File
Original Image File (109.71 KB)
8609010 Informal Interpretation
us-ftc-hsr-informal-interpretations-7ca805a21bab16300c41d5af3c8f3e158609010 Informal InterpretationGuidance
Date
Rule
7A
Response/Comments
Letter is incorrect. I cannot bind the Commission. I merely advised (redacted) that we advise that no filing is necessary. We refers to the premerger office, and the FTC and Dept. of Justice are not bound by such advice. I so notified (redacted) on 9/29/86.
Question
(redacted)
September 29, 1986
VIA HAND DELIVERY
Wayne Kaplan, Esq.
Pre-Merger Notification Office
Federal Trade Commission
6th Street and Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20580
Dear Mr. Kaplan:
This is to confirm our telephone conversation of today in which you informed me that the Federal Trade Commission will not challenge as violative of the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, 15 U.S.C. 18a, transactions involving the affiliation of an Alaska Native Corporation in accordance with section 60(b)(5) of the Deficit Reduction Act of 1984 and section 1804(e) of the Tax Reform Act of 1986 which are consummated without providing the notification required under the Act.
Sincerely,
(redacted)
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.