost costume, consists of a body garment of
      (assumably) 100 percent polyester knit fabric and a headpiece of the
      same fabric with a pompom nose and woven net eyes and mouth.  The
      costume sample is sized for adults.

           Style 10247, Godzilla costume, consists of a jumpsuit-like
      garment with a open back with a tie closure and a long, dragon-like
      tail, a headpiece, mitts, and shoe covers.  The costume pieces are
      made of 100 percent polyester fabric and in some pieces (the tail,
      headpiece, and shoe covers) the fabric covers a foam material.

      ISSUE:

           Are the costumes at issue "apparel"?

           Are the costumes classifiable as toys in Chapter 95, or are they
      considered fancy dress classifiable in Section XI by application of
      exclusion Note 1(e) of Chapter 95?

           Will Customs maintain the position adopted in HRL 082626 of
      December 21, 1988, that textile costumes are articles of fancy dress?

      LAW AND ANALYSIS:

           Under the HTSUSA, toys are classified in Chapter 95.  How-
      ever, Note 1(e) excludes articles of "fancy dress, of textiles, of
      chapter 61 or 62" from classification within Chapter 95.

           As you noted, fancy dress is defined in Mary Brooks Picken's The
      Fashion Dictionary (1973) as:

           Costume representing a nation, class, calling, etc., as worn to
           costume ball or masquerade party.  (Page 134)

      Webster's Third New International Dictionary, Unabridged, at 822
      (1965) defines fancy dress as:

           a costume (as for a masquerade or party) departing from
           currently conventional style and usu. representing a fictional
           or historical character, an animal, the fancy of the wearer, or
           a particular occupation . . .

      Costume is defined in Mary Brooks Picken's The Fashion Dictionary as:

           1. Complete dress or apparel, including all outer garments and
           accessories worn at one time.  Also, dress in general; but
           incorrectly used for a dress.  Compare DRESSES.  2. Type of
           dress for wear to fancy dress ball.  See FANCY DRESS.  3. Type
           of dress characteristic of any country, period, class, or
           calling. (Bold added) (Page 90)











                                       -3-


      From the same source, we find the following terms and definitions:

           apparel: Clothing of all sorts; *  *  * (Page 6)

           clothing: Any wearing apparel.  For types, see SPORTS CLOTHES
           and DRESSES.  (Page 70)

           garment: Any article of apparel, chiefly one made of fabric.
           (Page 160)

      Under the topic heading "Dress and Dresses" is the directive "Also
      see FANCY DRESS."  (Page 109)

           In Webster's II New Riverside University Dictionary, at 118
      (1984), apparel is defined as: "1. Clothing.  2. Something that
      covers or adorns."  Costume is defined as: "1. A prevalent style of
      dress, including clothing, accessories, and hairdos.  2. A style of
      dress typical of a particular time, country, or people, often worn in
      a play or at a festival.  3. A set of clothes appropriate for a
      particular occasion or season."

           From the above definitions, it appears that the terms apparel,
      clothing, and garment are interchangeable.  It also appears clear
      that fancy dress is a costume and that a costume is apparel or
      clothing of a particular type.  Therefore, if the costumes at issue
      are fancy dress, as we believe they are, then they are apparel.

           We note your objection to the statement in HRL 082626 that "The
      Note 1(e) exclusion includes all fancy dress of textile materials and
      appears to leave no room for differentiating between costumes based
      on their construction, utilitarian value, and use."  However, we
      disagree with your application of the definitions you have quoted to
      support your argument that fancy dress applies only to costumes of
      exceptional quality.  The definition of the term fancy from The
      Random House Dictionary of the English Language that you cite is but
      one definition, and the term "fancy dress" is a term of art and
      defined by many sources as a costume or masquerade costume.

           We believe additional support for the position we have taken in
      regard to the meaning of fancy dress in the Note 1(e) exclusion of
      Chapter 95, can be found in a vote taken by the Nomenclature
      Committee of the Customs Cooperation Council

           In October 1983, the Nomenclature Committee of the Customs
      Cooperation Council, at the request of the Australian Administration,
      considered the classification of children's "Spiderman" and "Hulk"
      suits; a cowboy suit composed of a waistcoat and chaps with holster,
      of textile material; a cowboy suit composed of a waistcoat and
      trousers incorporating a simulated belt with holster, of textile
      material; and an Indian girl costume consisting of a dress, a
      headband and simulated braids, of textile material.  The











                                       -4-


      classification issue then, as in this case, was whether the costumes
      were classifiable as toys in Chapter 97 (now known as Chapter 95), or
      as textile articles of Section XI.  The Committee decided the
      costumes were fancy dress, classifiable in Section XI by application
      of exclusion Note 1(e) to Chapter 97 (now Chapter 95).  Annex F/5 to
      Doc. 30.550 E (NC/51/Oct. 83).

           Although not bound by this decision of the Nomenclature
      Committee, Customs believes it illustrates the intent of the Note
      1(e) exclusion to Chapter 95, and the meaning of fancy dress as it is
      used in that exclusion.  In accordance with the Committee's decision
      and Note 1(e) to Chapter 95, costumes of textile materials are
      classifiable in Section XI.

           Note 13 of Section XI provides:

           Unless the context otherwise requires, textile garments of
           different headings are to be classified in their own headings
           even if put up in sets for retail sale.

           Note 13 of Section XI requires that textile garments of differ-
      ent headings be separately classified, thus preventing classification
      of costumes consisting of two or more garments as sets.  If a set
      cannot exist by application of Note 13, the articles which may be
      packaged with the garments must also be classified separately.  How-
      ever, costumes consisting of single garments with accessories do not
      fall into the purview of Headnote 13.  Therefore, single garments
      with accessories may be classifiable as sets by application of
      General Rule of Interpretation 3(b) according to the item in the set
      from which the set derives its essential character.  Customs believes
      that the essential character of costumes consisting of single
      garments with accessories is generally imparted by the garment since
      without the garment you would merely have a collection of accessory
      items.

           Hats and headpieces are generally classified in Chapter 65 of
      the HTSUSA.  However, Chapter 65, Note 1(c), excludes "doll" hats,
      other toy hats or carnival articles of Chapter 95.  Chapter 95, Note
      1(e) excludes sports clothing or fancy dress, of textiles, of Chapter
      61 or 62.  While the costume hats and headpieces could be considered
      to fall within the meaning of fancy dress of textiles, they would not
      be classified in Chapter 61 or 62, but in Chapter 65; therefore, the
      exclusionary note does not apply.

      HOLDING:

           Based on the above analysis, Customs will maintain the position
      adopted in HRL 082626 that textile costumes are articles of fancy
      dress.












                                       -5-


           Style 10297, Serena the Elusive Unicorn costume, is classifi-
      able as a set by application of GRI 3(b).  The costume is classified
      in the provision for the top-like garment.  The remaining pieces are
      accessories to this garment and used to help create the costume.  The
      costume is classified in the provision for other garments, knitted or
      crocheted, of man-made fibers, other, subheading 6114.30.3070,
      HTSUSA, textile category 659, dutiable at 16.1 percent ad valorem.

           Style 10354, Harem Scarem, The Egyptian Mummy, cannot be
      classified as a set because it consists of more than one garment.
      The long-sleeved knit top is classified under the provision for
      sweaters, pullovers, sweatshirts, waistcoats (vests) and similar
      articles, knitted or crocheted, of man-made fibers, other, other,
      subheading 6110.30.3055, HTSUSA, textile category 639, dutiable at
      34.2 percent ad valorem.  The knit pants are classified under the
      provision for women's or girls' trousers, bib and brace overalls,
      breeches and shorts, of synthetic fibers, other, other, trousers and
      breeches, subheading 6104.63.2010, HTSUSA, textile category 648,
      dutiable at 30 percent ad valorem.  The leggings and face guard are
      classified as other made up clothing accessories, knitted or
      crocheted, other accessories, of man-made fibers, subheading
      6117.80.0030, HTSUSA, textile category 659, dutiable at 15.5 percent
      ad valorem.  The headpiece is classified as a festive, carnival or
      other entertainment article in subheading 9505.90.6000, HTSUSA,
      dutiable at 3.1 percent ad valorem.

           Style 25191, the Fur-R-Roshus costume, is classifiable as a set
      by application of GRI 3(b).  The costume is classified in the
      provision for the knit jumpsuit.  The remaining pieces are
      accessories to this garment and used to help create the costume.  The
      costume is classified in the provision for other garments, knitted or
      crocheted, of man-made fibers, other, subheading 6114.30.3070,
      HTSUSA, textile category 659, dutiable at 16.1 percent ad valorem.

           Style 10299, the Ghost costume, is classifiable as a set by
      application of GRI 3(b).  The costume is classified in the provision
      for the body garment which is classified in the provision for other
      garments, knitted or crocheted, of man-made fibers, other, subheading
      6114.30.3070, HTSUSA, textile category 659, dutiable at 16.1 percent
      ad valorem.

           Style 10247, Godzilla costume, is classifiable as a set by
      application of GRI 3(b).  The costume is classified in the provision
      for the jumpsuit-like garment which is classified in the provision
      for other garments, knitted or crocheted, of man-made fibers, other,
      subheading 6114.30.3070, HTSUSA, textile category 659, dutiable at
      16.1 percent ad valorem.














                                       -6-


           The designated textile and apparel category may be subdivided
      into parts.  If so, the visa and quota requirements applicable to the
      subject merchandise may be affected.  Since part categories are the
      result of international bilateral agreements which are subject to
      frequent renegotiations and changes, to obtain the most current
      information available, we suggest that you check, close to the time
      of shipment, the Status Report on Current Import Quotas (Restraint
      Levels), an internal issuance of the U.S. Customs Service, available
      for inspection at your local Customs office.

           Due to the changeable nature of the statistical annotation (the
      ninth and tenth digits of the classification) and the restraint
      (quota/visa) categories, you should contact your local Customs office
      prior to importation of this merchandise to determine the current
      status of any import restraints or requirements.


                                      Sincerely,



                                      John Durant, Director
                                      Commercial Rulings Division






































      6cc: Area Director, New York Seaport
      1cc: CITA
      1cc: Legal Reference Section
      1cc: Phil Robins






















































Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.