1604004 Informal Interpretation

us-ftc-hsr-informal-interpretations-3331a956859687b6f6255d8e5ce611ce1604004 Informal InterpretationGuidance

Date

Tags:

Rule
801.2
Staff
Evan Storm
Response/Comments

There would be 2 filings here:

  1. B1 acquiring X from T
  2. B2 acquiring Y from T based on a continuum theory

Question

[REDACTED]

There would be 2 filings here:

  1. B1 acquiring X from T
  2. B2 acquiring Y from T based on a continuum theory

Regards

Evan

Evan Storm

Attorney

Premerger Notification Office

Federal Trade Commission

(202) 326-3193

estorm@ftc.gov

HSR filing questions? Check the PNO Blog and HSR Tips.

From: [REDACTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2016 9:46 AM
To: Walsh, Kathryn E.
Cc: [REDACTED]
Subject: Question on filing (0115728-0000001)

Kate,

We are inquiring about a reportable transaction we are working on. Target, T, intends to sell business X to Buyer 1, B1, and business Y to Buyer 2, B2. The transaction is structured as follows:

  • T will sell both business X and business Y to B1 (“Transaction 1”). B1 will immediately after sell business Y to B2 (“Transaction 2”).
  • The transactions are cross-conditional upon one another. Thus, Transaction 1 will not close if there is anything preventing Transaction 2 from closing. Likewise, Transaction 2 is conditional upon the closing of Transaction 1.
  • The agreements will be executed simultaneously.
  • Closing of Transaction 2 will take place on the same date at the same time and the same place as the closing of Transaction 1.
  • B2 is a third-party beneficiary to the agreement between T and B1 and can assert any rights against T that B1 can assert against T.

Based on these facts, we would view these transactions as two separate and simultaneous transactions, rather than as two sequential transactions. Thus, for HSR purposes, T (assuming it is its own UPE) will be the acquired person to Transaction 1 and also the acquired person to Transaction 2. B1 (assuming it is its own UPE) will be the acquiring person to Transaction 1 and B2 (assuming it is its own UPE) will be the acquiring person to Transaction 2. Please could you confirm that we are correct in our understanding?

Many thanks,

[REDACTED]

From: 	Storm, Evan
To:
Cc:
Subject: 	RE: Question on filing (0115728-0000001)
Date: 	Tuesday, April 12, 2016 1:09:00 PM
There would be 2 filings here:
1. 	B1 acquiring X from T
2. 	B2 acquiring Y from T based on a continuum theory
Regards
Evan
Evan Storm
Attorney
Premerger Notification Office
Federal Trade Commission
(202) 326-3193
estorm@ftc.gov
HSR filing questions? Check the PNO Blog and HSR Tips.
From:
Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2016 9:46 AM
To: Walsh, Kathryn E.
Cc:
Subject: Question on filing (0115728-0000001)
Kate,
We are inquiring about a reportable transaction we are working on. Target, T, intends to sell business X
to Buyer 1, B1, and business Y to Buyer 2, B2. The transaction is structured as follows:
· 	T will sell both business X and business Y to B1 (“Transaction 1”). B1 will immediately after sell
business Y to B2 (“Transaction 2”).
· 	The transactions are cross-conditional upon one another. Thus, Transaction 1 will not close if
there is anything preventing Transaction 2 from closing. Likewise, Transaction 2 is conditional
upon the closing of Transaction 1.
· 	The agreements will be executed simultaneously.
· 	Closing of Transaction 2 will take place on the same date at the same time and the same place
as the closing of Transaction 1.
· 	B2 is a third-party beneficiary to the agreement between T and B1 and can assert any rights
against T that B1 can assert against T.
Based on these facts, we would view these transactions as two separate and simultaneous transactions,
rather than as two sequential transactions. Thus, for HSR purposes, T (assuming it is its own UPE) will
be the acquired person to Transaction 1 and also the acquired person to Transaction 2. B1 (assuming it
is its own UPE) will be the acquiring person to Transaction 1 and B2 (assuming it is its own UPE) will be
Complete printed PDF page 1
the acquiring person to Transaction 2. Please could you confirm that we are correct in our
understanding?
Many thanks,
Complete printed PDF page 2

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.