us-ftc-advisory-opinions-ca66782f35567250c56943bf40a9ddde•Health Care Management Associates
Health Care Management Associates
us-ftc-advisory-opinions-ca66782f35567250c56943bf40a9dddeHealth Care Management AssociatesGuidance
re: Concerning a PPO organized by an independent intermediary between physicians and payers.
5
..
-. FEDERAL fRADE COMMISSlON
JUN 7 1983
Irwin S. Saith, M.D.
President
H e a l t h C a r e Management Associates
P e O eB o x 476
iLi0areitown9 N c r Jecsry 08i57 . .
Dear Gr. a i t h :
T h i s letter responds to your request for a n advisory opinion
concerning a proposed n C o o p e r a t i n g Provider P r o g r m n ( n C P P w ) by
Beaith C a r e Kanagement Associates ("Hadn) for the organization,
financing, and delivery of health c a r e services. EiGiiA is a pri-
vate, for-profit firm incorporated under the laws of the S t a t e o f
Wew Jersey. Its purpose is 'to provide professionar consulting a n d
administrative services in order to promote cost-containment in the
heaith care industry." Y o u a l s o have informed us that "no actively
practicing provider, hospital, payer ( e m p l o y e r or insurer) haq any
direct or indireet financial, controlling, or non-controlling
interest in IX&Arn
T h e C o m n i s s i o n understands that nQLci w i s h e s to establish and
operate the Cooperating Provider P r o g r a m "to promote competition
. . . by encouraging the awareness of cost [ o f health care] on the
part o f the user and t o - ' p r e s s u r e ' individual physicians, hospitals
and other PPOs [preferred provider organizations) to be cost com-
petitive . . . ." The C o o p e r a t i n g Provider P r o g r a m is a variation
on the so-called "preferred provider organization," or "PPO," w i t h
WiA serving as the intermediary between health care pryriders
wishing to " s e l i n their services and third-party payers- wisliing
to n p u r c h a s e * those p r o v i d e r s ' s e r v i c e s on b e h a l f of their insureds,
"or beneficiaries.
8 li Third-party payers, such as insurance c o m p a n i e s , service benefit
companies or employers, are entities that either reimburse
patients for ali or part of the cost of medical and health care
services or make direct payments to providers of those services
on behalf of patients.
Hrwin S 2ith, M.D. P a g e 2 intends to contraet individually w i t h health care pro- viders such as allopathic and osteopathic physicians, podiatrists., oral surgeons, clinical psychologists, and possibly also optome- trists, dentists, nurse m i d w i v e s , and physical therapists. HQllA will not enter into cooperating provider agreements with any groups or organizations of independently practicing c o m ~ e t i n gproviders; it may enter into s u c h agreements with integrated group practices, professional partnerships, and institutions employing salaried professional staff. "Cooperating providersm will a g r e e to provide health care services. to insureds o r - b e n e f i c i a r i e s covered by third- pasty payers that eontract .with m I A to o f f e r the C o o p e ~ L t i n g provider Program. c o o p e r a t i n g providers will total not more t h a n 10-15 percent of all local a r e a providers, w i t h this participation rate relatively u n i f o r m across specialties. Cooperating providers will have a choice between two m e t h o d s o f reimbursement determined by HQU: 1) the lesser of the c h a r g e s submitted by the cooperating provider or a m a x i m u m payment schedule f o r services determined b y HQW; or 2) the c o o p e r a t i n g provider's "usual, customary and reasonableR f e e for. the service, less a per- centage discount ( u p to a m a x i m u m o f iS percent) as set forth in the third-party payer's cQntract w i t h WbW. Each c o q e r a t i n g 8 provider will decide independently whether to contract with and will continue to set his or her charges for services inde- pendent o f any other cooperating providers. N o t h i n g in the Cooperating Provider P r o g r a m or the cooperating provide-r agreement will affect the charges that a cooperating provider m a y make to * patients not' covered by the C o o p e r a t i n g Provider Program. Reimbursement to a cooperating provider under the C o o p e r a t i n g Pro- vider P r o g r a m for services covered by the p r o g r a m will constitute payment in full to the cooperating provider, HGMA will prepare and periodically update a directory or' "cooperating p r o v i d e r s n for distribution to persons covered by third-party payers under the C o o p e r a t i n g Provider Program. T h i r d - party payers using the C o o p e r a t i n g Provider P r o g r a m will incor- porate in their c o v e r a g e provisions certain f i n a n c i a l - i n c e n t i v e s for persons covered under the C o o p e r a t i n g Provider P r o g r a m to encourage use of the services o f cooperating providers. Benefi- ciaries remain free, however, to obtain covered services from providers w h o are not "cooperating providers," albeit at the cost o f incurring some additional, -ut-of-pocket expense that would not exist i i a cooperating provide. a r e used.
8 I r w i n S . Smith, M.D. P a g e 3 will negotiate eontracts for Cooperating Provider P r o g r m services w i t h third-party payers, such as eomnereial insurance c a r r i e r s and self-funded or self-insured employer groups. T h e s e p a y e r s make all claims payments, and underwr i te any insurance risk. E C U does not act as a n insurer in the C o o p e r a t i n g Provider Program. HCXA a l s o will provide utilization r e v i e w and quality assurance services under the Cooper at ing Provider Program, As pay- ment for its services, l3Ch4A will receive an annual fee negotiated w i t h each third-party payer. Cooperating providers will m a k e n o p a p e n t to %a&,. aithough a "nonainal annual lnembershlp f e e n m y be initiated at a later date. plans to market the Cooperating Provider P r o g r a m initially in Burlington, C a m d e n , and Gloucester C o u n t i e s of N e w Jersey, with- possible expansion to adjacent counties in the future. T h e primary market for the C o o p e r a t i n g Provider P r o g r a m consists o f those per- sons in this geographic area w h o are covered under eomnercial and self-insurance programs, estimated to be approximately 30 percent o f the total employed population of the area. ~ o t h i n g in the program prohibits or limits participating pro- viders from contracting w i t h ne partixipating in the programs of any other PPO, HMO, or othe'r third-party payer. Similarly, third- party payers participating in the C o o p e r a t i n g Provi'der P r o g r a m remain free to engage in other programs. T h e proposed Cooperating Provi.der Program, in essence, w o u l d be a form of vertical arrangement between individual sellers o f services ( c o o p e r a t i n g providers) and purchasers of services (third- party payers, on behalf of their insureds or beneficiaries) f o r the saie and purchase of health care services. HCW proposes to faeil- itate these transactions b y performing certain functions m u c h like an agent or broker. HC&iA is not itself a primary party to the underiying transaction. Also, the C o o p e r a t i n g Provider P r o g r a m involves no agreements among eitber competing providers or third- party payers concerning any aspect of their involvement in the program. Based on the description of the Cooperating Provider P r o g r a m outiined above and further detailed in your submissions, i t is t h e C o m n i s s i o n l s o p i n i o n that operation of the program wouid not con- stitute a horizontal or vertical price fixing arrangement or an unlawfui joint sales agency arrangement. Nor does the C o o p e r a t i n g Provider Program, as described, raise a colorable c l a i m oi boycott or concerted r e f u s a l to deal under the antitrust laws. F i n a l i y ,
Irwin S . Smith, b1.D. Page 4 the program, as described, contains no suggestion of a s p e c i f i c . intent to monopolize, nor does HCahA appear to be capable o f acquiring, maintaining, or improperly using inonupoly power. i t appears, moreover, that the Cooperating Provider Program proposed bg is likely to be procompetitive, both by generating coma petition between cooperating providers and other local providers and by increasing competition a m n g third-party payers. It is the comnission" opinion th4t this program would not violate t h e -1Fedcral T r a d e 42 i s s i o n 2 P t Qr any provision o f antitrust law the C ~ m i s ~ i o n orqes .- ission retains the right to reconsider the questions involved, and to rescind or revoke its opinion with notice to t h e requesting party in accordance w i t h Seetion 1 . 3 ( b ) of the R u l e s of Practice, if the implementation of the cooperating Provider P r o g r a m results in anticompetitive effects, the purposes o f the program no longer remain legitimate, or the public interest dtherwise so requires. . By direction of the C o m i s s i o n , SIGNED & MALEW Emi1y.H. R o c k Secretary 2.1 T h i s Advisory Opinion, like all those the Comnission issues, is limited to the proposed conduct described in the request being considered. T h e r e f o r e , i t does not constitute approval for actions that are different f r o m those described, or those not specified, in the request. Nor does this Advisory Opinion conclude or imply that to avoid illegality under the antitrust iaws a PPO must be structured and operated in every respect like HC;MAts Cooperating Provider Program.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.