us-ftc-hsr-informal-interpretations-bfeb6e8558a7581aa6e8b23adcf0b1e4•1011010 Informal Interpretation
1011010 Informal Interpretation
us-ftc-hsr-informal-interpretations-bfeb6e8558a7581aa6e8b23adcf0b1e41011010 Informal InterpretationGuidance
Question
From: (Redacted)
Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 20102:43 PM
To: Verne,B. Michael
Subject: Filing Question
Michael,
I think I spoke to you earlier about thefollowing transaction, all parts of which are closing contemporaneously:
1.A forms C, a limited liability company,and contributes to it $55M in capital.
2.S, B's sole shareholder, sells 80% ofthe stock of B to C for $55M.
3.S sells the balance of the stock of B toC for a 20% interest in C.
4.A has total assets or annual net salesof > $126.9M
5.B has annual net sales of > $126.9Mand total assets of > $12.7M.
You suggested that I can view thetransaction as the formation of C by A, which is an exempt transaction,followed by the purchase of B's stock by C. You then stated that the purchaseprice is $55M. Why wouldn't the 20% interest in C also be considered part ofthe purchase price?
If the 20% interest in C that S acquiresis included in determining the Size of Transaction, I'm stumbling on how tovalue it. C's sole asset before the transaction is the $55M in cash paid to S, andafter the transaction is the stock of B. Would the 20% interest in C be valuedin relation to the price being paid for B? If so, I think its value =.2($55M/.8) = $13.75. If added to the $55M cash purchase price, the value ofB's stock held by C as a result of the transaction would be $68.75, exceedingthe $63.4M Size of Transaction Test.
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.