8602006 Informal Interpretation

us-ftc-hsr-informal-interpretations-5c21167cd8e19b2f46941a818e2245418602006 Informal InterpretationGuidance

Date
Rule
802.1
Staff
Andrew Scanlon
Response/Comments
See below

Question

(redacted)

February 14, 1986

VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS

Mr. Andrew Scanlon
Compliance Specialist
Federal Trade Commission -
Pre-Merger Notification Office
Room 301
6th Street & Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20580

Re: (redacted) Limited/Exemption from Hart-Scott-Rodino
Pre-Merger Notification Requirements

Dear Mr. Scanlon:

Responsive to our telephone conversation of Friday, February 14, we are pleased to supplement our letter of February 11, 1986 with the following information:

1. The seven manufacturing warehouse projects located in the States of California, Tennessee, Indiana, Illinois, Maryland and Missouri are occupied by either (redacted) utilize the warehouse properties for the operation of their respective businesses. The only relationship between the Partnership and these warehouse projects will be that of a lessor of real property.

2. Upon completion of the Exchange Transaction, the Partnership (like its predecessors-in-interest) will not be engaged in any manufacturing business nor the operation of any warehouse business.

We understand that unless we hear from you to the contrary after you receipt of this letter, the Partnership may proceed with the Exchange Transaction without any obligation of any kind to file a pre-merger notification under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act.

We greatly appreciate your expeditious consideration of this matter.

Yours very truly,

(redacted)

(redacted)

NO STAFF COMMENTS


Complete printed PDF page 1

Complete printed PDF page 2

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.