9012007 Informal Interpretation

us-ftc-hsr-informal-interpretations-675bc136983e58ecad8f083917b53cb79012007 Informal InterpretationGuidance

Date
Rule
801.1(b)
Staff
Patrick Sharpe
File Number
9012007
Response/Comments
I concur, called 12/12/90

Question

(redacted)


Premerger Notification Office
Bureau of Competition
Federal Trade Commission
600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Room 303
Washington, D.C. 20580

Re:Voting Agreement/Control

Dear Patrick :

This confirms our conversation this morning regarding calculating control. After your consultation with Dick Smith and John Sipple, the Federal Trade Commissions staff has concluded that where a shareholders voting agreement give irrevocable proxies to two individuals, the number of voting securities represented by the proxies are not aggregated with either of the individuals shareholdings to determine the number or percentage of voting securities held by that individual. Moreover, the voting securities represented by the proxies are also not aggregated to either of the individuals shareholdings for purposes of determining whether the individuals have the contractual power to designate 50% or more of the directors of a corporation.


In our situation, each of the individuals hold between 14% to 15% of the voting securities of the corporation and since no other individual or entity holds 50% or more of the voting securities of the corporation or has the contractual power to designate 50% or more of the directors of the corporation, the corporation itself will be its own ultimate parent entity.


Very truly yours




cc: (redacted)


Complete printed PDF page 1

Complete printed PDF page 2

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.