CPG Sec 615.115 Extralabel Use of Medicated Feeds for Minor Species

us-fda-guidance-607e52046ce9fdc4761222a3375cee90CPG Sec 615.115 Extralabel Use of Medicated Feeds for Minor SpeciesGuidance

Administrative guidance, not enacted legislation. This captured publisher edition preserves the listed document and attachments; later developments are not independently consolidated.

Issued by:
Guidance Issuing Office
Center for Veterinary Medicine

This revised Compliance Policy Guide (CPG) is an update to the Compliance Policy Guide published in April 2001. The revised CPG represents the Agency’s current thinking on extralabel use of new animal drugs approved for use in or on animal feed (medicated feeds) (as defined in 21 CFR Sec. 558.3(b)(8)) for minor species (as defined in 21 CFR 516.3(b). Minor species are defined by exclusion as animals other than cattle, horses, swine, chickens, turkeys, dogs and cats. The CPG is intended to provide guidance to the field concerning the Agency’s exercise of enforcement discretion with regard to the extralabel use of over-the-counter (OTC) and veterinary feed directive (VFD) medicated feeds in minor species. It does not confer any rights for or on any person and does not operate to bind FDA or the public.


Submit Comments

Submit comments on this guidance document electronically via docket ID: FDA-2013-S-0610 - Specific Electronic Submissions Intended For FDA's Dockets Management Staff (i.e., Citizen Petitions, Draft Proposed Guidance Documents, Variances, and other administrative record submissions)

If unable to submit comments online, please mail written comments to:

Dockets Management
Food and Drug Administration
5630 Fishers Lane, Rm 1061
Rockville, MD 20852

All comments should be identified with the title of the guidance.

Questions?

Contact Point
CVM
Center for Veterinary Medicine
Food and Drug Administration
5001 Campus Drive
College Park, MD 20740
1
Contains Nonbinding Recommendations
Sec. 615.115 Extralabel Use of
Medicated Feeds for Minor Species
Compliance Policy Guide
Guidance for FDA Staff
Additional copies are available from:
Policy and Regulations Staff (HFV-6)
Center for Veterinary Medicine
Food and Drug Administration
7500 Standish Place
Rockville, MD 20855
https://www.fda.gov/inspections-compliance-enforcement-and-criminal-investigations/manual-
compliance-policy-guides/chapter-6-veterinary-medicine
Submit comments on this compliance policy guide (CPG) at any time. Submit electronic
comments to https://www.regulations.gov/. Submit written comments to the Division of Dockets
Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061,
Rockville, MD 20852. All comments should be identified with the Docket No. FDA-1999-D-
1875.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Food and Drug Administration
Office of Regulatory Affairs
and
Center for Veterinary Medicine
December 2016
Contains Nonbinding Recommendations
2
Table of Contents
I. 	Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 3
II. 	Background ....................................................................................................................... 3
III. 	Policy .................................................................................................................................. 4
A. 	Summary Statement ................................................................................................... 4
B. 	General Considerations.............................................................................................. 5
C. 	Veterinarian Considerations ..................................................................................... 6
General ................................................................................................................. 6
Over-The-Counter (OTC) Medicated Feed ...................................................... 7
Veterinary Feed Directive (VFD) Medicated Feed .......................................... 7
D. 	Animal Producer (Client) Considerations................................................................ 8
General ................................................................................................................. 8
Over-The-Counter (OTC) Medicated Feed ...................................................... 9
Veterinary Feed Directive (VFD) Medicated Feed .......................................... 9
E. 	Medicated Feed Manufacturer or Distributor Considerations .............................. 9
IV. 	Regulatory Action Guidance.......................................................................................... 10
V. 	Specimen Charges ........................................................................................................... 11
Domestic Seizure................................................................................................ 11
Contains Nonbinding Recommendations
3
Sec. 615.115 Extralabel Use of Medicated Feeds for Minor Species
Compliance Policy Guide
Guidance for FDA Staff
This guidance represents the current thinking of the Food and Drug Administration
(FDA or Agency) on this topic. It does not establish any rights for any person and is
not binding on FDA or the public. You can use an alternative approach if it satisfies
the requirements of the applicable statutes and regulations. To discuss an alternative
approach, contact the FDA office responsible for this guidance as listed on the title
page.
I. 	Introduction
This revised Compliance Policy Guide (CPG) is an update to the Compliance Policy Guide
published in April 2001. The revised CPG represents the Agency’s current thinking on
extralabel use of new animal drugs approved for use in or on animal feed (medicated feeds) (as
defined in 21 CFR Sec. 558.3(b)(8)) for minor species (as defined in 21 CFR 516.3(b). Minor
species are defined by exclusion as animals other than cattle, horses, swine, chickens, turkeys,
dogs and cats. The CPG is intended to provide guidance to the field concerning the Agency’s
exercise of enforcement discretion with regard to the extralabel use of over-the-counter (OTC)
and veterinary feed directive (VFD) medicated feeds in minor species. It does not confer any
rights for or on any person and does not operate to bind FDA or the public.
In general, FDA's guidance documents do not establish legally enforceable responsibilities.
Instead, they describe the agency's current thinking on various topics and should be viewed only
as recommendations, unless specific regulatory or statutory requirements are cited. The use of
the word should in agency guidances means that something is suggested or recommended, but
not required.
II. 	Background
Prior to 1994, the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the FD&C Act) did not permit the
extralabel use of animal drugs, but the Agency exercised enforcement discretion regarding
extralabel use of animal drugs provided certain criteria were met. These criteria were published
in Compliance Policy Guide 7125.06 and were largely incorporated into the Animal Medicinal
Drug Use Clarification Act of 1994 (AMDUCA). AMDUCA amended the FD&C Act to permit
extralabel uses under certain conditions. The regulations promulgated pursuant to AMDUCA
are codified at 21 CFR part 530.
AMDUCA does not permit extralabel use of medicated feeds. However, there are some minor
species that cannot be practically medicated in any way other than through the use of medicated
feeds. Furthermore, minor species such as fish and game birds have very few drugs approved for
Contains Nonbinding Recommendations
4
their use. In such situations, a veterinarian may determine that extralabel use of medicated feed
is needed to prevent suffering and death in these minor species.
Before the implementation of AMDUCA, the Agency occasionally exercised enforcement
discretion for the extralabel use of medicated feeds in minor species based on a medical need as
long as the medicated feeds were formulated and labeled in accordance with their approved
application. This enforcement discretion continued after AMDUCA because the law does not
permit extralabel use of medicated feeds. The Agency is providing this guidance to our field
personnel on how to address such extralabel use.
On January 1, 2017, a number of drugs used in feeds convert from OTC marketing status to VFD
marketing status as a result of the recommendations provided in Guidance for Industry #213:
New Animal Drugs and New Animal Drug Combination Products Administered in or on
Medicated Feed or Drinking Water of Food-Producing Animals: Recommendations for Drug
Sponsors for Voluntarily Aligning Product Use Conditions with GFI #209. This revised CPG
provides additional guidance to our field personnel on how to address the extralabel use of OTC
and VFD drugs in medicated feed for minor species.
III. Policy
A. Summary Statement
"Extralabel use" means actual use or intended use of a drug in an animal in a manner that is not
in accordance with the approved labeling. This includes, but is not limited to, use in species not
listed in the labeling, use for indications (disease or other conditions) not listed in the labeling,
use at dosage levels, frequencies, or routes of administration other than those stated in the
labeling, and deviation from the labeled withdrawal time based on these different uses. (21 CFR
§ 530.3(a)).
AMDUCA amended section 512 of the FD&C Act to permit extralabel uses of drugs under
certain conditions except in animal feed. 21 U.S.C. 360b(a)(4)(A). The extralabel use of a new
animal drug in animal feed in a manner other than permitted by section 512 of the FD&C Act
and FDA’s implementing regulations results in the new animal drug being unsafe under section
512(a)(1) of the FD&C Act and adulterated under section 501(a)(5) of the FD&C Act. Because
the FD&C Act does not permit extralabel use of drugs in animal feed, such use causes the
medicated feed to be unsafe under section 512(a)(2) of the FD&C Act and adulterated within the
meaning of section 501(a)(6) of the FD&C Act. The Agency may consider regulatory action
when it finds such use or intended use.
However, when there are no approved treatment options available and the health of animals is
threatened, and suffering or death would result from failure to treat the affected animals,
extralabel use of medicated feed may be considered for treatment of minor species. Because of
the need to have therapeutic options available for treatment of minor species, and to help ensure
animal safety and human food safety, FDA is issuing this revised CPG to provide guidance to
FDA staff with respect to factors to consider when determining whether to take enforcement
action against a veterinarian, animal producer, feed manufacturer, and/or feed distributor for the
Contains Nonbinding Recommendations
5
extralabel use of OTC and VFD medicated feeds in minor species. In general, the Agency will
not recommend or initiate enforcement action against the veterinarian, animal producer, feed
mill, or other distributor when extralabel use is consistent with this document.
B. General Considerations
In the course of an inspection or other activity to investigate compliance, field personnel must
look at the following to determine whether to recommend or initiate regulatory action against a
veterinarian, animal producer, feed mill, or other distributor for the extralabel use of OTC and
VFD medicated feeds in minor species. All of the following conditions must be present in order
to consider enforcement discretion:
1. 	The medicated feed is used in an extralabel manner only with the express prior written
recommendation (see section C. Veterinarian Considerations) and oversight of a licensed
veterinarian within the context of a valid veterinarian-client-patient relationship as defined in
21 CFR 530.3(i), which says "A valid veterinarian-client-patient relationship is one in which:
• 	a veterinarian has assumed the responsibility for making medical judgments regarding
the health of (an) animal(s) and the need for medical treatment, and the client (the
owner of the animal or animals or other caretaker) has agreed to follow the
instructions of the veterinarian;
• 	there is sufficient knowledge of the animal(s) by the veterinarian to initiate at least a
general or preliminary diagnosis of the medical condition of the animal(s); and
• 	the practicing veterinarian is readily available for follow up in case of adverse
reactions or failure of the regimen of therapy. Such a relationship can exist only
when the veterinarian has recently seen and is personally acquainted with the keeping
and care of the animal(s) by virtue of examination of the animal(s), and/or by
medically appropriate and timely visits to the premises where the animal(s) are kept."
2. 	The medicated feed is used in an extralabel manner only for treatment of minor species as
defined in the Code of Federal Regulations (21 CFR 516.3(b)). As previously stated,
extralabel use under this revised CPG is limited to:
• 	use in minor species not listed in the labeling,
• 	use for indications (diseases or other conditions) not listed in the labeling, and
• 	extension of the labeled withdrawal time (see section C. Veterinarian
Considerations/General).
3. 	The Type A medicated article is approved for use in or on animal feed and such feed is
manufactured and labeled according to the approved labeling as described in 21 CFR part
558;
Contains Nonbinding Recommendations
6
4. 	Extralabel use of medicated feed in a food-producing minor species is limited to use in a
minor species similar to the species for which the medicated feed is approved. Extralabel use
of medicated feed for:
• 	aquaculture is limited to medicated feeds approved for use in aquatic species;
• 	avian species is limited to medicated feeds approved for use in avian species; and
• 	mammalian species is limited to medicated feeds approved for use in mammalian
species.
5. 	Extralabel use of medicated feed is limited to a farmed or confined minor species. Use for
the treatment of unconfined wildlife is not appropriate and thus is outside the scope of this
CPG;
6. 	Extralabel use is limited to therapeutic treatment when the health of an animal is threatened
and suffering or death may result from failure to treat. It is unacceptable under any
circumstances to use a medicated feed in an extralabel manner for improving rate of weight
gain, feed efficiency, or other production purposes.
7. 	The person, including veterinarians, animal producers, feed mill distributors, or other
distributors, as applicable, has not promoted or advertised the medicated feed for an
extralabel use. Such promotional activity is not appropriate because extralabel use of
medicated feed is not legally permissible under the FD&C Act.
This CPG does not apply to the extralabel use of a new animal drug used in animal feed if the
new animal drug in question is not approved by FDA for use in or on animal feed. Further, this
CPG does not apply to medicated feeds which contain a drug or drug class that is specifically
excluded by FDA from extralabel use. At this time, these specific exclusions include all drugs or
drug classes prohibited for extralabel use in animals (21 CFR 530.41). Please note that all of the
drugs on the prohibited list are dosage form drugs, and none of the drugs or drug classes on the
prohibited list has an approved application for use in medicated feed. FDA intends that all such
drugs or drug classes be excluded from this CPG even if, at some point in the future, any become
approved for use in medicated feed. Examples of such prohibited drugs or drug classes are
fluoroquinolones, glycopeptides, and cephalosporin antimicrobials. FDA will update this CPG if
it becomes necessary to exclude the extralabel use in minor species of additional drugs approved
for use in medicated feed.
C. Veterinarian Considerations
General
In the course of an inspection or other activity to investigate compliance, in order to consider
enforcement discretion in cases where a veterinarian is recommending or authorizing the
extralabel use of an approved new animal drug in or on animal feed for use in a minor species,
field personnel must also determine that, along with meeting all of the applicable conditions
listed above in section B. General Considerations, the veterinarian has done all of the following:
Contains Nonbinding Recommendations
7
1. 	Made a careful diagnosis and evaluation of the therapeutic indication for which the drug is to
be used;
2. 	Made a determination within the context of a valid veterinarian-client-patient relationship
that there is no approved new animal drug that (i) is labeled for such use, and (ii) contains the
same active ingredient in the dosage form and concentration necessary for treatment; or, in
cases where there is an approved new animal drug, the approved drug is clinically ineffective
(see #7) for the use for which the medicated feed is intended;
3. 	Ascertained that there is no therapeutic dosage form that can be practically used under legal
extralabel use;
4. 	Instituted procedures to ensure that the identity of treated animals is carefully maintained;
5. 	Established a withdrawal period that is substantially extended beyond that of the approved
use (supported by appropriate scientific information) prior to marketing of milk, meat, eggs,
or other edible products derived from the treated minor species, if applicable;
6. 	Taken appropriate measures to ensure that assigned timeframes for withdrawal are met and
no unsafe drug residues occur in any food-producing animal subjected to extralabel
treatment; and
7. 	Has reported any adverse reactions to FDA within 10 days of occurrence by visiting FDA’s
webpage entitled “How to Report Animal Drug Side Effects and Product Problems” at:
https://www.fda.gov/animal-veterinary/report-problem/how-report-animal-drug-side-effects-
and-product-problems. The veterinarian also should have reported treatments that were not
clinically effective.
Over-The-Counter (OTC) Medicated Feed
In cases where a veterinarian is recommending the extralabel use of an OTC medicated feed for a
minor species, in order to consider enforcement discretion field personnel must determine that,
along with meeting all of the applicable conditions listed above in sections B. General
Considerations and C. Veterinarian Considerations/General, the veterinarian has done all of the
following:
1. 	Made a written recommendation that includes the medical rationale (e.g., diagnosis, drug
selection, dose and duration, and the required withdrawal period), dated within 6 months
prior to use;
2. 	Provided the client with a copy of the written recommendation; and
3. 	Kept copies of the written recommendation and makes them available to the FDA upon
request.
Veterinary Feed Directive (VFD) Medicated Feed
Contains Nonbinding Recommendations
8
In cases where a veterinarian is authorizing the extralabel use of a VFD medicated feed for a
minor species, in order to consider enforcement discretion field personnel must determine that,
along with meeting all of the applicable conditions listed above in sections B. General
Considerations and C. Veterinarian Considerations/General and satisfying the applicable
requirements in the regulations relating to VFD drugs under 21 CFR 558.6, the veterinarian has
done all of the following:
1. 	Completed a separate written recommendation to the client for the extralabel use that
includes the medical rationale (e.g., diagnosis, drug selection, dose and duration, and the
withdrawal period (see above at section C. Veterinarian Considerations/General), dated
within 6 months prior to use;
a. 	Provided the client with a copy of the written recommendation; and
b. 	Kept copies of the written recommendation for 2 years and makes them available to
the FDA upon request.
2. 	Completed the VFD consistent with the approved labeling for the indication. In the "Special
Instructions" the veterinarian should note:
a. 	"This VFD is being issued in accordance with CPG 615.115";
b. 	The actual species for which the medicated feed is intended (unless that species is
already reflected on the VFD because the VFD drug is approved for use in that minor
species, but is being used for a different indication); and
c. 	The withdrawal time associated with the extralabel use if different than the labeled
withdrawal time as already reflected on the VFD (see section C. Veterinarian
Considerations/General).
D. Animal Producer (Client) Considerations
General
In the course of an inspection or other activity to investigate compliance, in order to consider
enforcement discretion with respect to an animal producer using medicated feed in an extralabel
manner for a minor species, field personnel must determine that, along with meeting all of the
applicable conditions listed above in section B. General Considerations, the animal producer has
done all of the following:
1. 	Kept complete and accurate records of medicated feeds received, including labels, invoices,
and dates fed. These records are kept for at least 2 years from the date of delivery of the
medicated feed;
2. 	Instituted procedures to ensure that the identity of treated animals is carefully maintained;
Contains Nonbinding Recommendations
9
3. 	Taken appropriate measures to ensure that assigned timeframes for withdrawal are met and
no unsafe drug residues occur in edible products derived from an animal receiving extralabel
treatment;
4. 	Used the medicated feed in accordance with Federal, State, and local environmental and
occupational laws and regulations. This is especially important for aquaculture uses;
5. 	Met the requirements of the Federal Clean Water Act as implemented under the National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES), as well as any requirements applicable to
ground-water pollution. The producer should contact the offices responsible for issuing
NPDES permits, and other similar permits, to be certain there are no objections to the use and
release of the drug; and
6. 	Followed user safety provisions as set forth in approved product labeling to protect
individuals who may be exposed to the drug.
Over-The-Counter (OTC) Medicated Feed
In cases where a veterinarian is authorizing the extralabel use of an OTC medicated feed for a
minor species, in order to consider enforcement discretion, field personnel must determine that
the animal producer has kept a copy of the veterinarian’s written recommendation for the
extralabel use of the medicated feed, the copy is being kept by the animal producer for at least 2
years after feeding the medicated feed, and during that time making it available to FDA upon
request.
Veterinary Feed Directive (VFD) Medicated Feed
In cases where a veterinarian is authorizing the extralabel use of a VFD medicated feed for a
minor species, in order to consider enforcement discretion, field personnel must determine that the
animal producer has complied with the applicable VFD regulations in 21 CFR 558.6, including
keeping a copy of the VFD for 2 years and during that time making such records available to
FDA upon request.
E. Medicated Feed Manufacturer or Distributor Considerations
In the course of an inspection or other activity to investigate compliance, in order to consider
enforcement discretion with respect to an individual or firm who manufactures and/or distributes
medicated feed for extralabel use in minor species, field personnel must determine that the
medicated feed manufacturer and/or distributor has done all of the following:
1. 	Formulated the medicated feed as approved1;
1 The non-medicated ingredients (nutrients) may be customized to be appropriate for the diet of the minor species as
long as the customization is not in conflict with the medicated feed approval. The manufacturer/distributor is
Contains Nonbinding Recommendations
10
2. 	Labeled the medicated feed to reflect the approved bluebird label
(https://www.fda.gov/animal-veterinary/medicated-feeds/blue-bird-labels);
3. 	Maintained the manufacturing record (including capturing any nutrient modifications) for 1
year as required by 21 CFR part 225. (Note that any records that would also be required
under 21 CFR part 507 relating to the manufacturing, processing, packing, or holding of
animal food must be kept for at least 2 years); and
4. 	If applicable, met the requirements for the manufacture/distribution of a veterinary feed
directive (VFD) medicated feed in 21 CFR 558.6, including maintaining the VFD for 2
years and during that time making such records available to FDA upon request.
IV. Regulatory Action Guidance
Districts should consult with CVM, Division of Compliance, prior to taking enforcement action
against a veterinarian, animal producer, feed mill distributor, or other distributor for the
extralabel use of OTC and VFD medicated feeds in minor species.
Priority for enforcement action for extralabel use will generally be given to:
1. 	Veterinarians who authorize such use of the medicated feed in a manner that is
inconsistent with sections III. B. General Considerations and C. Veterinarian
Considerations;
2. 	Animal producers who use the medicated feed in a manner that is inconsistent with
sections III. B. General Considerations and D. Animal Producer (Client) Considerations;
and
3. 	Individuals or firms that manufacture or distribute the medicated feed in a manner that is
inconsistent with sections III. B. General Considerations and E. Medicated Feed
Manufacturer or Distributor Considerations.
In cases where the circumstances described in sections III.B. through III.E. of this CPG do not
exist, the following regulatory actions may be taken:
A Warning Letter is ordinarily the first choice of action. The following language should be used
to cite the violation:
The animal drug **** is adulterated within the meaning of Section 501(a)(5) of the
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act [the FD&C Act] as its use or intended use does
not conform to its approved application in accordance with Section 512(a)(1) of the
FD&C Act.
expected to engage with the client (animal producer) and/or nutritionist to formulate a medicated feed with
appropriate nutrient content for the minor species that is consistent with the terms of the approval.
Contains Nonbinding Recommendations
11
The animal feed **** is adulterated within the meaning of Section 501(a)(6) of the
FD&C Act as its use or intended use does not conform to its approved application in
accordance with Section 512(a)(2)(A) of the FD&C Act.
If a veterinarian did not recommend or authorize the use of the medicated feed for extralabel
purposes, the Warning Letter should be issued to the animal producer with a copy sent to the
veterinarian, if applicable. If a veterinarian recommended the use of the medicated feed for
extralabel use other than as described in section III.C., the Warning Letter should be issued to the
veterinarian with a copy sent to the animal producer.
If an individual or firm manufactures and/or distributes medicated feed other than as described in
section III.E., the Warning Letter should be issued to the manufacturer or distributor, with a copy
to the animal producer and veterinarian, if applicable.
The medicated feed manufacturer or distributor also may be considered for enforcement action if
there is sufficient evidence to show that it knew that the medicated feed was intended for
extralabel use in other than a minor species.
If there is a tissue residue violation, the District should establish the responsible individuals. This
would ordinarily be the animal producer and/or veterinarian. However, in rare situations such as
an incorrect formulation or use of a new animal drug that is not approved for use in medicated
feed, the medicated feed manufacturer and/or distributor may be considered responsible for the
violation. The District should follow Compliance Program Guidance Manual 7371.006 and
should cite the tissue residue food adulteration violation under Section 402(a)(2)(C)(ii) of the
FD&C Act.
Should field personnel have any questions about the application of this guide, they may call
CVM's Division of Compliance at (240) 402-7001 or email at CVMcompliance@fda.hhs.gov.
V. 	Specimen Charges
Domestic Seizure
The animal drug **** is adulterated within the meaning of Section 501(a)(5) as its use or
intended use does not conform to its approved application in accordance with Section
512(a)(1) of the FD&C Act.
The animal feed **** is adulterated within the meaning of Section 501(a)(6) as its use or
intended use does not conform to its approved application in accordance with Section
512(a)(2)(A).
*Material between asterisks is new or revised.*
Issued: 04/18/2001
Revised: 11/17/2016

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.