us-ftc-hsr-informal-interpretations-497542bb73be33f40ffc2c4439a0b118•1605003 Informal Interpretation
1605003 Informal Interpretation
us-ftc-hsr-informal-interpretations-497542bb73be33f40ffc2c4439a0b1181605003 Informal InterpretationGuidance
Tags:
The word “executed” is not necessary in the buyer’s affidavit in an 801.30 filing.
Question
From: Walsh, Kathryn E.
Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2016 11:41 AM
To: [REDACTED]
Subject: RE: Your HSR Filing [REDACTED]
[REDACTED]:
We agree that “executed” is not necessary in the buyer’s affidavit in an 801.30 filing. In fact, there is really no reason for the buyer to mention any agreement(s) in its affidavit for an 801.30 transaction – reference to an agreement is not required, and may cause confusion about whether the transaction is actually an 801.30 or not. Of course, the buyer should discuss the agreement(s) in Item 3(a) and submit any agreement(s) with the filing.
Kate
From: [REDACTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2016 11:55 AM
To: 'Walsh, Kathryn E.'
Subject: RE: Your HSR Filing
Kate:
In an 801.30 transaction based on shareholder agreements, I wasn’t clear what is required in the buyer’s affidavit. Do I need to say “executed” agreements?
Many thanks,
[REDACTED]
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.