0906005 Informal Interpretation

us-ftc-hsr-informal-interpretations-1683579c6e166cbe7ef719bc72b27d910906005 Informal InterpretationGuidance

Date
Rule
801.10
Staff
Michael Verne
Response/Comments
Agree.

Question

From: (redacted)
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 10:36 AM
To: Verne, B. Michael

Subject: HSR Interpretation

June 11, 2009

B. Michael Verne
Premerger Notification Office
Federal Trade Commission
600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20580

Mike:

Thank you for taking the time to speak with me thispast Tuesday. I am writing to confirm the advice you provided. The facts andthe discussion are set forth below.

Background

Company A plans to acquire assets from Company Bout of bankruptcy if it is the winning bidder in a bankruptcy auction process.In addition to acquiring assets, Company A would reimburse Company B forcertain pre-paid expenses including rent on leases that will be assumed on agoing-forward basis.

Company A's bid to acquire the assets from CompanyB is supported by Company C, which is a creditor of Company B. Company A andCompany C have agreed that if Company A is the successful bidder for Company'sB assets in the auction that Company C would pay Company A certain amounts inconsideration of Company A agreeing to certain modifications to contractualrights with Company C that Company A would acquire from Company B. Company Chas also offered to Company B to forgive certain obligations owed by Company Bto Company C if Company A is selected as the winning bidder in the auction, althoughsuch forgiveness would not change the amount that Company A would pay toCompany B nor the amount that Company C would pay to Company A.

Discussion

As discussed, the reimbursement of pre-paidexpenses as described above is considered the acquisition of cash equivalents,which are exempt assets under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Actand are not included in determining the size of the transaction.

With respect to Company's C involvement, theforgiveness of certain obligations of Company B by Company C as described abovewould also not be included for purposes of determiningthe size of the transaction.

Thank you again foryour consideration and assistance in this matter. If you do not believe thisnote reflects the facts discussed in our telephone conversation, or if I havemisstated the advice you gave, please contact me as soon as possible.

Verne, B. Michael
From:
Sent: 	Thursday, June 11, 2009 10:36 AM
To: 	Verne, B. Michael
Subject: HSR Interpretation
June 11, 2009
B. Michael Verne
Premerger Notification Office
Federal Trade Commission
600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20580
Mike:
Page 1 of2
8 c \. \0
Thank you for taking the time to speak with me this past Tuesday. I am writing to confirm
the advice you provided. 	The facts and the discussion are set forth below.
Background
Company A plans to acquire assets from Company B out of bankruptcy if it is the winning
bidder in a bankruptcy auction process. 	In addition to acquiring assets, Company A would
reimburse Company B for certain pre-paid expenses including rent on leases that will be
assumed on a going-forward basis.
Company A's bid to acquire the assets from Company B is supported by Company C, which
is a creditor of Company B. 	Company A and Company C have agreed that if Company A is
the successful bidder for Company's B assets in the auction that Company C would
pay Company A certain amounts in consideration of Company A agreeing to certain
modifications to contractual rights with Company C that Company A would acquire from
Company B. Company C has also offered to Company B to forgive certain obligations
owed by Company B to Company C if Company A is selected as the winning bidder in the
auction, although such forgiveness would not change the amount that Company A would
pay to Company B nor the amount that Company C would pay to Company A.
Discussion
As discussed, the reimbursement of pre-paid expenses as described above is considered the
acquisition of cash equivalents, which are exempt assets under the Hart-Scott-Rodino
Antitrust Improvements Act and are not included in determining the size of the transaction.
With respect to Company's C involvement, the forgiveness of certain obligations of
Company B by Company C as described above would also not be included for purposes of
6111/2009 	r
Page 2 of2
determining the size of the transaction.
Thank you again for your consideration and assistance in this matter. 	If you do not believe
this note reflects the facts discussed in our telephone conversation, or if I have misstated the
advice you gave, please contact me as soon as possible.
Sincerely,
Circular 230 Disclaimer: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, we inform you that any
U.S. federal tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not intended or written to
be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding tax-related penalties under the Internal Revenue
Code or (ii) promoting , marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or tax-related matter(s)
addressed herein.
This message contains confidential information , intended only for the person(s) named above , which may also be
privileged. Any use , distribution , copying or disclosure by any other person is strictly prohibited. In such case, you
should delete this message and kindly notify the sender via reply e-mail. Please advise immediately if you or your
employer does not consent to Internet e-mail for messages of this kind.
practice in the State of 	is conducted by 	, a limited liability
partnership comprised of professional corporations.
611112009

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.