Process to Request a Review of FDA's Decision Not to Issue Certain Export Certificates for Devices: Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff

us-fda-guidance-43c54806f4ef92302ef381674497d6afProcess to Request a Review of FDA's Decision Not to Issue Certain Export Certificates for Devices: Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration StaffGuidance

Administrative guidance, not enacted legislation. This captured publisher edition preserves the listed document and attachments; later developments are not independently consolidated.

Docket Number:
FDA-2018-D-2310
Issued by:
Guidance Issuing Office
Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research

FDA is issuing this guidance to make minor updates to align with section 3304 of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023, Pub. L. No. 117-32, which directs FDA to provide certification for devices that are not exported from the United States (CFG-NEs). This guidance describes the information that the Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) and the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER), in collaboration with the Office of Regulatory Affairs (ORA), will provide to a person whose request for a Certificate to Foreign Government (CFG) for a device is denied, and the process for seeking review of such a denial. The updated guidance explains that the processes referenced in the guidance apply to CFG-NEs as well as CFGs, pursuant to FD&C Act section 801(e)(4)(F)(iv), unless otherwise specified.


Submit Comments

You can submit online or written comments on any guidance at any time (see 21 CFR 10.115(g)(5))

If unable to submit comments online, please mail written comments to:

Dockets Management
Food and Drug Administration
5630 Fishers Lane, Rm 1061
Rockville, MD 20852

All written comments should be identified with this document's docket number: FDA-2018-D-2310.

Contains Nonbinding Recommendations
Process to Request a Review of FDA's
Decision Not to Issue Certain Export
Certificates for Devices
Guidance for Industry and
Food and Drug Administration Staff
Document issued on November 3, 2023.
Document originally issued on November 14, 2019.
This document supersedes Process to Request a Review of FDA's Decision Not
to Issue Certain Export Certificates for Devices, issued November 2020.
For questions about this document regarding CDRH-regulated devices, contact the Exports Team
within ORP: Office of Regulatory Programs/DRP2: Division of Establishment Support at
exportcert@cdrh.fda.gov or 301-796-7400, option 3.
For questions about this document regarding CBER-regulated devices, contact the Office of
Communication, Outreach, and Development (OCOD) at 800-835-4709 or 240-402-8010, or by
email at ocod@fda.hhs.gov.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Food and Drug Administration
Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research
Contains Nonbinding Recommendations
Preface
Public Comment
You may submit electronic comments and suggestions at any time for Agency consideration to
https://www.regulations.gov. Submit written comments to the Dockets Management Staff, Food
and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Room 1061, (HFA-305), Rockville, MD 20852-
1740. Identify all comments with the docket number FDA-2018-D-2310. Comments may not be
acted upon by the Agency until the document is next revised or updated.
Additional Copies
CDRH
Additional copies are available from the Internet. You may also send an e-mail request to
CDRH-Guidance@fda.hhs.gov to receive a copy of the guidance. Please include the document
number GUI00017044 and complete title of the guidance in the request.
CBER
Additional copies are available from the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER),
Office of Communication, Outreach, and Development (OCOD), 10903 New Hampshire Ave.,
WO71, Room 3128, Silver Spring, MD 20903, or by calling 1-800-835-4709 or 240-402-8010,
by email, ocod@fda.hhs.gov, or from the Internet at https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-
biologics/guidance-compliance-regulatory-information-biologics/biologics-guidances.
Contains Nonbinding Recommendations
Table of Contents
I. Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 1
II. Scope ....................................................................................................................................... 2
III. Denial of a Request to Issue a CFG or CFG-NE .................................................................... 2
A. Grounds for Denial ........................................................................................................... 2
B. Plan of Correction ............................................................................................................ 4
IV. Review of FDA Denial of a CFG or CFG-NE Request .......................................................... 5
A. Review Pursuant to Section 801(e)(4)(E)(ii)(I) ............................................................... 5
B. Review of New Information Pursuant to Section 801(e)(4)(E)(ii)(II) ............................. 6
Contains Nonbinding Recommendations
1
Process to Request a Review of FDA's
Decision Not to Issue Certain Export
Certificates for Devices
Guidance for Industry and
Food and Drug Administration Staff
This guidance represents the current thinking of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA or
Agency) on this topic. It does not establish any rights for any person and is not binding on
FDA or the public. You can use an alternative approach if it satisfies the requirements of the
applicable statutes and regulations. To discuss an alternative approach, contact the FDA staff
or Office responsible for this guidance as listed on the title page.
I. Introduction1
FDA is reissuing this guidance document to make minor updates to align with section 3304 of
the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023, Pub. L. No. 117-32.2 The original version of this
guidance was issued to comply with section 704 of the FDA Reauthorization Act of 2017
(FDARA) (Public Law 115-52), which amended section 801(e)(4) of the Federal Food, Drug,
and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act) to specify the process afforded to persons denied a Certificate to
Foreign Government (CFG) for a device.
This guidance describes the information that the Center for Devices and Radiological Health
(CDRH) and the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER), in collaboration with
the Office of Regulatory Affairs (ORA), will provide to a person whose request for a CFG or
CFG-NE for a device is denied, and the process for seeking review of such a denial.
In general, FDA’s guidance documents do not establish legally enforceable responsibilities.
Instead, guidances describe the Agency’s current thinking on a topic and should be viewed only
as recommendations, unless specific regulatory or statutory requirements are cited. The use of
1 This guidance has been prepared by the Center for Devices and Radiological Health and the Center for Biologics
Evaluation and Research in consultation with Office of Regulatory Affairs.
2 Section 3304 of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023 directs FDA to provide certification for devices that
are not exported from the United States if certain conditions are met. Section 3304 strikes clause iii of section
801(e)(4)(E) of the FD&C Act and adds subparagraph (F), to provide that the requirements and procedures of
subparagraph (E) apply to a denial of a certification under subparagraph (F) for a device not exported from the
United States.
Contains Nonbinding Recommendations
2
the word should in Agency guidances means that something is suggested or recommended, but
not required.
II. Scope
This guidance applies to the process for persons denied CFGs requested pursuant to section
801(e)(4)(A)(ii) of the FD&C Act or denied CFG-NEs requested pursuant to section 801(e)(4)(F)
of the FD&C Act for devices manufactured in an establishment registered under section 510 of
the FD&C Act (e.g., FDA-approved, cleared, or exempted devices). Specifically, this guidance
describes the information that CDRH and CBER, in collaboration with ORA, will provide to a
person whose request for a CFG or CFG-NE is denied, and the process for seeking review of
such a denial.3
Section 801(e)(4)(A)(ii) of the FD&C Act applies to export certificates for devices, as well as
other FDA-regulated products, that are exported from the United States. Such FDA export
certifications provide information concerning a product and/or establishment’s regulatory or
marketing status, based on available information at the time FDA issues the certification
(including, as appropriate, attestations provided by the person seeking the export certification).
Upon issuance, FDA certifies in writing that the exported product meets applicable requirements
of the FD&C Act.4 Revisions to section 801(e)(4) of the FD&C Act as part of the Consolidated
Appropriations Act, 2023, direct FDA to provide certification for devices that are not exported
from the United States. Manufacturers of devices not exported from the United States, as
described in section 801(e)(4)(F) of the FD&C Act, may not request CFGs pursuant to section
801(e)(4)(A)(ii) of the FD&C Act, but may request a Certificate to Foreign Government for
Device Not Exported from the United States (CFG-NE).5 Although CFG-NEs apply to devices
not exported from the United States, the processes referenced below also apply to CFG-NEs,
pursuant to section 801(e)(4)(F)(iv) of the FD&C Act, unless otherwise specified.
III. Denial of a Request to Issue a CFG or CFG NE
A. Grounds for Denial
Among the reasons FDA may deny a request for issuance of a CFG or CFG-NE are those
referenced in section 801(e)(4)(E)(i)(II) of the FD&C Act:
1. There is an injunction proceeding pursuant to section 302 of the FD&C Act; or
2. There is a seizure action pursuant to section 304 of the FD&C Act; or
3. The device is the subject of a recall designated by FDA as Class I or Class II (in accordance
with 21 CFR part 7); or
3 For additional information regarding FDA export certificates, see the FDA guidance entitled “FDA Export
Certification” at https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/fda-export-
certification
4 Section 801(e)(4)(A)(ii) of the FD&C Act.
5 See https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/exporting-medical-devices/devices-not-exported-united-states for
information about FDA’s CFG-NE process.
Contains Nonbinding Recommendations
3
4. An establishment is out of compliance6 with FDA’s Quality System regulation (also known
as current Good Manufacturing Practices (cGMPs)) under 21 CFR part 820.
In addition to the above reasons, FDA may deny a request for issuance of a CFG-NE if any of
the conditions specified in section 801(e)(4)(F)(i) of the FD&C Act are not met, such as the
device is not imported or offered for import into the United States.
If FDA denies a request for a CFG or CFG-NE for these or other reasons, FDA will notify the
requestor via email, identify the basis for denying the request, and specifically identify the
finding upon which such denial is based.7 For denials based on a facility being out of compliance
with cGMPs (reason 4, above), and not on the basis of an injunction, seizure, or recall, FDA will
include a substantive summary of the specific grounds for noncompliance with the email.8
Within the summary, FDA will describe the major noncompliance issues that are the basis for the
denial and associated reference to the Quality System regulation. The level of detail will vary
based on the specific facts of each individual case. FDA does not intend to deny a CFG or CFG-
NE for an establishment with a No Action Indicated (NAI) or Voluntary Action Indicated (VAI)
classification for the most recent quality system inspection.
There may be instances where a CFG or CFG-NE is requested by a party that has a business
relationship with an establishment that has a different owner/operator number. If the CFG or
CFG-NE is denied because such establishment is found to be out of compliance, the CFG or
CFG-NE requestor will receive a denial email indicating that the denial is based on matters
pertaining to that establishment. However, pursuant to applicable disclosure requirements,9 the
substantive summary will not be emailed to the CFG or CFG-NE requestor, but to the out-of-
compliance establishment via the owner, operator, or agent in charge of the establishment, if the
CFG or CFG-NE requestor agrees that its pending CFG or CFG-NE request can be made known
to the other establishment.
For open recalls, the Agency intends to base its decision to issue a CFG or CFG-NE on the
current status of the recalled products. For example, if a party requests a CFG or CFG-NE for a
recalled product that has been corrected, FDA will review documentation of the correction and
final testing of the product, per the current recall review process, to determine whether a CFG or
CFG-NE should be issued.
For a product line with an open lot-specific recall, lots not under recall may be included on a
CFG or CFG-NE provided the firm signs a statement indicating that it will not ship the lots of the
product that are subject to the recall.
6 For the purposes of this guidance, “out of compliance” is synonymous with “noncompliance.” “Out of
compliance” means having one or more major deficiencies with the Quality System regulation, per Compliance
Program Guidance Manual 7382.845 Part V, available at https://www.fda.gov/media/80195/download.
7 See section 801(e)(4)(E)(i)(I) of the FD&C Act.
8 See section 801(e)(4)(E)(i)(II) of the FD&C Act.
9 Trade secrets and confidential commercial information (CCI) are protected from public disclosure by the Trade
Secrets Act (18 USC 1905), Exemption 4 of the Freedom of Information Act (5 USC 552(b)(4)), and FDA’s
disclosure regulations (21 CFR 20.61).
Contains Nonbinding Recommendations
4
B. Plan of Correction
The firm may submit a plan of correction after it has received the substantive summary of the
specific grounds for noncompliance (reason 4, described above). Section 801(e)(4)(E)(i)(III) and
section 801(e)(4)(F)(iv) of the FD&C Act provide that FDA shall not deny a request for a CFG
or CFG-NE based solely on the grounds that the device at issue was manufactured in an
establishment that has received an FDA Inspectional Observations form (Form FDA 483), issued
under section 704(b) of the FD&C Act, if FDA and the owner, operator, or agent in charge of
such establishment have agreed to a plan of correction in response to the report. For purposes of
this guidance, FDA interprets “plan of correction” to mean a response to an FDA Inspectional
Observations, issued under section 704(b) of the FD&C Act.
For FDA and the owner, operator, or agent in charge of the establishment to agree on a plan of
correction in response to the inspectional observations, for CFG or CFG-NE consideration, the
following steps should occur:
1. The owner, operator, or agent in charge of the establishment should submit, via email, a plan
that includes steps the owner, operator, or agent in charge of the establishment is taking to
address, and prevent the recurrence of, the inspectional observations, and timeframes for
completing such actions. This “plan of correction” should also include documentation
demonstrating the corrective/preventative actions that have been taken and/or will be taken.
· To submit a plan of correction, the owner, operator, or agent in charge of the
establishment should email the FDA contact identified by the investigator at the end of
the inspection for submission of a response to the Form FDA 483.
· The email subject line should clearly state “Plan of Correction,” along with the
establishment name and FDA Establishment Identifier (FEI) number.
2. FDA will review the plan and notify the owner, operator, or agent in charge of the
establishment via email whether the plan is sufficient to address the violations documented in
the inspectional observations. If the Agency finds that clarification on the submitted plan of
correction is needed, the Agency may, at its discretion, initiate further communication with
the owner, operator, or agent in charge of the establishment prior to making a decision.
Generally, depending upon the Agency’s resources, the complexity of the noncompliance
issues presented, and the responsiveness of the owner, operator, or agent in charge of the
establishment, FDA intends to provide a response to a plan of correction within 90 days.
3. If the plan is determined to be sufficient, and a CFG or CFG-NE application is currently
under review10 or subsequently submitted to the Agency, FDA will issue a CFG or CFG-NE,
if no other grounds for denial are present.
10 The FD&C Act limits the processing of a CFG request to within 20 working days of receipt of the request (section
801(e)(4)(A)(ii) of the FD&C Act. As such, it may be necessary for the establishment to submit a new CFG
application. As indicated in the Guidance “FDA Export Certification” (https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-
information/search-fda-guidance-documents/fda-export-certification), FDA “has interpreted the 20-day period to
mean 20 government working days.”
Contains Nonbinding Recommendations
5
If an establishment is implementing a plan of correction and determines that modifications to the
plan are necessary, it should notify FDA of the modifications via the previously identified
contact information.
IV. Review of FDA Denial of a CFG or CFG NE Request
The CDRH Exports Team and the CBER Import and Export Staff will make every effort to
directly resolve issues. In addition, the statute provides that persons denied a CFG or CFG-NE
may request review of the Agency’s decision, and outlines two distinct types of review. The
process for requesting such reviews is outlined below.
A. Review Pursuant to Section 801(e)(4)(E)(ii)(I)
Section 801(e)(4)(E)(ii)(I) and section 801(e)(4)(F)(iv) of the FD&C Act direct FDA to provide
a process for a person who is denied a CFG or CFG-NE for a device to request a review that
conforms to the standards of section 517A(b) of the FD&C Act. CDRH’s review process11
follows the standards of section 517A by providing for supervisory review, opportunity for a
meeting or teleconference, and timeframes, except it does not adopt the specific timeframes set
forth in section 517A(b)(2)&(3). FDA will strive to meet the timeframes outlined in 517A(b)(3);
however, efforts to resolve any issues raised by a person whose request for a CFG or CFG-NE is
denied may take up to, or more than, 30 days to be completed. In addition, since the denial of a
request to issue a CFG or CFG-NE is not a “significant decision” as defined in section
517A(a)(1), CDRH’s review process will not include the 30-day timeframe for submitting a
request for review. Similarly, CBER will use the Formal Dispute Resolution process12 for
submitting a request for review, but the efforts by the CBER Import and Export Staff to resolve
any issues raised by a person whose request for a CFG or CFG-NE is denied may take up to, or
more than, 30 days to be completed.
The request for a review of FDA’s decision not to issue a CFG or CFG-NE should be submitted
no later than 60 calendar days from the denial date by emailing the Exports Team within
CDRH’s Office of Regulatory Programs (ORP), Division of Establishment Support using
exportcert@cdrh.fda.gov, or the CBER ombudsman using cberombudsman@fda.hhs.gov.
A request for review of a CFG or CFG-NE denial should include the following:
· An email subject line that states: “Request for Review of FDA’s Decision to Deny a CFG
or CFG-NE” and the CFG or CFG-NE application number;
11 For additional information regarding appeal review processes in CDRH, specifically appeals of actions that are
not significant decisions, please see the guidance “Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) Appeals
Processes,” available at: https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/center-
devices-and-radiological-health-cdrh-appeals-processes
12 For additional information regarding appeal review processes in CBER, please see the guidance, “Formal Dispute
Resolution: Sponsor Appeals Above the Division Level,” available at https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-
information/search-fda-guidance-documents/formal-dispute-resolution-sponsor-appeals-above-division-level-
guidance-industry-and-review-staff
Contains Nonbinding Recommendations
6
· The name, title, firm, address, phone number, and email address of the person submitting
the request;
· The name, address, and FEI number of the establishment for which the CFG or CFG-NE
was denied;
· A clear reference to the inspectional observation(s) as noted in the substantive summary
of the denial; and
· Information demonstrating why the request for CFG or CFG- NE should not have been
denied, referencing previously submitted documentation.
This review process consists of a supervisory review, including an in-person meeting or
teleconference, if requested.
B. Review of New Information Pursuant to Section
801(e)(4)(E)(ii)(II)
A person who has been denied a CFG or CFG-NE “may at any time request a review in order to
present new information relating to actions taken by such person to address the reasons identified
by [FDA] for the denial of [the CFG or CFG-NE], including evidence that corrective actions are
being or have been implemented to address grounds for noncompliance identified by [FDA]”
(section 801(e)(4)(E)(ii)(II) and section 801(e)(4)(F)(iv) of the FD&C Act.
The owner, operator, or agent in charge of the establishment can request such a review by
contacting CDRH’s Exports Team at exportcert@cdrh.fda.gov or CBER Import and Export Staff
within the Office of Compliance and Biologics Quality (OCBQ), Division of Case Management
(DCM) at CBERBECATS@fda.hhs.gov. A person requesting a review of new information
should reference, but need not re-submit, inspection related documentation previously submitted
to FDA.
A request for review of new information pertaining to a CFG or CFG-NE denial should include
the same information as listed above in section IV.A., except the email subject line should state:
“New Information – Denial of a CFG or CFG-NE” and the CFG or CFG-NE application number.
CBER and CDRH will review the new information in collaboration with ORA and intend to
provide a response within 90 days, depending upon the Agency’s resources, the complexity of
the noncompliance issues presented, and the responsiveness of the establishment.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.