0703006 Informal Interpretation

us-ftc-hsr-informal-interpretations-225a49709a7625c6250d37e6a49625330703006 Informal InterpretationGuidance

Date
Rule
801.2
Staff
Michael Verne
Response/Comments
Yes - the trademark and franchise agreements would be non-exempt assets. Only B and C would be required to file.

Question

From:(redacted)

Sent:Wednesday, March 07, 2007 6:34 PM

To:Verne, B. Michael

Subject:802.2(e)

Ihave a transaction in which Buyer A is buying the stock of Co B. B owns andoperates hotels, with no casinos or ski facilities. B also owns trademarks forits hotels and licenses the name to third-parties who operate franchises underthe hotel name. B no doubt receives revenue from these licenses that probablyis significant. In this transaction, A will buy B and one second later willsell the intellectual property and franchise agreements of B to C so that Aessentially becomes a franchisee of C.

Twoissues. Would you regard the ip associated with the licenses and franchiseagreements to third-parties as non-exempt?. If it is not exempt, and if thevalue exceeds the jurisdictional threshold, would you apply the transitory rulehere to require only filings by B and C, as the interests acquired and held byA all would be exempt?

Ilook forward to your response and hope all is well with you.


Complete printed PDF page 1

Complete printed PDF page 2

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.