us-fda-guidance-677a115faeece4a6cc25b42e4c83bcd8•Size of Beads in Drug Products Labeled for Sprinkle Rev.1: Guidance for Industry
Size of Beads in Drug Products Labeled for Sprinkle Rev.1: Guidance for Industry
us-fda-guidance-677a115faeece4a6cc25b42e4c83bcd8Size of Beads in Drug Products Labeled for Sprinkle Rev.1: Guidance for IndustryGuidance
Administrative guidance, not enacted legislation. This captured publisher edition preserves the listed document and attachments; later developments are not independently consolidated.
- Docket Number:
- FDA-2011-D-0021
- Issued by:
- Guidance Issuing OfficeCenter for Drug Evaluation and Research
This guidance provides applicants preparing or submitting new drug applications (NDAs), abbreviated new drug applications (ANDAs), and biologics licensing applications (BLAs) the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research’s current thinking on appropriate size ranges for beads in drug products that are labeled to be administered via sprinkling (e.g., capsules or packets containing beads).
Submit Comments
You can submit online or written comments on any guidance at any time (see 21 CFR 10.115(g)(5))
If unable to submit comments online, please mail written comments to:
Dockets Management
Food and Drug Administration
5630 Fishers Lane, Rm 1061
Rockville, MD 20852
All written comments should be identified with this document's docket number: FDA-2011-D-0021.
Guidance for Industry Size of Beads in Drug Products Labeled for Sprinkle U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) May 2012 CMC Rev. 1
Guidance for Industry Size of Beads in Drug Products Labeled for Sprinkle Additional copies are available from: Office of Communications Division of Drug Information, WO51, Room 2201 Center for Drug Evaluation and Research Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Ave. Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002 Phone: 301-796-3400; Fax: 301-847-8714 druginfo@fda.hhs.gov www.fda.gov/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/default.htm U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) May 2012 CMC Rev. 1
Contains Nonbinding Recommendations TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................. 1 II. BACKGROUND……………………………………………………………………………1 III. DISCUSSION…………………………………………………………………………… …. 2 A. Maximum Bead Size for Drug Products Labeled for Sprinkle.................................................. 2 B. Enteral Feeding Tube Administration ......................................................................................... 3 C. Bioavailability/Bioequivalence Recommendations ..................................................................... 3
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 Contains Nonbinding Recommendations 1 Guidance for Industry1 2 Size of Beads in Drug Products Labeled for Sprinkle 3 4 This guidance represents the Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA’s) current thinking on this topic. It 6 does not create or confer any rights for or on any person and does not operate to bind FDA or the public. 7 You can use an alternative approach if the approach satisfies the requirements of the applicable statutes 8 and regulations. If you want to discuss an alternative approach, contact the FDA staff responsible for 9 implementing this guidance. If you cannot identify the appropriate FDA staff, call the appropriate number listed on the title page of this guidance. 11 12 13 14 I. INTRODUCTION 16 This guidance provides applicants preparing or submitting new drug applications (NDAs), 17 abbreviated new drug applications (ANDAs), and biologics licensing applications (BLAs) the 18 Center for Drug Evaluation and Research’s current thinking on appropriate size ranges for beads 2 19 in drug products that are labeled to be administered via sprinkling (e.g., capsules or packets containing beads). 21 22 FDA’s guidance documents, including this guidance, do not establish legally enforceable 23 responsibilities. Instead, guidances describe the Agency’s current thinking on a topic and should 24 be viewed only as recommendations, unless specific regulatory or statutory requirements are cited. The use of the word should in Agency guidances means that something is suggested or 26 recommended, but not required. 27 28 II. BACKGROUND 29 Certain drug products that contain beads within a capsule indicate in the labeling that the capsule 31 can be broken and the internal beads can be sprinkled on soft foods and swallowed without 32 chewing as an alternative administration technique. This is particularly common with drug 33 products designed to have extended- or delayed-release characteristics (i.e., the beads are 34 manufactured to release the drug product at different rates). To make certain that the intended product performance is achieved—whether from a capsule that has been broken or from a packet 36 containing beads—it is important to have reasonable assurance that the patient will be able to 37 swallow the beads (uncrushed) with the food with which the beads are mixed without stimulating 38 the urge to chew. Additional assurances may be needed when the label also includes specific 39 language concerning alternate administration via an enteral feeding tube. 41 1 This guidance has been prepared by the Office of Pharmaceutical Science in the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) at the Food and Drug Administration. 2 For the purposes of this guidance, the term beads will be used to describe the component particles in drug products labeled for sprinkle (i.e., beads, granules, pellets, sprinkles, particles, mini-tablets). 1
Contains Nonbinding Recommendations 42 III. DISCUSSION 43 44 The recommendations in this guidance are based on literature on chewing and swallowing 45 particle size and on Agency experience with NDAs and ANDAs submitted for these dosage 46 forms. This guidance provides the following information related to drug products labeled for 47 sprinkle: (1) appropriate maximum size for the beads, (2) special considerations for sprinkle 48 drug products that include language in labeling concerning alternate administration via an enteral 49 feeding tube, and (3) bioavailability or bioequivalence recommendations. 50 51 A. Maximum Bead Size for Drug Products Labeled for Sprinkle 52 53 To determine an appropriate maximum bead size, the Agency took two actions. First, the 54 55 Agency reviewed studies of human mastication, which demonstrated that food is chewed to a median particle size range from 0.82 to 3.04 mm before swallowing. 3,4 Second, we examined 56 currently approved drug products labeled for sprinkle that contain beads up to 2.4 mm and found 57 no recognized safety risks or loss of efficacy associated with the bead size. 58 59 Based on this information, the Agency recommends a target bead size up to 2.5 mm with no 60 more than 10 percent variation over this size, to a maximum size of 2.8 mm. The recommended 61 bead size allowances consider the variability and differing manufacturing processes of beads 62 (e.g., pellet versus mini-tablet manufacturing). If the proposed bead size is greater than that 63 recommended in this guidance, the applicant should provide justification for the proposed bead 64 size, including studies demonstrating that the bead can be swallowed without chewing using 65 sprinkle administration in the intended population. 66 67 The Agency recognizes the specific importance of a maximum size limit for modified-release 68 products, where unintentional chewing of beads may lead to pharmacokinetic differences, but 69 also believes that maintaining a consistent maximum bead size for all drug products labeled for 70 sprinkle is appropriate. Inadvertently chewing beads labeled for sprinkle may lead to 71 noncompliance with taking medication because of taste, safety issues, and decreased drug 72 product efficacy. The target and maximum bead size recommendations thus apply to all drug 73 products that contain particles that are labeled for sprinkle administration, whether the product 74 has immediate-, delayed-, or extended-release characteristics. Target and maximum bead size, 75 76 including bead size distribution, can be determined through analytical sieving in accordance with USP <786> 5 or other appropriately validated methods. 77 78 The bead size distribution can be provided in the 3.2.P.3.3 (Description of Manufacturing 79 Process and Process Controls) section or 3.2.P.5.1 (Specification) section, and the maximum 80 bead size can be provided in the 3.2.P.1 (Description and Composition of the Drug Product) 81 section or 3.2.P.3.4 (Control of Critical Steps and Intermediates) section of a common technical 82 document (CTD) formatted application. 3 Jalabert-Malbos, M.L., Mishellany-Dutour, A., Woda, A., and Peyron, M.A., 2007, “Particle size distribution in the food bolus after mastication of natural foods,” Food Quality and Preference, 18, 803-812. 4 Peyron, M.A., Mishellany, A., and Woda, A., 2004, “Particle size distribution of food boluses after mastication of six natural foods,” Journal of Dental Research, 83(7), 578-582. 5 See USP <786> Particle Size Distribution Estimation by Analytical Sieving. 2
Contains Nonbinding Recommendations 83 This recommendation applies only to NDAs, ANDAs, and BLAs for products that are not yet 84 approved. Sponsors of currently approved NDAs, ANDAs, or BLAs for products that contain 85 beads that do not meet the recommended limits in this guidance need not modify their product 86 specifications, unless there is reason to believe that an individual product poses a particular risk 87 to public health because of its bead size. 88 89 An ANDA that references a currently approved reference listed drug (RLD) that exceeds the 90 recommended limits in this guidance may propose a target and maximum bead size equal to or 91 less than that used in the currently approved RLD. If the proposed target and/or maximum bead 92 size is greater than that used in the currently approved RLD, the applicant should provide 93 justification for the proposed bead size, as described above. If the ANDA applicant has data 94 regarding the RLD bead size variation, then those data should be provided to support the size(s) 95 of the beads in the ANDA product. This information can be provided in the 3.2.P.2 96 (Pharmaceutical Development) section or 3.2.P.5.6 (Justification of Specification) section of a 97 CTD formatted application. 98 99 B. Enteral Feeding Tube Administration 100 101 A small number of sprinkle drug products include language in the labeling that specifically 102 provides for alternative administration via enteral feeding tubes to accommodate patients who 103 cannot safely swallow or are unable to tolerate oral intake. Successful delivery of sprinkle drug 104 products through an enteral feeding tube requires that all of the beads (uncrushed) be able to 105 safely pass through the feeding tube and not cause tube occlusions. 106 107 Drug products that include this alternate administration method should demonstrate that the 108 entire contents can be adequately administered. For example, in vitro in-use tests of the sprinkle 109 drug product with feeding tubes indicated in the labeling can be used to support the product use 110 with labeled routes of administration. Such a study or studies, as applicable, are recommended 111 for NDAs and ANDAs, as bead size may vary or coating may differ between these products, 112 resulting in varying ability to pass through a feeding tube. If there are questions about the design 113 or analysis of such studies, the sponsors and/or applicants should contact the appropriate review 114 division within the Office of New Drugs or the Office of Generic Drugs. There is no 115 recommendation for these studies if the labeling does not specify enteral feeding tube 116 administration. These studies can be provided in the 3.2.P.2 (Pharmaceutical Development) 117 section or 3.2.P.5.6 (Justification of Specification) section of a CTD formatted application. 118 119 C. Bioavailability/Bioequivalence Recommendations 120 121 The acceptability of bead size and bead size differences from a bioavailability (BA) or 122 bioequivalence (BE) perspective is directly evaluated in BA/BE studies. 123 124 In NDAs, in the case of capsules containing beads, for the labeling to indicate that the beads in 125 the drug product can be sprinkled on soft foods, additional in vivo relative BA studies may be 126 needed. This can be accomplished by administering beads that have been sprinkled on one of the 127 soft foods (e.g., applesauce) that are listed in the labeling (test treatment) and comparing the 128 sprinkled product’s BA results to those of the product administered in the intact form (reference 3
Contains Nonbinding Recommendations 129 treatment). Both products should be administered under fasting conditions.6 In addition, the 130 administration of beads when mixed with soft foods should be evaluated for the ability to take 131 the product without chewing the beads. If there are questions about the design or analysis of 132 such BA studies, the sponsors and/or applicants should contact the appropriate review division 133 within the Office of New Drugs. 134 135 In ANDAs, when the labeling for the RLD for a modified-release drug product indicates that the 136 product may be sprinkled on soft foods, a sprinkle study comparing the test and RLD products 137 should be performed. Both treatments should be sprinkled on one of the soft foods that are listed 138 in the labeling (e.g., applesauce). The BE data should be analyzed using average BE, and the 90- 139 percent confidence interval criteria should be used to evaluate BE. Specific BE requirements for 140 individual drug products can be found in the guidance for industry on Bioequivalence 141 Recommendations for Specific Drug Products.7 142 143 In ANDAs, for immediate-release (IR) drug products labeled for sprinkle, it is generally not 144 necessary to conduct a sprinkle BE study, as the expectation would be that the sprinkles would 145 behave similarly for the test and RLD IR products. 146 147 If there are questions about the design or analysis of specific BE studies, the sponsors and/or 148 applicants should contact the appropriate review division within the Office of Generic Drugs. 149 The Agency may request additional BE studies under special circumstances if deemed 150 appropriate. 6 Information on BA studies of sprinkled drug products also can be found in the guidance for industry, Food-Effect Bioavailability and Fed Bioequivalence Studies, December 2002. CDER updates guidances periodically. To make sure you have the most recent version of a guidance, check the FDA Drugs guidance web page at www.fda.gov/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/default.htm. 7 See www.fda.gov/drugs/guidancecomplianceregulatoryinformation/guidances/ucm075207.htm. 4
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.