0101004 Informal Interpretation

us-ftc-hsr-informal-interpretations-16097e79d87711864f0fd22893486d200101004 Informal InterpretationGuidance

Date
Rule
801.1(d)
Staff
Michael Verne
Response/Comments
Advised the writer that based on the totality of the facts presented, we would deem this corporation to be a foreign issuer. N. Ovuka concurs. B. Michael Verne 1/7/02

Question

From: (redacted)

To: FT~.SERIUS("mverne@ FTC.gov")

Date: 1/7/02 3:44PM

Subject: Interpretation Re: "Principal Offices" Location for Purposes of "Foreign Issuer"

Exemption

Dear Mr. Verne:

As discussed on the telephone earlier this afternoon, this firm represents a company we believe to be a "foreign issuer" under section 801.1 (e)(2)(ii) of the HSR regulations. As I told you on the phone, the company is Canadian and is incorporated and organized under the laws of Canada. We also are of the view that its "principal offices" are in Canada, but that is the point on which we believe we could benefit from some interpretative guidance from your office. Therefore, as indicated on the telephone, I have typed up and attached a one-page summary of the factors I believe are most pertinent to determining the location of the company's "principal offices." I would greatly appreciate your views on the location of the company's principal offices based on the facts described in the attached. If you have questions or need more information don't hesitate to contact me- by either telephone (redacted) e-mail (redacted). Many thanks.

Sincerely,


Complete printed PDF page 1

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.