us-cbp-cross-rulings-hq-554917•HQ 554917: Applicability of partial duty exemption of item 806.20, TSUS, to certain greige goods exported to Italy for printing
HQ 554917: Applicability of partial duty exemption of item 806.20, TSUS, to certain greige goods exported to Italy for printing
us-cbp-cross-rulings-hq-554917HQ 554917: Applicability of partial duty exemption of item 806.20, TSUS, to certain greige goods exported to Italy for printingGuidance
Native CBP ruling rendition. Applicability is fact-specific; modification/revocation relationships and original publisher date are retained. Publisher sentinel year0001 means unknown date, not a historical legal adoption.
HQ 554917
June 20, 1988
CLA-2 CO:R:C:V 554917DBI
CATEGORY: Classification
TARIFF NO.: 9802.00.40; 806.20
Mr. Harry Galtieri
Anju/Woodridge, Inc.
295 Fifth Avenue
New York, New York 10016
RE: Applicability of partial duty exemption of item 806.20,
TSUS, to certain greige goods exported to Italy for
printing
Dear Mr. Galteiri:
This is in response to your letter of February 12, 1988, in
which you request a ruling concerning the dutiability of certain
U.S. greige goods exported to Italy for printing.
FACTS:
You state that U.S. greige goods will be sent to Italy for
printing. In your telephone conversation on May 26, 1988, with a
member of my staff, you indicated that a design will be printed
on the greige goods which will be used for home furnishings such
as drapery, bedspreads and upholstery for furniture. The goods
will then be returned to the U.S. for further manufacture into
home furnishings. Inasmuch as you ask whether the printing
process constitutes a loss of identity of American goods, we
assume that you are referring to the applicability of item
806.20, Tariff Schedules of the United States (TSUS), to the
greige goods.
ISSUE:
Whether the described greige goods, when returned to the
U.S., will be eligible for the partial exemption from duty
provided for in item 806.20, TSUS (9802.00.40, Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (HTSUSA)).
LAW AND ANALYSIS:
Item 806.20, TSUS, provides for the assessment of duty on
the value of repairs or alterations performed on articles
returned to the U.S. after having been exported to be advanced in
- 2 -
value or improved in condition by any process of manufacture or
other means. However, the application of this tariff provision
is precluded where the foreign processing operation is a
necessary step in the preparation or manufacture of finished
articles. Dolliff and Company, Inc. v. United States, 66 CCPA
77, CAD 1225, 599 F.2d 1015 (1979).
We have previously held in a ruling dated February 13, 1987
(HQ 554441) that the printing of U.S. laces and fabrics in Italy
was a continuation of the total goods-in-process manufacture and
that the goods were not considered finished until printed.
Therefore, the printing exceeded the meaning of the term
alteration and precluded the application of item 806.20, TSUS.
We believe that the foreign printing process constitutes an
operation that exceeds an alteration based on our previous
ruling. The greige goods require a further step in the
preparation of the finished product.
HOLDING:
On the basis of the information submitted, it is our
opinion that the foreign printing process may not be considered
an alteration as that term is used in item 806.20, TSUS, and,
therefore, precludes tariff treatment of the returned goods under
the provision of item 806.20, TSUS.
Sincerely,
John Durant, Director
Commercial Rulings Division
1cc: CLA-2 CO:R:C:V:DIZZO:SDZ:5/3/88
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.