us-ftc-hsr-informal-interpretations-2c17c446459299eb21a2a45c96c99da8•0604003 Informal Interpretation
0604003 Informal Interpretation
us-ftc-hsr-informal-interpretations-2c17c446459299eb21a2a45c96c99da80604003 Informal InterpretationGuidance
Question
From:(redacted)
Sent:Tuesday, April 11, 2006 9:27 AM
To:Verne, B. Michael
Subject:Informal Interpretation follow-up
Mike,
I wanted to follow up on our phone call of lastThursday. As you may recall, I called to discuss a transaction in which theacquiring person "A" is an agency of a foreign government. A controlsa U.S. LLC "B," which in turn controls U.S. LLC "C." C willmake an acquisition that we assumed would otherwise be Hart-Scott reportable.
My understanding, based on our conversation, is thatan acquisition by C would not be reportable because none of A, B, or C would beconsidered an "entity" under 16 C.F.R. sec. 801.1(a)(2). My understanding is that the carve-out to thisexemption contained in the parenthetical in sec. 801.1(a) (2) -- "otherthan a corporation engaged in commerce" -- is interpreted literally, suchthat an acquisition by a foreign government agency made through a controlledLLC or partnership is exempt, while an acquisition by a foreign governmentagency made through a controlled corporation is potentially reportable. In theinstant transaction, because the two entities controlled by A are both LLCs,they would not fall into the carve-out to the exemption.
Pleaselet me know if you disagree with the above analysis or if I have misstated anypart of our conversation. As always, thank you for your time and assistance.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.