Federal Register final rules — 1996-01-17

issue-1996-01-17Federal Register final rules — 1996-01-17Regulation

Published Federal Register documents, not public-inspection drafts. The GPO XML/text rendition is a research aid; the linked complete official PDF retains the printed layout and all graphics. Graphics are retained in that PDF and are not independently reproduced in this text rendition. Publication does not establish that every provision remains legally in force.

FR Doc. 96-439 Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards; Stability and Control of Medium and Heavy Vehicles During Braking
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 11 (Wednesday, January 17, 1996)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 1152]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-439]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

49 CFR Part 571

[Docket No. 92-29; Notice 9]
RIN 2127-AF96

Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards; Stability and Control of 
Medium and Heavy Vehicles During Braking

AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule, notice to extend time period for petitions for 
reconsideration.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document extends the period of time to submit petitions 
for reconsideration of a final rule published on December 13, 1995 that 
responded to petitions for reconsideration of a final rule that amended 
Standard No. 105, Hydraulic Brake Systems, and Standard No. 121, Air 
Brake Systems, to require medium and heavy vehicles be equipped with an 
antilock brake system (ABS).

DATES: Petitions for Reconsideration: Any petitions for reconsideration 
of the December 13, 1995 final rule must be received by NHTSA no later 
than January 29, 1996.

ADDRESSES: Petitions for reconsideration should refer to Docket No. 92-
29, Notice 7 and should be submitted to: Administrator, National 
Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 400 Seventh Street, SW., 
Washington, DC 20590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Marvin L. Shaw, NCC-20, Rulemaking 
Division, Office of Chief Counsel, National Highway Traffic Safety 
Administration, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590 (202) 
366-2992.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On December 13, 1995, NHTSA published a 
final rule responding to petitions for reconsideration of final rules 
addressing the brake performance of medium and heavy vehicles. (60 FR 
63965). The December final rule required petitions for reconsideration 
to be submitted no later than January 12, 1996.
    On December 5, 1995, NHTSA published a final rule that amended 
NHTSA's procedural rules. (60 FR 62221) Among other things, that rule 
provided that the agency will accept petitions for reconsideration of a 
final rule, if they are received not more than 45 days after the 
publication of the final rule. Previously, petitions for 
reconsideration had to be received not more than 30 days following 
publication of a final rule.
    NHTSA inadvertently did not apply this new procedural amendment to 
the December 13, 1995 final rule that addressed heavy vehicle brake 
performance. Given that the new procedural amendments should have 
applied to that notice, the agency is extending the period of time that 
interested parties may submit petitions for reconsideration an 
additional 15 days. Accordingly, any petitions for reconsideration of 
the December 13, 1995 final rule must be received by NHTSA no later 
than January 29, 1996.
Barry Felrice,
Associate Administrator for Safety Performance Standards.
[FR Doc. 96-439 Filed 1-11-96; 2:23 pm]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P

Complete official Federal Register PDF

FR Doc. 96-373 Amendment of Class E Airspace; Britton, SD
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 11 (Wednesday, January 17, 1996)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 1149-1150]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-373]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Airspace Docket No. 95-AGL-14]

Amendment of Class E Airspace; Britton, SD

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This amendment modifies Class E airspace at Britton, SD. A 
nondirectional radio bacon (NBD) or Global Positioning System (GPS) 
standard instrument approach procedure (SIAP) to Runway 13 has been 
revised for the Britton Municipal Airport. The intended effect of this 
action is to provide controlled airspace extending upward from 700 feet 
above ground level (AGL) and 1200 feet AGL for aircraft executing the 
approach.

EFFECTIVE DATE: 0901 UTC, April 25, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Eleanor J. Williams, Air Traffic Division, System Management Branch, 
AGL-530, Federal Aviation Administration, 2300 East Devon Avenue, Des 
Plaines, Illinois 60018, telephone (708) 294-7568.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

History

    On October 30, 1995, the FAA proposed to amend part 71 of the 
Federal Aviation regulations (14 CFR part 71) by modifying the Class E 
airspace area at Britton, SD (60 FR 55226). The proposal was to add 
controlled airspace to accommodate the revised NDB or GPS SIAP.
    Interested parties were invited to participate in this rulemaking 
proceeding by submitting written comments on the proposal to the FAA. 
No comments objecting to the proposal were received. Class E airspace 
designations for areas extending upward from 700 feet or more above the 
surface of the earth, are published in paragraph 6005 of FAA Order 
7400.9C dated August 17, 1995, and effective September 16, 1995, which 
is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Class E airspace 
designation listed in this document will be published subsequently in 
the Order.

The Rule

    This amendment to part 71 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 
CFR part 71) amends Class E airspace at Britton, SD, by providing 
additional controlled airspace for aircraft executing the NBD or GPS 
Runway 13 SIAP at Britton Municipal Airport. Controlled airspace 
extending upward from 700 feet AGL and 1200 feet AGL is needed for 
aircraft executing the approach. The area will be depicted on 
appropriate aeronautical charts thereby enabling pilots to 
circumnavigate the area or otherwise comply with IFR procedures.
    The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an 
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and 
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current. 
Therefore, this regulation: (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory 
action'' under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' 
under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26, 
1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation of a Regulatory Evaluation 
as the anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter 
that will only affect air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is 
certified that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on 
a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the 
Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

Adoption of the Amendment

    In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation 
Administration amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--[AMENDED]

    1. The authority citation for 14 part 71 continues to read as 
follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24 
FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389; 14 CFR 11.69.

[[Page 1150]]

Sec. 71.1  [Amended]

    2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of the Federal 
Aviation Administration Order 7400.9C, Airspace Designations and 
Reporting Points, dated August 17, 1995, and effective September 16, 
1995, is amended as follows:
    Paragraph 6005  Class E airspace areas extending upward from 700 
feet or more above the surface of the earth.
 * * * * *

AGL SD E5 Britton, SD [Revised]

Britton Municipal Airport
    (lat. 45 deg.48'57'' N, long. 97 deg.44'39'' W)
    That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface 
within a 7-mile radius of the Britton Municipal Airport and that 
airspace extending upward from 1,200 feet above the surface bounded 
on the west by long. 98 deg.30'00'' W., on the north by lat. 
46 deg.30'00'' N., on the east by long. 97 deg.00'00'' W., and on 
the south by lat. 44 deg.30'00'' N., excluding the Fargo, ND; 
Watertown, SD; Huron, SD; Aberdeen, SD; 1,200 foot Class E airspace 
areas and all federal airways.
 * * * * *
    Issued in Des Plaines, Illinois on December 29, 1995.
Jeffrey L. Griffith,
Acting Manager, Air Traffic Division.
[FR Doc. 96-373 Filed 1-16-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M

Complete official Federal Register PDF

FR Doc. 96-324 Milk in the Carolina, Tennessee Valley, and Louisville-Lexington- Evansville Marketing Areas; Order Amending the Orders
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 11 (Wednesday, January 17, 1996)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 1147-1149]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-324]

========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents 
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed 
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published 
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.

The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents. 
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each 
week.

========================================================================

Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 11 / Wednesday, January 17, 1996 / 
Rules and Regulations

[[Page 1147]]

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Agricultural Marketing Service

7 CFR Parts 1005, 1011, and 1046

[Docket No. AO-388-A8 et al.; DA-94-12]

Milk in the Carolina, Tennessee Valley, and Louisville-Lexington-
Evansville Marketing Areas; Order Amending the Orders

AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This final rule amends the pooling standards of the Tennessee 
Valley and Carolina orders; modifies the marketing areas of the 
Tennessee Valley and Louisville-Lexington-Evansville orders; changes 
the location adjustment under the Carolina order for plants located in 
the Middle Atlantic marketing area; and changes the base-paying months 
under the Carolina order. The amendments are based upon industry 
proposals considered at a public hearing held on January 4, 1995. Each 
amended order was approved by more than two-thirds of the producers 
voting in the specified marketing area.

EFFECTIVE DATE: February 16, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nicholas Memoli, Marketing Specialist, 
USDA/AMS/Dairy Division, Order Formulation Branch, Room 2971, South 
Building, P.O. Box 96456, Washington, DC 20090-6456, (202) 690-1932.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This administrative action is governed by 
the provisions of Sections 556 and 557 of Title 5 of the United States 
Code and, therefore, is excluded from the requirements of Executive 
Order 12866.
    The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612) requires the 
Agency to examine the impact of a proposed rule on small entities. 
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 605(b), the Administrator of the Agricultural 
Marketing Service has certified that this rule will not have a 
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. 
The amended order will promote more orderly marketing of milk by 
producers and regulated handlers.
    This final rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12778, 
Civil Justice Reform. This rule is not intended to have a retroactive 
effect. This rule will not preempt any state or local laws, 
regulations, or policies, unless they present an irreconcilable 
conflict with this rule.
    The Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 
U.S.C. 601-674), provides that administrative proceedings must be 
exhausted before parties may file suit in court. Under section 
608c(15)(A) of the Act, any handler subject to an order may file with 
the Secretary a petition stating that the order, any provision of the 
order, or any obligation imposed in connection with the order is not in 
accordance with the law and requesting a modification of an order or to 
be exempted from the order. A handler is afforded the opportunity for a 
hearing on the petition. After a hearing, the Secretary would rule on 
the petition. The Act provides that the district court of the United 
States in any district in which the handler is an inhabitant, or has 
its principal place of business, has jurisdiction in equity to review 
the Secretary's ruling on the petition, provided a bill in equity is 
filed not later than 20 days after the date of the entry of the ruling.
    Prior documents in this proceeding:
    Notice of Hearing: Issued November 21, 1994; published November 25, 
1994 (59 FR 60574).
    Recommended Decision: Issued August 17, 1995; published August 24, 
1994 (60 FR 43986).
    Final Decision: Issued December 4, 1995; published December 18, 
1995 (60 FR 65023).

Findings and Determinations

    The findings and determinations hereinafter set forth supplement 
those that were made when the orders were issued and when they were 
amended. The previous findings and determinations are hereby ratified 
and confirmed, except where they may conflict with those set forth 
herein.
    (a) Findings. A public hearing was held upon certain proposed 
amendments to the tentative marketing agreements and to the orders 
regulating the handling of milk in the aforesaid marketing areas. The 
hearing was held pursuant to the provisions of the Agricultural 
Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674), and the 
applicable rules of practice and procedure (7 CFR Part 900).
    Upon the basis of the evidence introduced at such hearing and the 
record thereof, it is found that:
    (1) The said orders as hereby amended, and all the terms and 
conditions thereof, will tend to effectuate the declared policy of the 
Act;
    (2) The parity prices of milk, as determined pursuant to section 2 
of the Act, are not reasonable in view of the price of feeds, available 
supplies of feeds, and other economic conditions which affect market 
supply and demand for milk in the marketing areas. The minimum prices 
specified in the orders, as hereby amended, are such prices as will 
reflect the aforesaid factors, insure a sufficient quantity of pure and 
wholesome milk, and be in the public interest; and
    (3) The said orders, as hereby amended, will regulate the handling 
of milk in the same manner as, and will be applicable only to persons 
in the respective classes of industrial and commercial activity 
specified in, marketing agreements upon which a hearing has been held.
    (b) Determinations. It is hereby determined that:
    (1) The refusal or failure of handlers (excluding cooperative 
associations specified in Sec. 8c(9) of the Act) of more than 50 
percent of the milk which is marketed within the aforesaid marketing 
areas to sign a proposed marketing agreement tends to prevent the 
effectuation of the declared policy of the Act;
    (2) The issuance of this order amending the orders is the only 
practical means pursuant to the declared policy of the Act of advancing 
the interests of producers as defined in the orders as hereby amended; 
and
    (3) The issuance of the order amending the orders is favored by at 
least two-thirds of the producers who during August 1995 were engaged 
in the production of milk for sale in the aforesaid marketing areas.

List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 1005, 1011, 1046

    Milk marketing orders. 
    
[[Page 1148]]

Order Relative to Handling

    It is therefore ordered, that on and after the effective date 
hereof, the handling of milk in each of the specified marketing areas 
shall be in conformity to and in compliance with the terms and 
conditions of the orders, as amended, and as hereby further amended, as 
follows:
    1. The authority citation for 7 CFR parts 1005, 1011, and 1046 
continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601-674.

PART 1005--MILK IN THE CAROLINA MARKETING AREA

    2. In Sec. 1005.7, the reference ``(d)'' in the introductory text 
is revised to read ``(e)'', in paragraph (b) the words ``Director of 
the Dairy Division'' and ``Director'' are revised to ``market 
administrator'' wherever they appear, paragraph (d) is redesignated as 
paragraph (e) and revised, and a new paragraph (d) is added to read as 
follows:

Sec. 1005.7  Pool plant.

* * * * *
    (d) A plant located within the marketing area (other than a 
producer-handler plant or a governmental agency plant) that meets the 
qualifications described in paragraph (a) of this section regardless of 
its quantity of route disposition in any other Federal order marketing 
area.
    (e) The term ``pool plant'' shall not apply to the following 
plants:
    (1) A producer-handler plant;
    (2) A governmental agency plant;
    (3) A plant with route disposition in this marketing area that is 
located within the marketing area of another Federal order and that is 
fully regulated under such order;
    (4) A plant qualified pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section 
which is not located within any Federal order marketing area but which 
also meets the pooling requirements of another Federal order and from 
which there is a greater quantity of route disposition, except filled 
milk, during the month in such other Federal order marketing area than 
in this marketing area; and
    (5) A plant qualified pursuant to paragraph (b) of this section if 
the plant has automatic pooling status under another Federal order or 
if the plant meets the pooling requirements of another Federal order 
during the month and makes greater qualifying shipments to plants 
regulated under such other order than to plants regulated under this 
order.

Sec. 1005.32  [Amended]

    3. In Sec. 1005.32(a), the words ``March through June'' are revised 
to read ``February through May'' wherever they appear.
    4. In Sec. 1005.53, paragraph (a)(6) is redesignated as paragraph 
(a)(7) and revised, and a new paragraph (a)(6) is added to read as 
follows:

Sec. 1005.53  Plant location adjustments for handlers.

* * * * *
    (a) * * *
    (6) For a plant located within the Middle Atlantic Federal Order 
Marketing Area (Part 1004), the adjustment shall be computed by 
subtracting the base zone Class I price specified in Sec. 1005.50(a) 
from the Class I price applicable at such plant under the Middle 
Atlantic Federal Order; and
    (7) For a plant located outside the areas specified in paragraphs 
(a)(1) through (a)(6) of this section, the adjustment shall be a minus 
2.5 cents for each 10 miles or fraction thereof (by the shortest hard-
surfaced highway distance as determined by the market administrator) 
that such plant is from the nearer of the city halls in Greenville, 
South Carolina, or Charlotte or Greensboro, North Carolina.

Sec. 1005.61  [Amended]

    5. In Sec. 1005.61 paragraphs (a) introductory text and (a)(5), the 
words ``July through February'' are revised to read ``June through 
January'' and in paragraph (b) introductory text the words ``March 
through June'' are revised to read ``February through May''.

Secs. 1005.90 and 1005.91  [Amended]

    6. In Secs. 1005.90 and 1005.91, the words ``March through June'' 
are revised to read ``February through May'' wherever they appear.

Sec. 1005.93  [Amended]

    7. In Sec. 1005.93 paragraph (b), the words ``March through June'' 
are revised to read ``February through May'' wherever they appear, the 
words ``February 1'' are revised to read ``January 1'', and in 
paragraph (e) introductory text the words ``March 1'' are revised to 
read ``February 1''.

Sec. 1005.94  [Amended]

    8. In Sec. 1005.94, the words ``February 1'' are revised to read 
``January 1''.

PART 1011--MILK IN THE TENNESSEE VALLEY MARKETING AREA

    9. Section 1011.2 is amended by revising paragraph (b) to read as 
follows:

Sec. 1011.2  Tennessee Valley Marketing Area.

* * * * *
    (b) In Kentucky, the counties of Bell, Breathitt, Clay, Harlan, 
Jackson, Knott, Knox, Laurel, Leslie, Letcher, McCreary, Owsley, Perry, 
Pulaski, Rockcastle, and Whitley.
* * * * *
    10. In Sec. 1011.7, the reference ``(d)'' in the introductory text 
is revised to read ``(e)'', paragraph (b) is revised, paragraph (d) is 
redesignated as paragraph (e) and revised, and a new paragraph (d) is 
added to read as follows:

Sec. 1011.7  Pool plant.

* * * * *
    (b) A plant, other than a plant described in paragraph (a) of this 
section, from which fluid milk products, except filled milk, are 
shipped to plants described in paragraph (a) of this section subject to 
the following additional conditions:
    (1) During the months of August through November, January and 
February, such shipments must equal not less than 60 percent (40 
percent during the months of December and March through July) of the 
total quantity of milk approved by a duly constituted regulatory agency 
for fluid consumption that is received during the month at such plant 
from handlers described in Sec. 1011.9(c) and (d) and from dairy 
farmers, including milk that is diverted from the plant pursuant to 
Sec. 1011.13 but excluding milk diverted to the plant;
    (2) The operator of a plant described in this paragraph may include 
milk diverted from the plant to plants described in paragraph (a) of 
this section for up to one-half of the shipments required pursuant to 
this paragraph;
    (3) A plant which meets the shipping requirements specified in this 
paragraph during the months of July through February shall be a pool 
plant during the following months of March through June unless the milk 
received at the plant does not continue to meet the requirements of a 
duly constituted regulatory agency, the plant fails to meet a shipping 
requirement instituted pursuant to paragraph (b)(4) of this section, or 
a written application is filed by the plant operator with the market 
administrator on or before the first day of any such month requesting 
that the plant be designated a nonpool plant for such month and for 
each subsequent month through June during which it would not otherwise 
qualify as a pool plant; and
    (4) The shipping requirements described in paragraph (b)(1) and 
(b)(3) of this section may be increased or decreased up to 10 
percentage points by the market administrator if he or she 

[[Page 1149]]
finds that revision is necessary to obtain needed shipments or to 
prevent uneconomic shipments. Before making such a finding, the market 
administrator shall investigate the need for revision either at his or 
her own initiative or at the request of interested persons. If the 
investigation shows that a revision may be appropriate, the market 
administrator shall issue a notice stating that the revision is being 
considered and invite data, views, and arguments.
* * * * *
    (d) A plant located within the marketing area (other than a 
producer-handler plant or a governmental agency plant) that meets the 
qualifications described in paragraph (a) of this section regardless of 
its quantity of route disposition in any other Federal order marketing 
area.
    (e) The term ``pool plant'' shall not apply to the following 
plants:
    (1) A producer-handler plant;
    (2) A governmental agency plant;
    (3) A plant with route disposition in this marketing area that is 
located within the marketing area of another Federal order and that is 
fully regulated under such order;
    (4) A plant qualified pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section 
which is not located within any Federal order marketing area but which 
also meets the pooling requirements of another Federal order and from 
which there is a greater quantity of route disposition, except filled 
milk, during the month in such other Federal order marketing area than 
in this marketing area; and
    (5) A plant qualified pursuant to paragraph (b) of this section if 
the plant has automatic pooling status under another Federal order or 
if the plant meets the pooling requirements of another Federal order 
during the month and makes greater qualifying shipments to plants 
regulated under such other order than to plants regulated under this 
order.

Sec. 1011.13  [Amended]

    11. In Sec. 1011.13 paragraph (e)(3), the words ``Director of the 
Dairy Division'' and ``Director'' are revised to read ``market 
administrator'' wherever they appear.
    12. Section 1011.52(a)(3) is revised to read as follows:

Sec. 1011.52  Plant location adjustments for handlers.

    (a) * * *
    (3) For such milk which is physically received at a plant located 
within the Kentucky counties of Bell, Breathitt, Clay, Harlan, Jackson, 
Knott, Knox, Laurel, Leslie, Letcher, McCreary, Owsley, Perry, Pulaski, 
Rockcastle, and Whitley, the Class I price shall be decreased by 32 
cents; and
* * * * *

PART 1046--MILK IN THE LOUISVILLE-LEXINGTON-EVANSVILLE MARKETING 
AREA

Sec. 1046.2  [Amended]

    13. In Sec. 1046.2, in the list of Kentucky counties, the word 
``Pulaski'' is removed.

    Dated: January 2, 1996.
Michael V. Dunn,
Assistant Secretary, Marketing and Regulatory Programs.
[FR Doc. 96-324 Filed 1-16-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P

Complete official Federal Register PDF

FR Doc. 96-265 General Services Administration Acquisition Regulation; Implementation of FASA Small Business; Protest, Disputes and Appeals; Subcontractor Payments Rules, and Service Contract Funding
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 11 (Wednesday, January 17, 1996)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 1150-1152]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-265]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION

48 CFR Parts 505, 519, 520, 532, 533, and 552

[APD 2800.12A, CHGE 69]
RIN 3090-AF87

General Services Administration Acquisition Regulation; 
Implementation of FASA Small Business; Protest, Disputes and Appeals; 
Subcontractor Payments Rules, and Service Contract Funding

AGENCY: Office of Acquisition Policy, GSA.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The General Services Administration Acquisition Regulation 
(GSAR) is amended to implement several sections of the Federal 
Acquisition Streamlining Act of 1994 (Pub. L. 103-355) which related to 
protests, disputes and appeals; subcontractor payments, service 
contract funding and small business programs. This change revises the 
GSAR to accommodate those changes and to reflect current organizational 
changes within GSA. In addition, GSA Form 2677, Minority Contract Fact 
Sheet, is removed and GSA Form 2689, Procurement Not Set Aside, is 
revised to illustrate the new edition of the form.

EFFECTIVE DATE: December 29, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Victoria Moss, Office of GSA 
Acquisition Policy, (202) 501-4764.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

A. Public Comments

    This rule was not published in the Federal Register for public 
comment because it merely revises the GSAR to conform to the Federal 
Acquisition Regulation (FAR) and makes organizational changes within 
GSA.

B. Executive Order 12866

    This rule was not submitted to the Office of Management and Budget 
for review because it is not a significant rule as defined in Executive 
Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review.

C. Regulatory Flexibility Act

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act does not apply because this rule is 
not a significant revision as defined in FAR 1.501-1.

D. Paperwork Reduction Act

    This rule does not impose any information collection or 
recordkeeping requirements that require the approval of OMB under 44 
U.S.C. 3501 et seq. Therefore, the requirements of the Paperwork 
Reduction Act do not apply.

List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 505, 519, 520, 532, 533, and 552

    Government procurement.

    Accordingly, 48 CFR Parts 505, 519, 520, 532, 533 and 552 are 
amended as follows:
    1. The authority citation for 48 CFR Parts 505, 519, 520, 532, 533, 
and 552 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 40 U.S.C. 486(c).

PART 505--PUBLICIZING CONTRACT ACTIONS

    2. Section 505.303-70 is amended by revising paragraphs (a)(1), 
(b)(1), (b)(2), and (b)(3)(ii) to read as follows:

505.303-70  Notification of proposed substantial awards and awards 
involving Congressional interest.

    (a) * * *
    (1) A contract with the Small Business Administration (the 8(a) 
program) exceeding or estimated to exceed $100,000.
* * * * *
    (b) * * *
    (1) The Office of Congressional and Intergovernmental Affairs (S) 
will notify the heads of contracting activities in writing with the 
names of Members of Congress who wish to be notified of any or all 
contract awards in excess of $100,000 to contractors located within 
their district or State, as applicable. Upon such notification, the 
contracting activities will provide, via electronic mail, facsimile or 
hand delivery applicable notices of award to S. A copy of the submittal 
should be provided to the regional congressional liaison office.
    (2) Except for submittals hand delivered to S, the submittal must 
be made by electronic mail or facsimile transmission. Except for 
contracts awarded under urgent and compelling circumstances, 
notification to S of an award must made on the same day that the award 
is made and 24 hours before telephonic notice (if applicable) is 
provided to the contractor. If the timeframe for notification to S 
cannot be met, the Contracting Director must notify S by telephone.
    (3) * * *
    (ii) Identify the type of contract and contractor using the 
following codes:
    (A) DO for definite quantity contract.
    (B) SC for schedule contract.
    (C) TC for indefinite delivery contract other than schedule.
    (D) S for small business concern.
    (E) SD for small disadvantaged business concern.
    (F) WO for women-owned small business concern.
    (G) O for other than a small business concern.
* * * * *
    3. Part 519 is amended by revising the heading to read as follows:

PART 519--SMALL BUSINESS PROGRAMS

    4. Section 519.001 is revised to read as follows:

519.001  Definitions.

    Agency small business technical advisors (SBTAs) as used in this 
part, means the individuals designated in writing by the Office of 
Enterprise Development (E). In addition to the duties outlined at FAR 
19.201(c), the agency small business technical advisors perform the 
functions of the small business specialist described in FAR 19.506 (a) 
and (b) and 19.705-4(d)(5).

    5. Section 519.201 is revised to read as follows:

519.201  General policy.

    The Associate Administrator for Enterprise Development (E) may make 
recommendations to the contracting officer as to whether a particular 
acquisition should be awarded under 

[[Page 1151]]
FAR 19.5 as a set-aside or under FAR 19.8 as a section 8(a) award 
directly or through the SBTA.
    6. Section 519.202-2 is revised to read as follows:

519.202-2  Locating small business sources.

    Contracting officers should request assistance from SBTAs in 
locating small business sources.

519.202-5  [Removed]

    7. Section 519.202-5 is removed.
    8. Section 519.502-70 is amended by revising paragraphs (a) and (d) 
to read as follows:

519.502-70  Review of non-set-aside determinations.

    (a) If the contracting officer decides that a procurement that is 
expected to exceed $100,000 cannot be set aside for small business, the 
reasons for the decision must be recorded on the GSA Form 2689, 
Procurement Not Set Aside. The GSA Form 2689 must be submitted to the 
SBTA for review and coordination with the SBA.
* * * * *
    (d) Before the GSA or SBA reviewing officials provide additional 
small business sources to the contracting officer when requesting 
reconsideration of the non-set-aside determination, the reviewing 
officials shall contact the sources to ensure the sources are 
interested in submitting offers and to obtain information regarding the 
capability of the sources to fulfill the Government's requirements. The 
information obtained should be provided to the contracting officer for 
consideration.
* * * * *

519.503  [Amended]

    9. Section 519.503 is amended in the last sentence of paragraph (b) 
format: ``Small Business Class Set-Aside Determination,'' by removing 
the words ``for which small purchase procedures are to be used'' and 
inserting in their place ``of $100,000 or less.''

519.602-3  [Amended]

    10. Section 519.602-3 is amended by removing the office symbol 
``AU'' once in paragraph (a) and where it appears three times in 
paragraph (b) and inserting office symbol ``E'' in its place.
    11. Subpart 519.7 is amended by revising the heading to read as 
follows.

Subpart 519.7  Subcontracting With Small Business, Small 
Disadvantaged Business and Women-Owned Small Business Concerns

    12. Section 519.708 is revised to read as follows:

519.708  Solicitation provisions and contract clauses.

    (a) The contracting officer shall insert the provision at 552.219-
72, Notice to Offerors of Subcontracting Plan Requirements, on the 
cover page of the solicitation if the solicitation includes the clause 
at FAR 52.219-9, Small, Small Disadvantaged and Women-Owned Small 
Business Subcontracting Plan.
    (b) The contracting officer shall insert the provision at 552.219-
73, Preparation, Submission, and Negotiation of Subcontracting Plans, 
in negotiated solicitations if the solicitation includes the clause at 
FAR 52.219-9, Small, Small Disadvantaged and Women-Owned Small Business 
Subcontracting Plan, and the contract will be awarded on the basis of 
an evaluation of technical and/or management proposals and cost or 
price proposals using source selection procedures. The provision does 
not apply to (1) solicitations for commercial products, or (2) 
solicitations where, in the judgment of the contracting officer, 
subcontracting opportunities are minimal.
    (c) The contracting officer shall insert the provision at 552.219-
74, Goals for Subcontracting Plan, in sealed bid solicitations if the 
solicitation includes the clause at FAR 52.219-9, Small, Small 
Disadvantaged and Women-Owned Small Business Subcontracting Plan. The 
basic provision should be used when the contracting officer is able to 
realistically establish target goals. Alternate 1 should be used in 
sealed bid solicitations when the contracting officer cannot establish 
realistic target goals and in negotiated solicitations that include the 
clause at FAR 52.219-9 but do not include the provision at 552.219-73.

    13. Section 519.803-70 is revised to read as follows:

519.803-70  Contracting officer evaluation of recommendations for 8(a) 
set-aside(s).

    If the Associate Administrator for Enterprise Development (E) or 
the SBTA recommends that a procurement be set aside for award under the 
8(a) program and the contracting officer disagrees, the contracting 
officer shall discuss the matter with the official that made the 
recommendation before making a decision. If the contracting officer 
decides not to award the contract under the 8(a) program as 
recommended, the reasons for the decision must be documented for the 
record as required by FAR 19.202 and a copy of the documentation must 
be forwarded to E within 10 working days of the contracting officer's 
decision.

PART 520--[RESERVED]

    14. Part 520 is removed and reserved.

PART 532--CONTRACTING FINANCING

    15. Sections 532.112 and 532.112-1 are added to read as follows:

532.112  Payment of subcontractors under contracts for non-commercial 
items.

532.112-1  Subcontractor assertions of nonpayment.

    Contracting officers who determine that a certification of payment 
of a subcontractor or supplier under FAR 32.112-1 is inaccurate in any 
material respect shall report the matter to the Office of Inspector 
General. If appropriate, the Office of Inspector General will forward a 
report and recommendation to the Department of Justice.

    16. Section 532.705-1 is revised to read as follows:

532.705-1  Clauses for contracting in advance of funds.

    The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 552.232-77, 
Availability of Funds, in solicitations and contracts for services 
which are ``severable'' when the contact, or a portion of the contract, 
will be chargeable to funds of the new fiscal year and the 
circumstances described in the prescriptions for the FAR clauses at 
52.232-18 or 52.232-19 do not apply.

PART 533--PROTESTS, DISPUTES, AND APPEALS

    17. In Section 533.104 paragraph (a) the heading is revised to 
read: ``General procedures,'' the FAR cite in paragraph (a)(1) is 
revised to read ``FAR 33.104(a)(3);'' remove ``25 workdays'' in 
paragraph (a)(3)(v) and insert ``35 days,''; revise the FAR cite in 
paragraph (b)(5) introductory text to read ``FAR 33.104(a)(2), remove 
the words ``within 7 calendar days of receiving this notice'' in the 
last paragraph of (a)(5), remove the word ``calendar'' in the first 
sentence of paragraph (b), and revise paragraphs (c) and (d) to read as 
follows:

533.104  Protests to GAO.

* * * * *
    (c) Protests after award. If the protest is received from GAO (not 
from protester or any other party) within the time periods specified in 
FAR 33.104(c) contract performance must be suspended unless the HCA 
determines in writing that contract performance is in the best 
interests of the United States 

[[Page 1152]]
or that urgent and compelling circumstances that significantly affect 
the interests of the United States do not permit waiting for the GAO's 
decision. The written determination and findings (D&F), in the format 
shown at 501.704-70(e)(2), should be prepared by the contracting 
officer for signature of the HCA. The D&F must be concurred in by the 
Regional Counsel (on regional procurements), and the appropriate AGC. 
After the D&F is approved, it must be returned to the AGC who notifies 
GAO of the agency's findings and intended action before contract 
performance is authorized.
    (d) Notice to GAO. The HCA responsible for the solicitation, 
proposed award, or award of the contract must report to the Comptroller 
General through the OGC within 65 days of receipt of the GAO's 
recommendation if the agency has decided not to comply with the 
recommendation. The report must explain the reasons why the GAO's 
recommendation will not be followed.

533.105  [Amended]

    18. In section 533.105 paragraph (a)(1) introductory text, remove 
the words ``Resources Management'' after the word ``Information'' and 
insert in their place ``Technology.''

PART 552--SOLICITATION PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSES

552.219-9  [Removed]

    19. Section 552.219-9 and its Alternate I are removed.

552.219-16  [Removed]

    20. Section 552.219-16 is removed.
    21. Section 552.219-72 is revised to read as follows:

552.219-72  Notice to Offerors of Subcontracting Plan Requirements.

    As prescribed in 519.708(a), insert the following provision:

NOTICE OF OFFERORS OF SUBCONTRACTING PLAN REQUIREMENTS (DEC 1995)

    The General Services Administration (GSA) is committed to 
assuring that maximum practicable opportunity is provided to small, 
small disadvantaged, and women-owned small business concerns to 
participate in the performance of this contract consistent with its 
efficient performance. GSA expects any subcontracting plan submitted 
pursuant to FAR 52.219-9, Small, Small Disadvantaged and Women Owned 
Small Business Subcontracting Plan, to reflect this commitment. 
Consequently, an offeror, other than a small business concern, 
before being awarded a contract exceeding $500,000 ($1,000,000 for 
construction) will be required to demonstrate that its 
subcontracting plan represents a creative and innovative program for 
involving small, small disadvantaged, and women-owned small business 
concerns as subcontractors in the performance of this contract.

(End of Provision)

552.219-73  [Amended]

    22. In section 552.219-73 introductory text revise the GSAR cite to 
read ``519.708(b),'' and revise the date of the clause to read ``DEC 
1995''; in paragraph (b) of the clause remove the GSAR cite ``552.219-
9(d)'' and insert in its place ``FAR 52.219-9(d).'' Also in paragraph 
(b) second sentence, revise the phrase ``Small Business'' to read 
``Small, Small Disadvantaged and Women-Owned Small Business''; in 
paragraph (c)(1) remove ``552.219-9'' and insert in its place ``FAR 
52.219-9.''

552.219-74  [Amended]

    23. In section 552.219-74 introductory text, revise the GSAR cite 
to read ``519.708(c),'' revise the clause date to read ``(DEC 1995),'' 
in paragraph (a)(1) of the clause remove all the text after the word 
``at'' at the end of paragraph (a)(1) and insert in its place ``FAR 
52.219-9, Small, Small Disadvantaged and Women-Owned Small Business 
Subcontracting Plan;'' in paragraph (a)(2) remove ``552.219-9(d)'' and 
insert in its place ``FAR 52.219-9(d); in paragraph (c)(1) remove 
``552.219-9'' and insert in its place ``FAR 52.219-9.''

    Dated: December 14, 1995.
Ida M. Ustad,
Associate Administrator for Acquisition Policy.
[FR Doc. 96-265 Filed 1-16-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-61-M

Complete official Federal Register PDF

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.