us-cbp-cross-rulings-hq-953950•HQ 953950: Protest no. 3004-93-100043; Boots, golf, rubber; Footwear, protective, waterproof
HQ 953950: Protest no. 3004-93-100043; Boots, golf, rubber; Footwear, protective, waterproof
us-cbp-cross-rulings-hq-953950HQ 953950: Protest no. 3004-93-100043; Boots, golf, rubber; Footwear, protective, waterproofGuidance
Native CBP ruling rendition. Applicability is fact-specific; modification/revocation relationships and original publisher date are retained. Publisher sentinel year0001 means unknown date, not a historical legal adoption.
HQ 953950
July 6, 1993
CLA-2 CO:R:C:M 953950
CATEGORY: Classification
TARIFF NO.: 6401.92.90
District Director of Customs
U.S. Customs Service
Key Tower Bldg., #2200
1000 2nd Avenue
Seattle, Washington 98104-1049
Re: Protest no. 3004-93-100043; Boots, golf, rubber; Footwear,
protective, waterproof
Dear Sir;
This is in response to the Application for Further Review of
Protest no. 3004-93-100043, covering a shipment of certain rubber
golf boots manufactured in Malaysia. A sample was submitted for
examination.
FACTS:
The footwear involved is an over-the-ankle, slip-on, golf
boot with a rubber/plastics upper and sole. This boot is of
vulcanized construction, and contains no stitching, riveting,
nailing, screwing, plugging or similar processes, either in the
assembly of the upper or in the attachment of the upper to the
sole. This boot has a foxing, and eleven spikes attached to the
sole.
The entry covering these rubber golf boots was liquidated on
January 29, 1993, under subheading 6401.92.90, Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). The protest was timely
filed on March 23, 1993. The protestant maintains that these
rubber golf boots are properly classifiable under subheading
6402.19.90, HTSUS.
ISSUE:
Are the rubber golf boots more specifically described as
sports footwear than as waterproof footwear?
-2-
LAW AND ANALYSIS:
The competing provisions are as follows:
1. 6401 Waterproof footwear with outer soles and uppers of
rubber or plastics, the uppers of which are
neither fixed to the sole nor assembled by
stitching, riveting, nailing, screwing, plugging
or similar processes:
* * * *
Other footwear:
* * * *
6401.92 Covering the ankle but not covering the
knee:
* * * *
Other:
* * * *
6401.92.90 Other . . . . . . . . . 37.5%
2. 6402 Other footwear with outer soles and uppers of
rubber or plastics:
Sports footwear:
* * * *
Other:
Having uppers of which over 90
percent of the external surface
area (including any accessories or
reinforcements such as those
mentioned in note 4(a) to this
chapter) is rubber or plastics
(except footwear having foxing or a
foxing-like band applied or molded
at the sole and over-lapping the
upper and except footwear designed
to be worn over, or in lieu of
other footwear as a protection
against water, oil, grease or
chemicals or cold or inclement
weather)
-3-
* * * *
Other:
* * * *
6402.19.90 Valued over $12/pr. . . . 20%
Classification of goods under the HTSUS is governed by the
General Rules of Interpretation (GRI's). GRI 1 provides that
"classification shall be determined according to the terms of the
headings and any relative section or chapter notes, and, provided
such headings or notes do not otherwise require, according to
[the remaining GRI's taken in order]." In other words
classification is governed first by the terms of the headings of
the tariff and any relative section or chapter notes.
GRI 3(a), HTSUS, which is relevant here, reads as follows:
3. When, by application of rule 2(b) or for any other
reason, goods are, prima facie, classifiable under
two or more headings, classification shall be
effected as follows:
(a) The heading which provides the most specific
description shall be preferred to headings
providing a more general description. . . .
We agree that the boots are sports footwear. However,
following GRI 3(a), HTSUS, supra, the provision for "waterproof
footwear . . ." in subheading 6401.92.90, HTSUS, is clearly a
more specific provision for these boots than the provision in
subheading 6402.19.90, HTSUS, for "other footwear with outer
soles and uppers of rubber or plastics." It is also clear that
these boots meet the tariff description of "waterproof," and that
the protestant does not challenge this determination (although he
only admits that they are "protective"). Inasmuch as the rubber
golf boots are waterproof, their classification under subheading
6401.92.90, as waterproof footwear is mandated.
-4-
HOLDING:
The rubber golf boots are dutiable at the rate of 37.5% ad
valorem under subheading 6401.92.90, HTSUS.
The protest should be denied. A copy of this decision
should be attached to the Customs Form 19 and provided to the
protestant as part of the notice of action on the protest.
Sincerely,
John Durant, Director
Commercial Rulings Division
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.