0010006 Informal Interpretation

us-ftc-hsr-informal-interpretations-c970b02f9259fd8ffab43be6711528900010006 Informal InterpretationGuidance

Date
Rule
801.2
Staff
Michael Verne
Response/Comments
As a result of the consolidation C would be attributed the assets/revenue of A & B and would be a $100 MM person. $10 MM shareholders of A & B would have potential filing obligation.

Question

From: [redacted]

To: mverne@

Date: Mon, Oct 9, 2000 11:31 AM

Subject: HSR interpretation

HI Mike - I would appreciate your guidance on the following fact pattern:

Facts: A and B wish to engage in a business combination. A will be merged with and into B and shareholders of A and B will be ginven shares of C - the consolidated entity. Neither A nor B are $100 million persons, But C will have in excess of $100 after the consolidation. Issue: I believe there would be no filing obligation for the consolidation as there is no $100 person. Assuming however, that shareholders of A and B are $10 million persons, and the investment only exemption is not available, would shareholders of A and or B have a filing obligation in their acquisition of shares of C?

Thanks,

[redacted]

NOTICE TO RECIPIENT: THIS E-MAIL IS MEANT FOR ONLY THE INTENDED RECIPIENT OF THE TRANSMISSION, AND MAY BE A COMMUNICATION PRIVILEGED BY LAW. IF YOU RECEIVED THIS E-MAIL IN ERROR, ANY REVIEW, USE, DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION, OR COPYING OF THIS E-MAIL IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY OF THE ERROR BY RETURN E-MAIL AND PLEASE DELETE THIS MESSAGE FORM YOUR SYSTEM. THANK YOU IN ADVANCE FOR YOUR COOPERATION.

cc: [redacted]


Complete printed PDF page 1

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.