us-fda-guidance-5795531f92504bd48fe55bd27815eb8c•Bioresearch Monitoring Technical Conformance Guide
Bioresearch Monitoring Technical Conformance Guide
us-fda-guidance-5795531f92504bd48fe55bd27815eb8cBioresearch Monitoring Technical Conformance GuideGuidance
Administrative guidance, not enacted legislation. This captured publisher edition preserves the listed document and attachments; later developments are not independently consolidated.
- Docket Number:
- FDA-2018-D-1216
- Issued by:
- Guidance Issuing OfficeCenter for Drug Evaluation and Research
This technical conformance guide represents the current thinking of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA or Agency) on this topic. It does not establish any rights for any person and is not binding on FDA or the public. You can use an alternative approach if it satisfies the requirements of the applicable statutes and regulations. If you want to discuss an alternative approach, contact the FDA staff responsible for this technical conformance guide. If you cannot identify the appropriate FDA staff, send an email to cder-edata@fda.hhs.gov or cber.cdisc@fda.hhs.gov.
Submit Comments
You can submit online or written comments on any guidance at any time (see 21 CFR 10.115(g)(5))
If unable to submit comments online, please mail written comments to:
Dockets Management
Food and Drug Administration
5630 Fishers Lane, Rm 1061
Rockville, MD 20852
All written comments should be identified with this document's docket number: FDA-2018-D-1216.
Contains Nonbinding Recommendations BIORESEARCH MONITORING TECHNICAL CONFORMANCE GUIDE Technical Specifications Document This Document is Referenced by the Following Draft Guidance Document: Standardized Format for Electronic Submission of NDA and BLA Content for the Planning of Bioresearch Monitoring (BIMO) Inspections for CDER Submissions For questions regarding this technical specifications document, contact CDER-BIMO- NDA-BLA-request@fda.hhs.gov. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) September 2024
Contains Nonbinding Recommendations BIORESEARCH MONITORING TECHNICAL CONFORMANCE GUIDE September 2024
Contains Nonbinding Recommendations Revision History Date Version Summary of Changes 12/28/2017 1.0 Original Version 07/23/2020 2.0 1. Corrected footnote hyperlinks 2. Edited variable names in examples and tables to maintain consistency across document 3. Clarified document, listings, and data requests 4. Deleted request for SITEFFE and SITEFFS variables in clinsite.xpt 5. Added COHORT variable 6. Revised PROTVIOL variable to IMPDEV and NOIMPDEV variables 7. Provided additional instructions for placement of files per eCTD format 08/11/2022 3.0 1. Rename BIMO Review Guide to BIMO Data Review Guide. 2. Renamed TRTEFFR to TRTEFFR1 3. Added EFFPOP, TRTEFFR2, and CENSOR2 Variables 4. Deleted request for TRTEFFS 5. Change instructions for use of ISO codes to use of Geopolitical Entities, Names and Codes (GENC) codelist. 6. Minor editorial changes. 09/03/2024 3.1 1. Updated introductory language
Contains Nonbinding Recommendations TABLE OF CONTENTS I. CLINICAL STUDY-LEVEL INFORMATION 1 A. COMPREHENSIVE AND R EADILY LOCATED L IST OF A LL CLINICAL S ITES ......................................................... 1 B. TABLE LISTING A LL ENTITIES TO W HOM S PONSOR H AS C ONTRACTED C LINICAL S TUDY-R ELATED A CTIVITIES ....................................................................................................................................................... 1 C. P ROTOCOL, P ROTOCOL A MENDMENTS , AND A NNOTATED C ASE R EPORT F ORM ............................................... 2 II. SUBJECT-LEVEL DATA LINE LISTINGS BY CLINICAL SITE 2 A. O RGANIZATION OF THE S UBJECT-L EVEL D ATA LINE L ISTINGS ........................................................................ 2 B. S ITE-S PECIFIC LISTINGS F ORMAT ..................................................................................................................... 4 III. SUMMARY-LEVEL CLINICAL SITE DATASET 5 A. O RGANIZATION OF THE S ITE-L EVEL D ATASET ................................................................................................. 5 B. V ARIABLES AND V ARIABLE N AMES FOR S ITE -S PECIFIC EFFICACY RESULTS .................................................... 5 C. CREATING THE D ATA F ILE (T EMPLATE AND S TRUCTURE) ................................................................................ 7 IV. SUBMITTING BIMO CLINICAL DATA IN THE ECTD FORMAT 7 A. S TUDY TAGGING F ILE ....................................................................................................................................... 7 B. ECTD F OLDER S TRUCTURE FOR CLINICAL S TUDY-L EVEL I NFORMATION AND S UBJECT-L EVEL LINE LISTINGS BY CLINICAL S ITE ............................................................................................................................................. 8 C. ECTD F OLDER S TRUCTURE FOR S UMMARY-L EVEL C LINICAL S ITE D ATASET .................................................. 8 D. F ILE F ORMAT .................................................................................................................................................... 9 E. LEAF TITLES ..................................................................................................................................................... 9 F. S UBMISSION ...................................................................................................................................................... 9 APPENDIX 1: CLINICAL STUDY-LEVEL INFORMATION 11 APPENDIX 2: FORMATTING SUBJECT-LEVEL DATA LINE LISTINGS BY CLINICAL SITE 12 APPENDIX 3: CLINICAL SITE DATA ELEMENTS SUMMARY LISTING 14 APPENDIX 4: EXAMPLES 19
Contains Nonbinding Recommendations 1 Bioresearch Monitoring Technical Conformance Guide 1 2 This technical conformance guide represents the current thinking of the Food and Drug 3 Administration (FDA or Agency) on this topic. It does not establish any rights for any person 4 and is not binding on FDA or the public. You can use an alternative approach if it satisfies the 5 requirements of the applicable statutes and regulations. If you want to discuss an alternative 6 approach, contact the FDA staff responsible for this technical conformance guide. If you cannot 7 identify the appropriate FDA staff, send an email to cder-edata@fda.hhs.gov or 8 cber.cdisc@fda.hhs.gov. 9 10 This Bioresearch Monitoring Technical Conformance Guide (Guide) provides current FDA 11 specifications, recommendations, and general considerations for preparing and submitting 12 Clinical Study-Level Information, Subject-Level Data Line Listings by Clinical Site, and a 13 Summary-Level Clinical Site Dataset that are used by the Center for Drug Evaluation and 14 Research (CDER) for planning of Bioresearch Monitoring (BIMO) inspections in electronic 15 format for new drug applications (NDAs), biologics license applications (BLAs), and NDA or 16 BLA supplemental applications containing clinical data that are regulated by CDER.1 It also 17 applies when these data and information are submitted under certain investigational new drug 18 applications2 (INDs) in advance of a planned NDA, BLA, or supplemental submission. 19 20 21 I. CLINICAL STUDY-LEVEL INFORMATION 22 23 A. Comprehensive and Readily Located List of All Clinical Sites 24 25 The recommended format for the portable document format (PDF) of the comprehensive and 26 readily located list(s) of all clinical sites that participated in clinical studies for each major (i.e., 27 pivotal) study is provided in Appendix 1 of this Guide. 28 29 B. Table Listing All Entities To Whom Sponsor Has Contracted Clinical Study- 30 Related Activities 31 32 In the table(s) listing entities to whom the sponsor has contracted clinical study-related activities, 33 which are provided in a PDF for each pivotal study, the applicant should identify the location of 34 study-related documents for each study and whether they are sponsor- or Contract Research 35 Organization-generated. For example, these documents may include, but are not limited to, 36 monitoring plans and reports, training records, and data analysis plans (e.g., items that some 37 applicants organize in a Trial Master File). When the location of study-related documents has 38 not been finalized, the applicant should provide contact information (i.e., phone number and 39 1 We update technical conformance guides periodically. For the most recent version of this Guide, check the FDA guidance web page at https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents. 2 See FDA guidance for industry Providing Regulatory Submissions in Electronic Format – Certain Human Pharmaceutical Product Applications and Related Submissions Using the eCTD Specifications (February 2020). We update guidances periodically. For the most recent version of a guidance, check the FDA guidance web page at https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents.
Contains Nonbinding Recommendations 2 email address) for the individual(s) who can provide updated location information upon request. 40 This information ensures that when CDER issues an inspection assignment for the application, 41 the inspection is of the most responsible entity for a given regulatory responsibility, and that the 42 inspection assignment is issued for the location where records are present for review. 43 44 C. Protocol, Protocol Amendments, and Annotated Case Report Form 45 46 The protocol and protocol amendments, with associated versions of the case report form, and the 47 final version of the annotated case report form (case report form containing Clinical Data 48 Interchange Standards Consortium and Study Data Tabulation Model (SDTM) annotations) are 49 generally included in Appendix 163 of the Clinical Study Report or in the datasets folder for each 50 study. When these items are included in an appendix to the Clinical Study Report or the dataset 51 folder for the study, there is no need to resubmit them. If the applicant is submitting a BIMO 52 Data Reviewer’s Guide,4 the applicant should note that these items are present in an appendix of 53 the Clinical Study Report or the dataset folder where they are placed. 54 55 These items are included in the background materials provided to the Office of Regulatory 56 Affairs for BIMO inspections; it is important to provide all versions of these documents so that 57 the field investigator performing the inspection can reference the correct versions of protocols 58 and case report forms in place at the time of the conduct of specific study procedures. 59 60 61 II. SUBJECT-LEVEL DATA LINE LISTINGS BY CLINICAL SITE 62 63 A. Organization of the Subject-Level Data Line Listings 64 65 Examples of the formatting for the PDF of subject-level data line listings provided for each 66 major (i.e., pivotal) study used to support safety and efficacy in the application, including studies 67 with different treatment indications, are provided in Appendix 2 of this Guide. If the sponsor 68 believes alternative listings or formats are preferable for its submission, proposed alternatives 69 should be discussed with the Office of Scientific Investigations in advance of the application 70 submission—for example, before or during pre-NDA or pre-BLA meetings. 71 72 For clinical investigator sites involved in multiple studies in support of an application, the 73 subject listings should be provided independently for each study within the study-associated 74 PDF. 75 76 Subject-level data line listings, by clinical site, should include consented subjects, treatment 77 assignment, discontinuations, study population, inclusion and exclusion criteria, adverse events, 78 protocol deviations, efficacy endpoints, concomitant medications, and safety monitoring, as 79 further described below. 80 81 3 See ICH guidance for industry E3 Structure and Content of Clinical Study Reports (July 1996). 4 A specific template for a BIMO Data Reviewer’s Guide is not specified. However, an example can be found at https://advance.phuse.global/display/WEL/Deliverables.
Contains Nonbinding Recommendations 3 1. Consented Subjects 82 83 This by-subject, by-clinical site listing includes all subjects that consented to enroll in the study. 84 Consented subjects that were screen failures should also be included. For subjects that consented 85 but were not randomized to treatment or did not receive investigational product, the specific 86 reason they were not randomized or treated should be included in this listing. 87 88 2. Treatment Assignment 89 90 This by-subject, by-clinical site listing includes the treatment assignment to which the subject 91 was randomized. If a subject mistakenly received treatment different from the subject’s assigned 92 treatment for any duration of time, the actual treatment received should also be included. 93 94 3. Discontinuations 95 96 This by-subject, by-clinical site listing includes: 97 98 • All subjects that discontinued during run-in period (if applicable) 99 • All subjects that discontinued from study treatment 100 • All subjects that discontinued from the study completely 101 102 For each subject, the date of and reason for discontinuation should be provided. 103 104 4. Study Population 105 106 This by-subject, by-clinical site listing identifies the protocol-defined study population in which 107 each subject was analyzed (e.g., intent-to-treat, safety, per protocol). For subjects that did not 108 meet criteria for inclusion in the per-protocol population, the reason they were excluded from the 109 per-protocol population should be provided. 110 111 5. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria 112 113 This by-subject, by-clinical site listing should display whether each subject met each inclusion 114 and exclusion criterion defined in the protocol. 115 116 6. Adverse Events 117 118 This by-subject, by-clinical site listing should include all adverse events (i.e., nonserious adverse 119 events and serious adverse events, including deaths), date of occurrence and time if collected, 120 treatment(s) administered, severity, whether considered serious by the clinical investigator, 121 whether considered serious by the sponsor, action taken, whether the event led to discontinuation 122 of study therapy, and outcome/date of resolution. 123 124 7. Protocol Deviations 125 126
Contains Nonbinding Recommendations 4 This by-subject, by-clinical site listing should include all protocol deviations. The listing should 127 include a description of the deviation and identify whether the sponsor considered the deviation 128 to be an important or non-important protocol deviation.5 129 130 8. Efficacy Endpoints 131 132 This by-subject, by-clinical site listing(s) should contain primary and key secondary efficacy 133 parameters or events. For derived or calculated endpoints, the raw data points used to generate 134 the derived or calculated endpoint should be provided. For example, when efficacy endpoints 135 are assessed based on a laboratory, imaging, components of a clinical outcome assessment(s), or 136 other study procedures, the by-subject, by-clinical site listing should include all testing results 137 that contribute to the derived efficacy endpoint. When efficacy endpoints are collected as 138 clinical events, a by-subject, by-clinical site listing should be provided that includes clinical 139 event, date of event, and when adjudicated, the date of adjudication and the outcome of the 140 adjudication process. 141 142 9. Concomitant Medications 143 144 This by-subject, by-clinical site listing should contain all concomitant medications as specified 145 by the protocol. The date started, date stopped, dose, route of administration, and reason for 146 administration should be included. 147 148 10. Safety Monitoring 149 150 This by-subject, by-clinical site listing(s) should contain results of tests (e.g., laboratory, 151 electrocardiogram) performed for safety monitoring as defined in the protocol. When safety 152 endpoints are collected as clinical events, a by-subject, by-clinical site listing should be provided 153 that includes clinical event, date of event, and when adjudicated, the outcome of the adjudication 154 process. 155 156 B. Site-Specific Listings Format 157 158 The specified data line listings are anticipated to fit reporting requirements for most applications. 159 If a sponsor believes additional listings are needed to permit FDA to verify key study data during 160 inspections, additional listings should be included. If the size of the PDF file exceeds 500 161 megabytes, it should be split into smaller components.6 162 163 Although listings are currently requested in PDF format, CDER is in the process of developing 164 tools to extract site-specific listings, needed for inspectional purposes, from submitted Clinical 165 Data Interchange Standards Consortium, SDTM, and Analysis Data Model (ADaM) datasets and 166 intends to make those tools available in the future. FDA intends to update these technical 167 5 See ICH guidance for industry E3 Structure and Content of Clinical Study Reports — Questions and Answers (R1) (January 2013). 6 See ICH guideline Specification for Submission Formats for eCTD v1.3 (June 2021) at https://www.ich.org/page/ich-m8-specification-submission-formats-ectd.
Contains Nonbinding Recommendations 5 specifications to include details for the submission of SDTM and ADaM datasets, including 168 controlled terminology standards. In anticipation of the development of CDER tools for 169 extraction of by-site, by-subject data listings, sponsors should ensure that they are prepared to 170 submit clinical study data using standards specified in the Data Standards Catalog.7 171 172 173 III. SUMMARY-LEVEL CLINICAL SITE DATASET 174 175 A. Organization of the Site-Level Dataset 176 177 A single summary-level clinical site dataset that contains data from all major (i.e., pivotal) 178 studies used to support safety and efficacy in the application, including studies with different 179 treatment indications, should be provided. 180 181 For each major (i.e., pivotal) study used to support safety and efficacy, data by clinical site and 182 treatment arm for the safety population (SAFPOP) and primary efficacy population (EFFPOP) 183 should be provided. 184 185 For clinical investigator sites involved in multiple studies in support of an application, the site 186 data should be reported independently for each study within the dataset. 187 188 B. Variables and Variable Names for Site-Specific Efficacy Results 189 190 For each study and investigator site, it is critical to submit the following variables associated 191 with efficacy and their variable names: 192 • Safety Population (SAFPOP) — Total number of subjects in safety population at a given 193 site by treatment arm. When a subject has transferred from one site to another, the 194 applicant should handle reporting of such subjects consistently across sites and include in 195 the define file, or the BIMO Data Review Guide when one is provided, the reporting 196 convention used. 197 • Primary Efficacy Population (EFFPOP) — Total number of subjects in the primary efficacy 198 population, as defined in the clinical study report, at a given site by treatment arm to support 199 the proposed indication in the application. The efficacy population used should be identified 200 in the define file provided for the clinsite.xpt (e.g., Full Analysis Set, Per Protocol, Intent to 201 Treat, Modified Intent to Treat). 202 • Treatment Efficacy Result One (TRTEFFR1) — The summary statistic for each primary 203 efficacy endpoint, by treatment arm at a site, based subjects in the SAFPOP. Values reported 204 in TRTEFFR1 generally reflect simple summary statistics for the primary efficacy 205 endpoint(s). The method used for deriving the TRTEFFR1, including a description of which 206 analysis datasets and associated variables are used to derive the TRTEFFR1, should be 207 described in the define file provided with the clinsite.xpt (see discussion below for examples 208 of summary statistics according to different types of efficacy endpoints). 209 7 Available at http://www.fda.gov/forindustry/datastandards/studydatastandards/default.htm.
Contains Nonbinding Recommendations 6 • Treatment Efficacy Result Two (TRTEFFR2) —The summary statistic for each primary 210 efficacy endpoint, by treatment arm at a site, based subjects in the EFFPOP. Values reported 211 in TRTEFFR2 generally reflect simple summary statistics for the primary efficacy 212 endpoint(s). The method used for deriving the TRTEFFR2, including a description of which 213 analysis datasets and associated variables are used to derive the TRTEFFR2, should be 214 described in the define file provided with the clinsite.xpt (see discussion below for examples 215 of summary statistics according to different types of efficacy endpoints). 216 • Endpoint (ENDPOINT) — A plain-text label that describes the primary endpoint as 217 described in the data definition file data dictionary included with each application. 218 • Treatment Arm (ARM) — A plain-text label for the treatment arm that is used in the Clinical 219 Study Report. 220 In addition, for studies whose primary endpoint is a time-to-event endpoint, it is critical to 221 include the following data element: 222 • Censored Observations (CENSOR1 and CENSOR2) — The number of censored 223 observations for the given site and by treatment arm for the SAFPOP and EFFPOP, 224 respectively. 225 If a study does not contain a time-to-event endpoint, this data element should be recorded as a 226 missing value (if not applicable, leave blank in clinsite.xpt). 227 228 To accommodate the variety of endpoint types that can be used in analyses, it is critical that the 229 following endpoint type definitions be referenced, and summaries be provided when tabulating 230 the site-specific summary statistic by treatment arm (for TRTEFFR1 and TRTEFFR2): 231 • Discrete Endpoints — Endpoints based on efficacy observations that can take on a discrete 232 number of values (e.g., binary, categorical). Summarize discrete endpoints by an event 233 frequency (i.e., number of events), proportion of patients with an event, proportion of 234 patients responding to treatment, or similar method at the site for the given treatment. 235 • Continuous Endpoints — Endpoints based on efficacy observations that can take on an 236 infinite number of values. Summarize continuous endpoints by the mean, median, or other 237 distributional quantile of the observations at the site for the given treatment. 238 • Time-to-Event Endpoints — Endpoints where the time to occurrence of an event is the 239 primary efficacy measurement. Summarize time-to-event endpoints by two data elements: 240 the number of events that occurred (TRTEFFR1 and TRTEFFR2) and the number of 241 censored observations (CENSOR1 and CENSOR2). 242 • Other — If the primary efficacy endpoint cannot be summarized in terms of the previous 243 guidelines, a single value or multiple values with precisely defined variable interpretations 244 should be submitted as part of the dataset. 245 In all cases, the endpoint description provided in the ENDPOINT plain-text label should be 246 expressed clearly to interpret the value provided in the TRTEFFR1 and TRTEFFR2 variables. 247 248
Contains Nonbinding Recommendations 7 When more than one primary efficacy endpoint exists, additional rows should be added to the 249 dataset to report additional ENDPOINT, Primary Endpoint Type (ENDPTYPE), TRTEFFR1, 250 and TRTEFFR2 values by arm for each site. 251 252 It is anticipated that efficacy data for all subjects included in the SAFPOP and EFFPOP variables 253 will be included in TRTEFFR1 and TRTEFFR2 variables reported, respectively. If efficacy data 254 is not available for all subjects reported in the SAFPOP or EFFPOP variables, then efficacy data 255 for these subjects should be reported as specified in the study Data Analysis Plan, and the 256 method used for calculation of efficacy variables should be described in the data define table 257 provided with the clinsite.xpt file. 258 259 The summary-level clinical site dataset should be accompanied by a data definition file. The 260 contents of the define file for a dataset and fictional examples are presented in Appendix 3 and 261 Appendix 4 of this Guide. 262 263 C. Creating the Data File (Template and Structure) 264 265 A sample summary-level clinical site data submission using the variables identified in Appendix 266 3 of this Guide is provided in Appendix 4. 267 268 269 IV. SUBMITTING BIMO CLINICAL DATA IN THE eCTD FORMAT 270 271 Clinical study-level information, subject-level data line listings by clinical site, and the 272 summary-level clinical site dataset submitted with an application, in Electronic Common 273 Document (eCTD) format, should be placed in eCTD Module 5 (M5) — Clinical Study Reports, 274 using the following conventions: 275 A. Study Tagging File 276 277 Construct a BIMO study tagging file (STF) and place it in eCTD Module 5.3.5.4, “Other Study 278 reports and related information.” The study identifier (ID) for this STF is “BIMO.” Files 279 described in section III (e.g., Description of Clinical Study-Level Information, Subject-Level 280 Data Line Listings by Clinical Site, and Summary-Level Clinical Site Dataset) of the draft 281 guidance Standardized Format for Electronic Submission of NDA and BLA Content for the 282 Planning of Bioresearch Monitoring (BIMO) Inspections for CDER Submissions (February 283 2018) are linked to this BIMO STF using file tags as indicated below.8 Leaf titles for these data 284 are named “BIMO [list study ID, followed by brief description of file being submitted].” 285 286 Table 1: STF File Tags 287 Requested Item STF File Tag Used For Required File Formats III.A.1-2 data-listing-dataset General clinical study- level information .pdf 8 When final, this guidance will represent the FDA’s current thinking on this topic.
Contains Nonbinding Recommendations 8 Requested Item STF File Tag Used For Required File Formats III.A.3 Protocol-or-amendment Protocol and Protocol Amendments, by study .pdf III.A.3 annotated-crf Sample annotated case report form, by study .pdf III.B data-listing-dataset Data listings, by study (Line listings, by site) .pdf III.C data-listing-dataset Site-level dataset, across studies .xpt III.C data-listing-data- definition Define file .xml Optional data-listing-dataset BIMO Data Reviewer’s Guide .pdf 288 B. eCTD Folder Structure for Clinical Study-Level Information and Subject- 289 Level Line Listings by Clinical Site 290 291 Clinical study-level information and subject-level line listings by clinical site are submitted for 292 each major (i.e., pivotal) study used to support safety and efficacy in the application. 293 294 Within the eCTD folder structure, place clinical study-level information and subject-level line 295 listings by clinical site in the M5 folder as follows: 296 297 Figure 2: Place Clinical Study-Level Information and Subject-Level Line Listings by 298 Clinical Site in the M5 Folder 299 300 301 302 C. eCTD Folder Structure for Summary-Level Clinical Site Dataset 303 304 For the site-level dataset, use the filename “clinsite.xpt.” A single file containing data from all 305 major (i.e., pivotal) studies9 used to support safety and efficacy in the application should be 306 provided. 307 9 For questions regarding whether a study is considered major (i.e., pivotal), applicants should consult the relevant Office of New Drugs review division during Type C Integrated Summary of Safety or pre NDA/BLA meetings.
Contains Nonbinding Recommendations 9 308 Within the eCTD folder structure, place the site-level dataset define file and BIMO Data 309 Reviewer’s Guide, if it is being submitted, in the M5 folder as follows: 310 311 Figure 2: Place the Site-Level Dataset Define File and BIMO Data Reviewer’s Guide in the 312 M5 Folder 313 314 315 316 D. File Format 317 318 The Clinical Study-Level Information and Subject-Level Data Line Listings by Clinical Site 319 should be submitted in PDF (*.pdf). When submitting a BIMO Data Reviewer’s Guide, it should 320 also be submitted in PDF (*.pdf). The summary-level clinical site data should be submitted in 321 SAS transport file format (*.xpt). The define file for the summary-level clinical site data should 322 be submitted in Extensible Markup Language (define.xml) format. For more information, see 323 the Study Data Technical Conformance Guide.10 324 E. Leaf Titles 325 326 Leaf titles for study-level information and study-level, subject-level data line listings by clinical 327 site are named “BIMO [list study ID, followed by brief description of file being submitted].” For 328 the leaf representing the clinsite.xpt dataset, please clearly identify it with the leaf title “BIMO 329 summary-level clinical site data.” 330 331 F. Submission 332 333 See the technical specifications in Transmitting Electronic Submissions Using eCTD 334 Specifications for details on electronic transmission or physical media submissions.11 335 336 The following are helpful references for eCTD submission: 337 10 Available at https://www.fda.gov/industry/fda-resources-data-standards/study-data-standards-resources. 11 Available at http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/DevelopmentApprovalProcess/FormsSubmissionRequirements/ElectronicSub missions/UCM163567.pdf.
Contains Nonbinding Recommendations 10 • ICH eCTD STF Specification V 2.6.1, The eCTD Backbone File Specification for Study 338 Tagging Files (June 2008) (available at https://www.fda.gov/media/159383/download). 339 • FDA guidance for industry Providing Regulatory Submissions in Electronic Format – 340 Certain Human Pharmaceutical Product Applications and Related Submissions Using the 341 eCTD Specifications (February 2020) (available at https://www.fda.gov/regulatory- 342 information/search-fda-guidance-documents). 343 • FDA eCTD web page 344 (http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DevelopmentApprovalProcess/FormsSubmissionRequirements/E 345 lectronicSubmissions/ucm153574.htm ). 346 • For general help with eCTD submissions, submit your questions to the following email 347 address: ESUB@fda.hhs.gov. 348 349 350
Contains Nonbinding Recommendations 11 APPENDIX 1: CLINICAL STUDY-LEVEL INFORMATION 351 352 Format for comprehensive and readily located list of all clinical sites that participated in each 353 clinical study. A separate table should be provided for each clinical study. 354 Table A: Format for Clinical Site Lists 355 Protocol Number: Protocol Title Site Identifier Investigator Name (Prior Clinical Investigator(s)) Site Address at Time of Clinical Study (Updated Site Address when exists and available) Site Contact Information at Time of Clinical Study (Updated Contact Information when exists and available) SITEID LASTNAME, FRSTNAME, MINITIAL FACILITY NAME STREET CITY, STATE, POSTAL COUNTRY PHONE FAX EMAIL 0001* Doe, John M. Doe University Department of Medicine 1 Main St., Suite 100 Silver Spring, MD 20850 USA Phone: 1-555-555-5555 Fax: 1-555-555-5555 Email: john.doe@mail.com 0002 Doe, Jean (Smith, John) Doe University Department of Medicine 1 Main St., Suite 100 Silver Spring, MD 20850 USA Phone: 1-555-555-5555 Fax: 1-555-555-5555 Email: john.smith@mail.com (Phone: 1-555-555-5554 Email: jean.doe@mail.com ) 003 Dietric-Fischer, Inge Hartmannstrasse 7 5300 Bonn 1 Germany Phone:49-555-555-5555 Fax: 49-555-555-5555 Email: Dietric.Fischer@web.de * Site terminated, or clinical investigator changed, at request of sponsor before study completion. 356 357
Contains Nonbinding Recommendations 12 APPENDIX 2: FORMATTING SUBJECT-LEVEL DATA LINE LISTINGS BY 358 CLINICAL SITE 359 360 By Site, by Listing Option A: 361 362 Figure A: By Site, by Listing Option A 363 364 365 366 By Site, by Subject Profile Option B: 367 368 Figure B: By Site, by Subject Profile Option B 369 370 371 Protocol Number Next Site Number Next Site Number Site Number Subject Number Next Subject Number Next Subject Number + + - Subject Profile That Containing All Elements of Requested Line Listings for this Subject - + + Protocol Number Next Site Number Next Site Number Site Number Listing “1” Listing “2” Listing “3” Listing “4” Etc. + + - Etc. Etc.
Contains Nonbinding Recommendations 13 Example of By Site, by Listing Option A: 372 373 Figure C: Example of By Site, by Listing Option A 374 375 376 Example of By Site, by Listing Option B: 377 378 Figure D: Example of By Site, by Listing Option B 379 380 Protocol #1234 Site #0002 Site #0003 Site #0001 Subject Number #0001-001 Subject Number #0001-101 Subject Number #0001-064 + + - Subject Profile Containing All Elements of Requested Line Listings for this Subject - + + Protocol #1234 Site #0002 Site #0003 Site #0001 Consented Subjects Treatment Assignment Discontinuations Study Population Etc. + + - Etc. Etc.
Contains Nonbinding Recommendations 14 APPENDIX 3: CLINICAL SITE DATA ELEMENTS SUMMARY LISTING Table B: Clinical Site Data Elements Summary Listing Variable Index Variable Name Variable Label Type Controlled Terms or Format Notes or Description Sample Value 1 STUDYID Study Identifier Char String Study or trial identification number. ABC-123 2 TITLE Study Title Char String Title of the study as listed in the clinical study report (limit 200 characters). If the title exceeds 200 characters, provide shortened title and define (e.g., use the abbreviated title from clinicaltrial.gov). Double blind, randomized, placebo- controlled clinical study on the influence of drug X on indication Y 3 SPONCNT Sponsor Count Num Integer Total count of sponsors throughout the study. If there was a change in the sponsor while the study was ongoing, with sponsors as defined in § 312.3 (21 CFR 312.3), enter an integer indicating the total count of sponsors. If there was no change in the sponsor while the study was ongoing, enter “1.” 1 4 SPONSOR Sponsor Name Char String Full name of the sponsor organization conducting the study at the time of study completion, as sponsor is defined in § 312.3. If the sponsor name exceeds 200 characters, provide short-form sponsor name and define. DrugCo, Inc. 5 IND IND Number Num 6 digit identifier IND number. If study not performed under IND, leave blank. 010010 6 UNDERIND Under IND Char String Value should equal “Y” if study at the site was conducted under an IND (i.e., a Form FDA 1572 was signed by the investigator) and “N” if study was not conducted under an IND at the site (i.e., a Form FDA 1572 was not signed by the investigator). Y 7 NDA NDA Number Num 6 digit identifier FDA NDA number, if available/applicable. If not applicable, leave blank. 021212 8 BLA BLA Number Num 6 digit identifier FDA identification number for BLA, if available/applicable. If not applicable, leave blank. 123456 9 SUPPNUM Supplement Number Num Integer Serial number for supplemental application, if applicable. If no information is available, leave blank. 4 10 SITEID Study Site Identifier Char String Investigator site identifier assigned by the sponsor. 50 11 ARM Description of Planned Treatment Arm Char String Plain-text label for the name given to an arm or treatment group as referenced in the clinical study report (limit 200 characters). When no arm or treatment group is available due to only screen failure subjects at site, use label “Screen Failure.” Active name and dose (e.g., “Active 25mg”), Comparator product name (e.g., “Drug x”), Placebo, Screen Failure
Contains Nonbinding Recommendations 15 Variable Index Variable Name Variable Label Type Controlled Terms or Format Notes or Description Sample Value 12 COHORT Description of Planned Cohort Char String For cohort studies, the plain-text label given to a cohort as referenced in the clinical study report (limit 200 characters). When not a cohort study, leave blank. A 13 SAFPOP Number of Subjects in Safety Population Num Integer Total number of subjects in safety population at a given site by treatment arm. When a subject has transferred from one site to another, the applicant should handle reporting of such subjects consistently across sites and include in the define file the reporting convention used. The applicant may opt to further explain the reasons subjects transferred between sites in the BIMO Data Reviewer’s Guide, if a guide will be provided. 20 14 EFFPOP Number of Subjects in Efficacy Population Num Integer Total number of subjects in primary efficacy population as reported in the Clinical Study Report at a given site by treatment arm. Further describe the population reported as EFFPOP (e.g.,. Per Protocol, Full Analysis Set, Intent to Treat, modified Intent to Treat) in the clinsite define.html. When a subject has transferred from one site to another, the applicant should handle reporting of such subjects consistently across sites and include in the define file the reporting convention used. The applicant may opt to further explain the reasons subjects transferred between sites in the BIMO Data Reviewer’s Guide, if a guide will be provided. 18 15 SCREEN Number of Subjects Screened Num Integer Total number of subjects screened (and consented) at a given site (overall number per site as subjects have not yet been assigned to treatment arm). When a subject has transferred from one site to another, the applicant should handle reporting of such subjects consistently across sites and include the reporting convention used in the define file or the BIMO Data Reviewer’s Guide (if provided). The applicant may opt to further explain the reasons subjects transferred between sites in the BIMO Data Reviewer’s Guide, if provided. 100 16 DISCSTUD Number Subjects Discont. Study Num Integer Number of subjects in the safety population who discontinued from the study by treatment arm at a given site. 5 17 DISCTRT Number Subjects Discont. Study Treatment Num Integer Number of subjects in the safety population who discontinued from the study treatment by treatment arm at a given site. 10 18 ENDPOINT Primary Endpoint Char String Plain-text label used to describe the primary endpoint as described in the define file included with each application (limit 200 characters). Average increase in blood pressure
Contains Nonbinding Recommendations 16 Variable Index Variable Name Variable Label Type Controlled Terms or Format Notes or Description Sample Value 19 ENDPTYPE Primary Endpoint Type Char String Variable type of the primary endpoint (i.e., “continuous,” “discrete,” “time to event,” or “other”). Continuous 20 TRTEFFR1 Treatment Efficacy Result for SAFPOP Num Floating Point Summary statistic for each primary efficacy endpoint by treatment arm at a given site for subjects in SAFPOP. 1.00 21 TRTEFFR2 Treatment Efficacy Result for EFFPOP Num Floating Point Summary statistic for each primary efficacy endpoint by treatment arm at a given site for subjects in EFFPOP. 0.98 22 CENSOR1 Censored Observations in SAFPOP Num Integer Total number of censored observations in SAFPOP at a given site by treatment arm for primary endpoint (e.g., applicable to time-to-event). If not applicable, leave blank. 5 23 CENSOR2 Censored Observations in EFFPOP Num Integer Total number of censored observations in EFFPOP at a given site by treatment arm for primary endpoint (e.g., applicable to time-to-event). If not applicable, leave blank. 3 24 NSAE Number of Non- Serious Adverse Events Num Integer Total number of nonserious adverse events at a given site by treatment arm for subjects in the SAFPOP. This value should include multiple events per subject and all event types (i.e., not limited to only those that are deemed related to study drug or that are treatment emergent events). When events with the same preferred term have occurred on different dates for a subject, each event should be counted separately in event count. 10 25 SAE Number of Serious Adverse Events Num Integer Total number of serious adverse events, excluding deaths, at a given site by treatment arm for subjects in the SAFPOP. This value should include multiple events per subject. When events with the same preferred term have occurred on different dates for a subject, each event should be counted separately in event count. 5 26 DEATH Number of Deaths Num Integer Total number of deaths at a given site by treatment arm for subjects in the SAFPOP. 1 27 IMPDEV Number of Important Protocol Deviations Num Integer Total number of important protocol deviations at a given site by treatment arm for subjects in the SAFPOP. A protocol deviation is any change, divergence, or departure from the study design or procedures defined in the protocol or associated investigational plans that is not implemented or intended as a systematic change. This value should include multiple deviations per subject and all major deviation types. Important deviations are those deviations that might significantly affect the completeness, accuracy, and/or reliability of the study data or that might significantly affect a subject's rights, safety, or well-being. 2
Contains Nonbinding Recommendations 17 Variable Index Variable Name Variable Label Type Controlled Terms or Format Notes or Description Sample Value 28 NOIMPDEV Number of Non- Important Protocol Deviations Num Integer Total number of protocol deviations, excluding important protocol deviations, at a given site by treatment arm for subjects in the SAFPOP. A protocol deviation is any change, divergence, or departure from the study design or procedures defined in the protocol or associated investigational plans that is not implemented or intended as a systematic change. 98 29 FINLDISC Financial Disclosure Amount Char String Total financial disclosure amount (US$) by site calculated as the sum of disclosures for the clinical investigator and all sub-investigators, to include all required parities under the applicable regulations (21 CFR 54, 312, 314, 320, 330, 601, 807, 812, 814, and 860). Enter “>=$25,000,” “< $25,000,” “unknown” if a proper value is applicable but is not known (i.e., unable to obtain information from investigator at site), or “masked” if information on this item is available but it has not been provided by the sender due to security, privacy, or other reasons. >= $25,000 30 LASTNAME Investigator Last Name Char String Last name of the clinical investigator as it appears on the Form FDA 1572 or the signed investigator agreement. At sites where the clinical investigator has changed during the course of the study, the most recent clinical investigator should be listed. Doe 31 FRSTNAME Investigator First Name Char String First name of the clinical investigator as it appears on the Form FDA 1572 or the signed investigator agreement. John 32 MINITIAL Investigator Middle Initial Char String Middle initial of the clinical investigator, if any, as it appears on the Form FDA 1572 or the signed investigator agreement. M 33 PHONE Investigator Phone Number Char String Phone number of the clinical investigator. Include country code for non-U.S. numbers. 44-555-555-5555 34 FAX Investigator Fax Number Char String Fax number of the clinical investigator. Include country code for non-U.S. numbers. If not available, leave blank. 44-555-555-5555 35 EMAIL Investigator Email Address Char String Email address of the clinical investigator. John.doe@mail.com 36 COUNTRY Country Char Geopolitical Entities, Names and Codes (GENC) GENC code for the country in which the site is located. USA
Contains Nonbinding Recommendations 18 Variable Index Variable Name Variable Label Type Controlled Terms or Format Notes or Description Sample Value 37 STATE State Char GENC GENC subdivision unabbreviated preferred name in which the site is located. If not applicable, enter “NA.” Maryland 38 CITY City Char String Unabbreviated city or village in which the site is located. Silver Spring 39 POSTAL Postal Code Char String Postal code in which the site is located. If not applicable, enter “NA.” 20850 40 STREET Street Address Char String Street address and office number at which the site is located (limit 200 characters). 2005 John Fitzgerald Kennedy Boulevard Northwest, International Technology Center, Department of Medicine and Pharmacokinetics, National Institute of Clinical Research Twin Towers Building, 41 STREET1 Street Address Continued Char String Street address and office number at which the site is located. Use this field when the STREET variable does not permit sufficient space to fully describe street address and office number at which the site is located. The Executive Wing, Suite # 209
Contains Nonbinding Recommendations 19 APPENDIX 4: EXAMPLES The following is a fictional example of a dataset for a placebo-controlled trial. Four international sites enrolled a total of 205 subjects who were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to active or placebo. In the first example there is a single primary endpoint (percent of responders). In the second example there are co-primary endpoints (percent of responders and change from baseline). Note that since there were two treatment arms, in the first example, each site contains two rows and there are a total of eight rows for the entire dataset. In the second example, each site contains a total of 4 rows, and there are a total of 16 rows for the entire dataset. Table C: Example for Clinical Site Data Elements Summary Listing with One Endpoint STUDYID TITLE SPONCNT SPONSOR IND UNDER- IND NDA BLA SUPP- NUM SITEID ARM COHORT SAFPOP EFFPOP SCREEN DISCSTUD DISCTRT ABC-123 Double blind… 1 DrugCo, Inc. 000001 Y 200001 ∙ ∙ 001 Active - 26 54 61 3 2 ABC-123 Double blind… 1 DrugCo, Inc. 000001 Y 200001 ∙ ∙ 001 Placebo - 25 54 61 4 1 ABC-123 Double blind… 1 DrugCo, Inc. 000001 Y 200001 ∙ ∙ 002 Active - 23 44 54 2 1 ABC-123 Double blind… 1 DrugCo, Inc. 000001 Y 200001 ∙ ∙ 002 Placebo - 25 43 54 4 3 ABC-123 Double blind… 1 DrugCo, Inc. 000001 Y 200001 ∙ ∙ 003 Active - 27 55 62 3 0 ABC-123 Double blind… 1 DrugCo, Inc. 000001 Y 200001 ∙ ∙ 003 Placebo - 26 56 62 5 3 ABC-123 Double blind… 1 DrugCo, Inc. 000001 Y 200001 ∙ ∙ 004 Active - 26 49 60 2 2 ABC-123 Double blind… 1 DrugCo, Inc. 000001 Y 200001 ∙ ∙ 004 Placebo - 27 50 60 1 0 ENDPOINT ENDPTYPE TRTEFFR1 TRTEFFR2 CENSOR1 CENSOR2 NSAE SAE DEATH IMPDEV NOIMPDEV FINLDISC LASTNAME FRSTNAME Percent Responders Binary 0.48 0.64 ∙ - 0 2 0 1 4 < $25,000 Doe John Percent Responders Binary 0.14 0.19 ∙ - 2 2 0 1 6 < $25,000 Doe John Percent Responders Binary 0.48 0.42 ∙ - 3 2 1 0 9 >= $25,000 Washington George Percent Responders Binary 0.14 0.20 ∙ - 0 2 0 3 11 >= $25,000 Washington George Percent Responders Binary 0.54 0.48 ∙ - 2 2 0 1 4 >= $25,000 Jefferson Thomas Percent Responders Binary 0.19 0.32 ∙ - 3 6 0 0 7 >= $25,000 Jefferson Thomas Percent Responders Binary 0.46 0.45 ∙ - 4 1 0 0 8 unknown Lincoln Abraham Percent Responders Binary 0.12 0.16 ∙ - 1 2 0 1 13 unknown Lincoln Abraham MINITIAL PHONE FAX EMAIL COUNTRY STATE CITY POSTAL STREET STREET1 M 555-123-4567 555-123-4560 John@mail.com RUS Moskovskaya Oblast’ Moscow 103009 Kremlin Road 1 M 555-123-4567 555-123-4560 John@mail.com RUS Moskovskaya Oblast’ Moscow 103009 Kremlin Road 1 020-3456-7891 020-3456-7890 george@mail.com GBR Westminster London SW1A 2 10 Downing St
Contains Nonbinding Recommendations 20 020-3456-7891 020-3456-7890 george@mail.com GBR Westminster London SW1A 2 10 Downing St 01-89-12-34-56 01-89-12-34-51 tom@mail.com FRA Paris Paris 75002 1, Rue Road 01-89-12-34-56 01-89-12-34-51 tom@mail.com FRA Paris Paris 75002 1, Rue Road 555-987-6543 555-987-6540 abe@mail.com USA Maryland Rockville 20852 10903 New Hampshire Avenue, Office of Medical Products and Tobacco, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research Building 4, Room 1375 555-987-6543 555-987-6540 abe@mail.com USA Maryland Rockville 20852 10903 New Hampshire Avenue, Office of Medical Products and Tobacco, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research Building 4, Room 1375 Table D: Example for Clinical Site Data Elements Summary Listing with Multiple Primary Endpoints STUDYID TITLE SPONCNT SPONSOR IND UNDER- IND NDA BLA SUPP- NUM SITEID ARM COHORT SAFPOP EFFPOP SCREEN DISCSTUD DISCTRT ABC-123 Double blind… 1 DrugCo, Inc. 000001 Y 200001 ∙ ∙ 001 Active A 26 22 61 3 2 ABC-123 Double blind… 1 DrugCo, Inc. 000001 Y 200001 ∙ ∙ 001 Active B 26 22 61 3 2 ABC-123 Double blind… 1 DrugCo, Inc. 000001 Y 200001 ∙ ∙ 001 Placebo A 25 23 61 4 1 ABC-123 Double blind… 1 DrugCo, Inc. 000001 Y 200001 ∙ ∙ 001 Placebo B 25 23 61 4 1 ABC-123 Double blind… 1 DrugCo, Inc. 000001 Y 200001 ∙ ∙ 002 Active A 23 19 54 2 1 ABC-123 Double blind… 1 DrugCo, Inc. 000001 Y 200001 ∙ ∙ 002 Active B 23 19 54 2 1 ABC-123 Double blind… 1 DrugCo, Inc. 000001 Y 200001 ∙ ∙ 002 Placebo A 25 23 54 4 3 ABC-123 Double blind… 1 DrugCo, Inc. 000001 Y 200001 ∙ ∙ 002 Placebo B 25 23 54 4 3 ABC-123 Double blind… 1 DrugCo, Inc. 000001 Y 200001 ∙ ∙ 003 Active A 27 26 62 3 0 ABC-123 Double blind… 1 DrugCo, Inc. 000001 Y 200001 ∙ ∙ 003 Active B 27 26 62 3 0 ABC-123 Double blind… 1 DrugCo, Inc. 000001 Y 200001 ∙ ∙ 003 Placebo A 26 23 62 5 3 ABC-123 Double blind… 1 DrugCo, Inc. 000001 Y 200001 ∙ ∙ 003 Placebo B 26 23 62 5 3 ABC-123 Double blind… 1 DrugCo, Inc. 000001 Y 200001 ∙ ∙ 004 Active A 26 19 60 2 2 ABC-123 Double blind… 1 DrugCo, Inc. 000001 Y 200001 ∙ ∙ 004 Active B 26 19 60 2 2 ABC-123 Double blind… 1 DrugCo, Inc. 000001 Y 200001 ∙ ∙ 004 Placebo A 27 20 60 1 0 ABC-123 Double blind… 1 DrugCo, Inc. 000001 Y 200001 ∙ ∙ 004 Placebo B 27 20 60 1 0 ENDPOINT ENDPTYPE TRTEFFR1 TRTEFFR2 CENSOR1 CENSOR2 NSAE SAE DEATH IMPDEV NOIMPDEV FINLDISC LASTNAME FRSTNAME Percent Responders Binary 0.48 0.58 ∙ ∙ 0 2 0 1 5 < $25,000 Doe John Change from Baseline Continuous 0.74 0.76 ∙ ∙ 0 2 0 1 8 < $25,000 Doe John Percent Responders Binary 0.14 0.12 ∙ ∙ 2 2 0 1 5 < $25,000 Doe John Change from Baseline Continuous 0.14 0.16 ∙ ∙ 2 2 0 1 8 < $25,000 Doe John Percent Responders Binary 0.48 0.44 ∙ ∙ 3 2 1 0 11 >= $25,0000 Washington George
Contains Nonbinding Recommendations 21 ENDPOINT ENDPTYPE TRTEFFR1 TRTEFFR2 CENSOR1 CENSOR2 NSAE SAE DEATH IMPDEV NOIMPDEV FINLDISC LASTNAME FRSTNAME Change from Baseline Continuous 0.67 0.63 ∙ ∙ 3 2 1 0 13 >= $25,0000 Washington George Percent Responders Binary 0.14 0.15 ∙ ∙ 0 2 0 3 11 >= $25,0000 Washington George Change from Baseline Continuous 0.14 0.16 ∙ ∙ 0 2 0 3 13 >= $25,0000 Washington George Percent Responders Binary 0.54 0.50 ∙ ∙ 2 2 0 1 9 >= $25,0000 Jefferson Thomas Change from Baseline Continuous 0.65 0.61 ∙ ∙ 2 2 0 1 5 >= $25,0000 Jefferson Thomas Percent Responders Binary 0.19 0.22 ∙ ∙ 3 6 0 0 9 >= $25,0000 Jefferson Thomas Change from Baseline Continuous 0.19 0.26 ∙ ∙ 3 6 0 0 5 >= $25,0000 Jefferson Thomas Percent Responders Binary 0.46 0.51 ∙ ∙ 4 1 0 0 0 unknown Lincoln Abraham Change from Baseline Continuous 0.71 0.81 ∙ ∙ 4 1 0 0 3 unknown Lincoln Abraham Percent Responders Binary 0.12 0.17 ∙ ∙ 1 2 0 0 0 unknown Lincoln Abraham Change from Baseline Continuous 0.15 0.19 ∙ ∙ 1 2 0 1 3 unknown Lincoln Abraham MINITIAL PHONE FAX EMAIL COUNTRY STATE CITY POSTAL STREET STREET1 M 555-123-4567 555-123-4560 John@mail.com RUS Moskovskaya Oblast’ Moscow 103009 Kremlin Road 1 M 555-123-4567 555-123-4560 John@mail.com RUS Moskovskaya Oblast’ Moscow 103009 Kremlin Road 1 M 555-123-4567 555-123-4560 John@mail.com RUS Moskovskaya Oblast’ Moscow 103009 Kremlin Road 1 M 555-123-4567 555-123-4560 John@mail.com RUS Moskovskaya Oblast’ Moscow 103009 Kremlin Road 1 ∙ 020-3456-7891 020-3456-7890 george@mail.com GBR Westminster London SW1A 2 10 Downing St Suite 2058 ∙ 020-3456-7891 020-3456-7890 george@mail.com GBR Westminster London SW1A 2 10 Downing St Suite 2058 ∙ 020-3456-7891 020-3456-7890 george@mail.com GBR Westminster London SW1A 2 10 Downing St Suite 2058 ∙ 020-3456-7891 020-3456-7890 george@mail.com GBR Westminster London SW1A 2 10 Downing St Suite 2058 ∙ 01-89-12-34-56 01-89-12-34-51 tom@mail.com FRA Paris Paris 75002 1, Rue Road ∙ 01-89-12-34-56 01-89-12-34-51 tom@mail.com FRA Paris Paris 75002 1, Rue Road ∙ 01-89-12-34-56 01-89-12-34-51 tom@mail.com FRA Paris Paris 75002 1, Rue Road ∙ 01-89-12-34-56 01-89-12-34-51 tom@mail.com FRA Paris Paris 75002 1, Rue Road ∙ 555-987-6543 555-987-6540 abe@mail.com USA Maryland Rockville 20852 2005 John Fitzgerald Kennedy Boulevard Northwest, International Technology Center, Department of Medicine and Pharmacokinetics, National Institute of Clinical Research Twin Towers Building, The Executive Wing, Suite # 209 ∙ 555-987-6543 555-987-6540 abe@mail.com USA Maryland Rockville 20852 2005 John Fitzgerald Kennedy Boulevard Northwest, International Technology Center, Department of Medicine and Pharmacokinetics, National Institute of Clinical Research Twin Towers Building, The Executive Wing, Suite # 209 ∙ 555-987-6543 555-987-6540 abe@mail.com USA Maryland Rockville 20852 2005 John Fitzgerald Kennedy Boulevard Northwest, International Technology Center, Department of Medicine and Pharmacokinetics, National Institute of Clinical Research Twin Towers Building, The Executive Wing, Suite # 209 ∙ 555-987-6543 555-987-6540 abe@mail.com USA Maryland Rockville 20852 2005 John Fitzgerald Kennedy Boulevard Northwest, The Executive
Contains Nonbinding Recommendations 22 MINITIAL PHONE FAX EMAIL COUNTRY STATE CITY POSTAL STREET STREET1 International Technology Center, Department of Medicine and Pharmacokinetics, National Institute of Clinical Research Twin Towers Building, Wing, Suite # 209
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.