us-ftc-hsr-informal-interpretations-21001d10c3786aae957b9b0e8d57947b•8506002 Informal Interpretation
8506002 Informal Interpretation
us-ftc-hsr-informal-interpretations-21001d10c3786aae957b9b0e8d57947b8506002 Informal InterpretationGuidance
Question
(redacted)
June 18, 1985
Mr. Wayne Kaplan
Premerger Notification Office
Room 301
Federal Trade Commission
Washington, D.C. 20580
Dear Mr. Kaplan:
This letter is in confirmation of the advice I received from you in our telephone conversation on May 14, 1985. In that conversation, I described the following scenario:
Facts
A, a church, is the sole corporate member of B and C, two not-for-profit entities. X, a church body, is composed of 170 individual members, two of each of the 170 representing 85 religious congregations. X controls Y, a not-for-profit entity. B, C and Y desire to consolidate functionally their operations and the operations of the organizations which each owns or controls by the creation of a new not-for-profit corporation to be the sole member of B, C and Y.
Issue
Are A and X required to make premerger notification filings?
You advised me as follows:
Conclusion
A and X, as church bodies, are not cognizable persons under the Hart-Scott-Rodino rules, and, thus, not required to make premerger notification filings under the rules. filings should be made by B, C and Y.
I will act upon your advice unless I hear from you otherwise by June 28, 1985.
Thank you for your assistance.
Sincerely,
(redacted)
(redacted)
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.