us-cbp-cross-rulings-hq-555012•HQ 555012: Applicability of partial duty exemption of item 807.00, TSUS, to plastic bags assembled in Mexico
HQ 555012: Applicability of partial duty exemption of item 807.00, TSUS, to plastic bags assembled in Mexico
us-cbp-cross-rulings-hq-555012HQ 555012: Applicability of partial duty exemption of item 807.00, TSUS, to plastic bags assembled in MexicoGuidance
Native CBP ruling rendition. Applicability is fact-specific; modification/revocation relationships and original publisher date are retained. Publisher sentinel year0001 means unknown date, not a historical legal adoption.
HQ 555012
August 26, 1988
CLA-2 CO:R:C:V 555012 DBI
CATEGORY: Classification
TARIFF NO.: 9802.00.80; 807.00
Mr. Adolfo Loera
Twin Plant Customs Consultant
6044 Gateway East Suite 506
El Paso, Texas 79905
RE: Applicability of partial duty exemption of item
807.00, TSUS, to plastic bags assembled in Mexico
Dear Mr. Loera:
This is in response to your letters dated January 22, and
April 28, 1988, in which you request a ruling concerning the
applicability of item 807.00, Tariff Schedules of the United
States (TSUS), to plastic bags for hazardous waste removal
exported to Mexico to be assembled.
FACTS:
You advise that the sleeve component of the plastic bag will
be exported in rolls of double wound sheeting that will be cut
and heat sealed. The glove component, which is foreign, will be
sewn to the sleeves using American thread and tape. The final
assembly of the bag involves the heat sealing of the sleeves and
a pre-made tool pouch to the pre-printed bag and simultaneously
cutting arm holes in the bag. A pre-printed pressure sensitive
reinforcement label will be applied. You indicate that all of
the components are of U.S. origin except the glove component.
ISSUE:
Whether the described plastic bags, when returned to the
U.S., will be eligible for the partial exemption from duty in
item 807.00, TSUS (9802.00.80, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (HTSUS)).
LAW AND ANALYSIS:
Item 807.00, TSUS, applies to articles assembled abroad in
whole or in part of fabricated components, the products of the
U.S., with no operations performed thereon except the attachment
of the components to form the imported merchandise and operations
- 2 -
incidental thereto. An article classified under item 807.00,
TSUS, is subject to duty upon the full appraised value of the
imported article, less the cost or value of such products of the
U.S. Section 10.14(a), Customs Regulations (19 CFR 10.14(a)),
provides that the components must be in condition ready for
assembly without further fabrication at the time of their
exportation from the U.S. to qualify for the exemption.
As stated in E. Dillingham, Inc. v. United States, 60 CCPA
39, C.A.D. 1078, 470 F.2d 629 (1972), the correct starting point
for the application of item 807.00, TSUS, is the condition of the
components as "exported" from the United States. Fabricating or
non-assembly steps performed on exported components between the
time of the arrival abroad and the assembly merely show that the
exported components were not "in condition ready for assembly
without further fabrication."
We have previously held that item 807.00, TSUS, does apply
to materials exported in continuous lengths that are merely cut
to individual lengths abroad prior to assembly. However, it does
not apply to materials which are cut into specific shapes or
patterns abroad. Cutting parts to pattern shape from exported
material is a fabrication and would not be considered an
incidental operation under item 807.00, TSUS (HQ 554748, February
24, 1988).
In the present case, cutting the double wound sheeting into
sleeves would be considered cutting material into a specific
shape and, therefore, cannot be considered an acceptable assembly
operation under item 807.00, TSUS.
Sewing the glove component to the sleeves is an acceptable
assembly. However, the sleeves do not qualify for item 807.00,
TSUS, treatment for the reasons stated above and the gloves are
precluded because they are not U.S.-made.
In Rudolph Miles v. United States, 64 CCPA 24, C.A.D. 1178,
545 F.2d 739 (1976), it was held that the burning of slots and
holes into Z-beams manufactured in the U.S. did not constitute
further fabrication abroad but was incidental to the assembly of
the Z-beams into center sills for box cars. In the present case,
arm holes will be cut in the bag in order to attach the sleeves.
According to the reasoning in Miles, this operation abroad would
be incidental to the assembly of the plastic bags.
Heat sealing the pre-made tool pouch and printed bag is an
acceptable assembly since the pouch and bag are U.S.-made
- 3 -
components. Heat-sealing these two components to the sleeves is
an acceptable assembly. However, the sleeves would still not
qualify for the reasons stated above.
HOLDING:
Based on the information submitted, we are of the opinion
that only the cutting of the arm holes in the bags and the heat-
sealing of the tool pouch and printed bag are acceptable assembly
operations or operations incidental thereto. Therefore,
allowances in duty may be made under item 807.00, TSUS, for the
cost or value of the tool pouch and printed bag, upon compliance
with section 10.16, Customs Regulations (19 CFR 10.16). No
allowances may be made under item 807.00, TSUS, for the cost or
value of the glove or sleeves.
Sincerely,
John Durant, Director
Commercial Rulings Division
1cc: CO:R:C:V:DIZZO:LDC:8/22/88
Mr. Adolfo Loera
Twin Plant Customs Consultant
6044 Gateway East Suite 506
El Paso, TX 79905
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.