1605003 Informal Interpretation

us-ftc-hsr-informal-interpretations-497542bb73be33f40ffc2c4439a0b1181605003 Informal InterpretationGuidance

Date

Tags:

Rule
801.30; 803.5
Staff
Kate Walsh
Response/Comments

The word “executed” is not necessary in the buyer’s affidavit in an 801.30 filing.

Question

From: Walsh, Kathryn E.
Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2016 11:41 AM
To: [REDACTED]
Subject: RE: Your HSR Filing [REDACTED]

[REDACTED]:

We agree that “executed” is not necessary in the buyer’s affidavit in an 801.30 filing. In fact, there is really no reason for the buyer to mention any agreement(s) in its affidavit for an 801.30 transaction – reference to an agreement is not required, and may cause confusion about whether the transaction is actually an 801.30 or not. Of course, the buyer should discuss the agreement(s) in Item 3(a) and submit any agreement(s) with the filing.

Kate

From: [REDACTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2016 11:55 AM
To: 'Walsh, Kathryn E.'
Subject: RE: Your HSR Filing

Kate:

In an 801.30 transaction based on shareholder agreements, I wasn’t clear what is required in the buyer’s affidavit. Do I need to say “executed” agreements?

Many thanks,

[REDACTED]


Complete printed PDF page 1

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.