FLSA2004-9 — Nurses and section 7(b)

us-dol-whd-opinion-letters-d6f2ac94914812b4f99dde681cb77936FLSA2004-9 — Nurses and section 7(b)Guidance

U.S. Department of Labor
Employment Standards Administration
Wage and Hour Division
Washington, D.C. 20210

September 9, 2004
FLSA2004-9
Working to Improve the Lives of America's Workers Page 1 of 1

Dear
Name*,

This is in response to your letter to Ms. Susan Nern of the Wage and Hour Division (WHD) in Phoenix,
Arizona regarding the payment of overtime to nurses at the
Name* of Name*. Your letter was forwarded
to this office for a reply.

You state that your union, the
Name*, represents approximately 1300 nurses at Name* and you have
been considering how the overtime provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) might be applied to
them. You state that Section 7(j) is not feasible, and that you would prefer the implementation of an
agreement under either Section 7(b)(1) or 7(b)(2) of the FLSA instead.

As you know, Sections 7(b)(1) and 7(b)(2) contain requirements concerning the number of overtime hours
that may be worked and, also, both sections require that the overtime agreement may be reached only as
the result of collective bargaining by employee representatives certified as bona fide by the National
Labor Relations Board (NLRB). Your concern is that, although you are the bona fide representatives for
Name* employees, you are not certified by the NLRB. Instead, you are certified by the Local
Government Employee-Management Relations Board, a board that you describe as “essentially the state
equivalent” of the NLRB. You explain that because
Name* is considered a local governmental body, you
are subject to the State collective bargaining statute (Nevada Revised Statutes 288.010 et seq.). You
enclose a copy of a case by the Supreme Court of the State of Nevada which mentions that the state’s
Employee-Management Relations Board was patterned after the NLRB and you ask whether it would be
acceptable to implement a Section 7(b) agreement under the auspices of a bargaining agent certified by a
state rather than the NLRB.

Section 7(b) requires certification of the collective bargaining representative by the NLRB. No exception
has been provided which would allow a Section 7(b) agreement negotiated by a bargaining agent certified
by the State of Nevada, rather than the NLRB. The FLSA does not, however, require use of the Board’s
procedures for certification of the union as the exclusive bargaining representative of the employees
within a particular bargaining unit for the purposes of the National Labor Relations Act. Certification by the
NLRB for the purposes of section 7(b) can be a relatively routine matter, initiated by a letter of request.
Enclosure of evidence that your union is certified by the Employee-Management Relations Board might
facilitate certification by the NLRB.

This opinion is based exclusively on the facts and circumstances described in your request and is given
on the basis of your representation, explicit or implied, that you have provided a full and fair description of
all the facts and circumstances which would be pertinent to our consideration of the question presented.
Existence of any other factual or historical background not contained in your request might require a
different conclusion than the one expressed herein. You have also represented that this opinion is not
sought by a party to pending litigation concerning the issue addressed herein. You have also represented
that this opinion is not sought in connection with an investigation or litigation between a client or firm and
the Wage and Hour Division or the Department of Labor.

We trust that the above information is responsive to your inquiry.

Sincerely,

Alfred B. Robinson, Jr.,
Acting Administrator

Note: * The actual name(s) was removed to preserve privacy.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.