8510006 Informal Interpretation

us-ftc-hsr-informal-interpretations-5bf8db73381a0190fb4b0928fdac25338510006 Informal InterpretationGuidance

Date
Rule
802.30; 7A(c)(10)
Staff
Patrick Sharpe
Response/Comments
See below

Question

(redacted)

October 14, 1985

Patrick Sharpe, Esq.
Room 301
Premerger Notification Office
Federal Trade Commission
6th and Pennsylvania Ave., N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20580

Dear Mr. Sharpe:

This will confirm the advice which I received from you by telephone in October 9, 1985 with respect to the applicability or inapplicability of the premerger notification requirements of the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act (the Act) to the following hypothetical situation:

Company B is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Company A. Company B owns voting securities of XYZ Corporation. Company A proposes to create another wholly-owned subsidiary, Company C, and transfer the XYZ Corporation voting securities from Company B to Company C.

Based on the foregoing facts, you concluded that the intra-person exemption, 16 C.F.R. 802.30, was not applicable because the acquiring and acquired person are not the same person. You also informed me, however, that the transfer of the voting securities would not be considered an acquisition under the Act in part because Company A owned the same amount of XYZ voting securities both before and after the transfer. Accordingly, you informed me that a Notification and Report Form under the Act would not be required for the transaction.

If I do not hear from you to the contrary, I will assume the foregoing accurately describes your advice upon which we will rely.

Thank you very much for your assistance in this matter.

Sincerely,

(redacted)

(redacted)

STAFF COMMENTS: I concur with this. P.S.


Complete printed PDF page 1

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.