us-cbp-cross-rulings-hq-086398•HQ 086398: Protest No. 3801-9-002103, on classification of women's 100 percent cotton garments
HQ 086398: Protest No. 3801-9-002103, on classification of women's 100 percent cotton garments
us-cbp-cross-rulings-hq-086398HQ 086398: Protest No. 3801-9-002103, on classification of women's 100 percent cotton garmentsGuidance
Native CBP ruling rendition. Applicability is fact-specific; modification/revocation relationships and original publisher date are retained. Publisher sentinel year0001 means unknown date, not a historical legal adoption.
HQ 086398
February 15, 1990
CLA-2:CO:R:C:G 086398 DRR
CATEGORY: Classification
TARIFF NO.: 384.49
District Director of Customs
55 East Monroe Street
Chicago, Illinois 60603-5790
Re: Protest No. 3801-9-002103, on classification of women's
100 percent cotton garments
Dear Sir:
This is our decision on an Application for Further Review
of Protest No. 3801-9-002103, filed by Ocean, Inc., on June 23,
1989, on classification of merchandise invoiced as 100 percent
cotton ready-made garments, not ornamented, under Tariff
Schedules of the United States (TSUS) item 384.49. The
merchandise was entered on February 17, 1988. No sample was
forwarded to headquarters.
FACTS:
The merchandise at issue consists of sixty cartons of
white dresses, described as having been manufactured in the
cottage industry of Pakistan. The entry documents were
presented as a non-release entry with a textile visa for
category 336. The merchandise was certified by the Chamber of
Commerce and Industry of Karachi, Pakistan as "PAKISTAN ARTS
HANDICRAFTS." A Single Country Declaration also accompanied
the entry. The importer maintains that the documentation
provided is sufficient to classify the merchandise under TSUS
384.4510. Customs Form 29, Notice of Action was issued
February 28, 1988, informing the importer of the rate advance.
ISSUE:
Whether the garments at issue are handloomed folklore
products classifiable under TSUS item 384.4510.
- 2 -
LAW AND ANALYSIS:
The merchandise in question does not qualify for treatment
as handloomed and folklore products for a number of reasons.
The U.S. Trade Representative has implemented no procedure or
bilateral agreement under the TSUS for garments to qualify for
entry as handloomed and folklore products. Furthermore, the
merchandise itself does not meet the requirements for
handloomed and folklore products. Samples submitted to the
District office show that the garments received considerable
processing by machine.
HOLDING:
The garments at issue were properly classified under TSUS
item 384.4925, with a duty rate of 12 percent ad valorem.
Accordingly, you should deny the protest in full. A copy
of this decision should be sent to the protestant along with
the Form 19 Notice of Action.
Sincerely,
John Durant, Director
Commercial Rulings Division
cc: 6 A.D., N.Y. Seaport
D. Rimmer library/peh
085965
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.