us-ftc-hsr-informal-interpretations-c703a41fe104a52c1f69e2257a463a40•0205012 Informal Interpretation
0205012 Informal Interpretation
us-ftc-hsr-informal-interpretations-c703a41fe104a52c1f69e2257a463a400205012 Informal InterpretationGuidance
Question
From: (redacted)
To: Mike Verne mverne@ftc.gov
Date: 5/16/02 12:06 PM
Subject: HSR Question
Hello Mike. I know that the PNO has made certain changes to eliminate filings that have no potential substantive issue (e.g., elimination of the primary filing where a person acquires 100% of the voting securities of a corporation that owns nothing other than a minority interest in another corporation or partnership). I am wondering if any changes have been made with respect to interperson transactions.
Here's the scenario:
Company A and Company B each own 50% of Partnership C. Company A and a subsidiary partnership of Partnership C (the "partnership") will exchange certain assets. When the exchange is complete, Company A will not hold any new assets. It will hold directly assets that it previously held through Partnership C and will hold through Partnership C assets that it previously held directly. Company B no longer will have an interest in the assets transferred to Company A. Company B will have a new interest in the assets transferred by Company A to the partnership. All jurisdictional tests are satisfied.
In the "old HSR world," Company A would have to file as an acquiring and acquired person for its acquisition of assets from itself and from Company B (i.e., for the acquisition of the assets transferred to it from the partnership and for the acquisition of the assets that it transfers to the partnership). Company B would have to file for its acquisition of the assets transferred by Company A to the partnership. Is the "new HSR world" any more forgiving?
Best regards,
(redacted)
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.