us-cbp-cross-rulings-hq-952021•HQ 952021: 19 CFR 174.31; where protest denied in full, protestant may seek further review by filing a civil action in the United States Court of International Trade; 28 U.S.C. 2632; San Francisco Newspaper Co. v. United States, 9 CIT 517 (1985).
HQ 952021: 19 CFR 174.31; where protest denied in full, protestant may seek further review by filing a civil action in the United States Court of International Trade; 28 U.S.C. 2632; San Francisco Newspaper Co. v. United States, 9 CIT 517 (1985).
us-cbp-cross-rulings-hq-952021HQ 952021: 19 CFR 174.31; where protest denied in full, protestant may seek further review by filing a civil action in the United States Court of International Trade; 28 U.S.C. 2632; San Francisco Newspaper Co. v. United States, 9 CIT 517 (1985).Guidance
Native CBP ruling rendition. Applicability is fact-specific; modification/revocation relationships and original publisher date are retained. Publisher sentinel year0001 means unknown date, not a historical legal adoption.
HQ 952021
September 4, 1992
CLA-2 CO:R:C:T 952021 SK
CATEGORY: Classification
Philip E. Busch
Value Vinyls
645 St. Charles Court
Arlington, TX 76013
RE: 19 CFR 174.31; where protest denied in full, protestant
may seek further review by filing a civil action in the
United States Court of International Trade; 28 U.S.C. 2632;
San Francisco Newspaper Co. v. United States, 9 CIT 517
(1985).
Dear Mr. Busch:
This is in response to your letter of May 27, 1992,
requesting reconsideration of a protest review decision issued by
this office in Headquarters Ruling Letter (HRL) 950889, dated
April 20, 1992. Protest number 5501-89-000081 was denied in
full.
The appropriate forum, should you seek further review of the
protest's denial, is the United States Court of International
Trade. Section 174.31 of the Customs Regulations (19 CFR 174.31)
provides for judicial review of denial of protest and reads:
Any person whose protest has been denied, in whole or in
part, may contest the denial by filing a civil action in
the United States Court of International Trade in
accordance with 28 U.S.C. 2632 within 180 days after -
(a) The date of mailing of notice of denial, in whole or
in part, of a protest, or
(b) The date a protest, for which accelerated disposition
was requested, is deemed to have been denied in accordance
with Section 174.22(d).
Customs does not have the authority to further
administratively consider this issue. (See San Francisco
Newspaper Co. v. United States, 9 CIT 517 (1985)). The final
- 2 -
disposition of this matter had been reached in the denial of
protest issued by this office on April 20, 1992. Any further
review must be in accordance with the Section 174.31 of the
Customs Regulations set forth above.
Sincerely,
John Durant, Director
Commercial Rulings Division
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.