us-ftc-hsr-informal-interpretations-b4c6b3c28fbdab91e32e60f60658d962•1111003 Informal Interpretation
1111003 Informal Interpretation
us-ftc-hsr-informal-interpretations-b4c6b3c28fbdab91e32e60f60658d9621111003 Informal InterpretationGuidance
Question
From:
(Redacted)
Sent:
Thursday, November 03, 2011 4:13 PM
To:
Verne, B. Michael
Subject:
Item 6(b)
Mike-
I'm work on an HSR for anacquired person. Two entities hold at least 5% of the shares of the acquiredentity. One holds 49% directly and the other holds 9% directly. However, theone that holds a direct 49% interest controls the one that holds 9%. I realizethat the 49% holder is the UPE since it "holds" 58%, but my questionis, in Item 6(b), do I list both the 49% holder and the 9% holder? If yes, do Ishow the 49% holder at 58% and footnote it to clarify the double counting? Ordo I only show the UPE, and show it at 58%, since "hold" meansdirectly or indirectly.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.