us-ftc-hsr-informal-interpretations-395cb7cbfc5ed398ca5064544cb29de6•1810001 Informal Interpretation
1810001 Informal Interpretation
us-ftc-hsr-informal-interpretations-395cb7cbfc5ed398ca5064544cb29de61810001 Informal InterpretationGuidance
Tags:
Yes, if the issuer is a party to the agreement, then the transaction can be filed as an 801.30 or non-801.30.
Question
From: Shaffer, Kristin
Sent: Friday, October 5, 2018 3:42:59 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)
To: [Redacted]
Cc: [Redacted]
Subject: RE: Canadian Arrangement Agreement
Yes, if the issuer is a party to the agreement, then the transaction can be filed as an 801.30 or non-801.30.
Best regards,
Kristin
From: [Redacted]
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2018 12:53 PM
To: [Redacted]
Subject: Canadian Arrangement Agreement
When a publicly-traded issuer is a party to an Arrangement Agreement under Canadian law, is it correct that the transaction need not be treated as falling under 801.30(a)(5) and, therefore, 803.5(a)(1) notice is not required to be delivered to the issuer?
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.