us-ftc-hsr-informal-interpretations-9ef070905305d3a168f1fec5b679791b•2506002 Informal Interpretation
2506002 Informal Interpretation
us-ftc-hsr-informal-interpretations-9ef070905305d3a168f1fec5b679791b2506002 Informal InterpretationGuidance
What you propose for the affidavit is acceptable. If the letter of intent itself provides sufficient detail about the scope of the entire transaction, it is also acceptable to reference it alone (without the transaction diagram) in the affidavit.
Question
A client plans to submit an HSR filing for a transaction, which will be filed based on an executed letter of intent. The letter of intent is fairly fulsome; however, as the parties have negotiated the transaction they have also prepared a “transaction diagram” that provides additional details about the structure of the transaction. The buyer will be submitting the transaction diagram with its filing. The transaction diagram is a “dated document,” in that it reflects a specific date; however, the transaction diagram has not been separately executed by the parties.
My question is how we should handle this in the Affidavit. My thought was for the Affidavit to say something along the lines of “A Letter of Intent has been executed, pursuant to which ‘A’ will acquire 100% of the assets of ‘B.’ The Letter of Intent, in conjunction with the transaction diagram that is attached as Exhibit C-01, provides sufficient detail about the scope of the entire transaction that the parties intend to consummate.”
Does this work, or would you prefer that we handle this a different way?
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.