us-ftc-hsr-informal-interpretations-27f01226b13218eeaa0ec5767fdd7ef0•2102004 Informal Interpretation
2102004 Informal Interpretation
us-ftc-hsr-informal-interpretations-27f01226b13218eeaa0ec5767fdd7ef02102004 Informal InterpretationGuidance
Tags:
1) Correct
2) Assuming the holdings you cite represent the rights to profits or assets upon dissolution, please list the UPE as “X and Y (spouses)” or you may just list “X and Y” and indicate for our benefit in Item 3 that they are spouses.
Question
From: Berg, Karen E.
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2021 11:51:35 AM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)
To: [Redacted]
Cc: [Redacted]
Subject: RE: Spousal Attribution/Identification of UPE
See below
From: [Redacted]
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2021 10:24:20 AM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)
To: [Redacted]
Subject: Spousal Attribution/Identification of UPE
I'm working on an HSR filing and wanted to check on whether I'm approaching this correctly.
X (an individual) and Y (likewise) were married in a same-sex union recognized by their state. Given the use of the term "spouse" in Rule 801.1(c)(2), I believe their holdings would therefore be attributed to one another. Is that correct? Correct
X holds 48.5% of an unincorporated entity (being acquired in the HSR-reportable transaction) and Y holds an additional 10.0% of that entity, which would be sufficient to make the entity controlled by X and Y. As a technical matter, how do I list the UPE on the Form itself? Is it simply "X and Y"? Assuming the holdings you cite represent the rights to profits or assets upon dissolution, please list the UPE as “X and Y (spouses)” or you may just list “X and Y” and indicate for our benefit in Item 3 that they are spouses.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.