us-ftc-hsr-informal-interpretations-5010c825186b5dcbf51ad65e2287d623•2502007 Informal Interpretation
2502007 Informal Interpretation
us-ftc-hsr-informal-interpretations-5010c825186b5dcbf51ad65e2287d6232502007 Informal InterpretationGuidance
This is not a select 801.30, see 16 CFR Part 803, Appendix B.
Question
From: Larson, Peter
Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2025 2:12 PM
To: [Redacted]
Cc: HSRRuleReview
Subject: RE: Select 801.30 Transactions
This is not a select 801.30, see 16 CFR Part 803, Appendix B.
Best,
Peter
From: [Redacted]
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2025 9:10 PM
To: HSRRuleReview
Subject: Select 801.30 Transactions
Dear PNO:
I write to confirm whether a transaction qualifies as a “Select 801.30 transaction” under the new HSR rules. The definition of a Select 801.30 Transaction is:
A transaction to which § 801.30 applies and where (1) the acquisition would not confer control, (2) there is no agreement (or contemplated agreement) between any entity within the acquiring person and any entity within the acquired person governing any aspect of the transaction, and (3) the acquiring person does not have, and will not obtain, the right to serve as, appoint, veto, or approve board members, or members of any similar body, of any entity within the acquired person or the general partner or management company of any entity within the acquired person.
Company A received 801.30 notice from Investor 1 that Investor 1 intends to acquire additional voting securities that will exceed the next filing threshold in 16 CFR 801.1(h) (the “Acquisition”). Section 801.30 does apply to the Acquisition. There is no agreement or contemplated agreement between Investor 1 and Company A that governs any aspect of the Acquisition. Investor 1 will not acquire control of Company A as a result of the Acquisition. With respect to subpart (3) of the definition of Select 801.30 Transactions, a representative of Investor 1 does currently sit on Company A’s board. This board appointment occurred as a result of a December 2023 letter agreement entered into between Company A and Investor 1 in connection with Investor 1’s acquisition of pre-funded warrants to purchase Company A stock (“Letter Agreement”). Pursuant to the Letter Agreement, if Investor 1 had not nominated a candidate for appointment to the board by January 1, 2026, then Investor 1 would lose its right to do so. Investor 1 did nominate a candidate for appointment to the board pursuant to the Letter Agreement, which candidate was appointed to the board in February 2024, but Investor 1 has no continuing right to appoint another board member in the event that the current board member appointed by Investor 1 resigns. Company A and Investor 1 are in talks now to appoint another partner of Investor 1 to Company A’s board, but if that does happen, it is because Company A’s board chooses to do so and not pursuant to any contractual arrangement.
We do not consider this arrangement to be one where Investor 1 has the right to “serve as, appoint, veto, or approve board members” of Company A because Investor 1’s right to nominate a candidate for appointment to the board under the Letter Agreement has terminated and Investor 1 has no future rights to do so. Can you please confirm you agree?
Sheinberg, Samuel I. From: Larson, Peter Sent: Friday, February 21, 2025 10:17 AM To: Sheinberq, Samuel I. Subject: FW: Se lect 801 .30 Transactions From: Larson, Peter Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2025 2:12 PM To: Cc: HSRRu l eRe view Subject: RE : Se lect 801.30 Transactions Th is is not a se lect 801.30, see 16 CFR Part 803, Appendix B. Best, Peter Peter Larson From: HSRRu leRe view Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2025 12:38 PM To: Larson, Peter Subject: FW: Se lect 801.30 Transactions From: Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2025 9:10 PM To: HSRRu leRe view Subject: Se lect 801.30 Transactions Dear PNO: I wri te to confirm w hether a transaction qualifies as a " Se lect 801.30 transaction " under the new HSR rul es . The defin it ion of a Se lect 801.30 Transaction i s: A transacti on to which § 801.30 applies and where (1) the acquisit ion w ou ld not confer contro l, (2) there is no agreement ( or contemp lated agreement) bet w een an y ent ity wi th in the acquiring person and an y ent ity wi th in the acquired person gov ern ing any aspect of the transaction , and (3) the acquiring person does not have, and will not obta in, the ri ght to serve a s, appoi nt, v eto, or approve board members, or members of an y simil ar bod y, of an y ent ity wi th in the acquired person or the general partner or management company of an y ent it y wi th in the acquired person. 1
■ Company A received 801.30 notice from Investor 1 that Investor 1 intends to acquire additional voting securities that will exceed the next filing threshold in 16 CFR 801.1(h) (the “Acquisition”). Section 801.30 does apply to the Acquisition. There is no agreement or contemplated agreement between Investor 1 and Company A that governs any aspect of the Acquisition. Investor 1 will not acquire control of Company A as a result of the Acquisition. With respect to subpart (3) of the definition of Select 801.30 T ransactions, a representative of Investor 1 does currently sit on Company A’s board. This board appointment occurred as a result of a December 2023 letter agreement entered into between Company A and Investor 1 in connection with Investor 1’s acquisition of pre-funded warrants to purchase Company A stock (“Letter Agreement”). Pursuant to the Letter Agreement, if Investor 1 had not nominated a candidate for appointment to the board by January 1, 2026, then Investor 1 would lose its right to do so. Investor 1 did nominate a candidate for appointment to the board pursuant to the Letter Agreement, which candidate was appointed to the board in February 2024, but Investor 1 has no continuing right to appoint another board member in the event that the current board member appointed by Investor 1 resigns. Company A and Investor 1 are in talks now to appoint another partner of Investor 1 to Company A’s board, but if that does happen, it is because Company A’s board chooses to do so and not pursuant to any contractual arrangement. We do not consider this arrangement to be one where Investor 1 has the right to “serve as, appoint, veto, or approve board members” of Company A because Investor 1’s right to nominate a candidate for appointment to the board under the Letter Agreement has terminated and Investor 1 has no future rights to do so. Can you please confirm you agree? Thank you. 2
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.