1608004 Informal Interpretation

us-ftc-hsr-informal-interpretations-d38f8673644d52b950f6c0b3fe257c5a1608004 Informal InterpretationGuidance

Date

Tags:

Rule
801.2; 801.40
Staff
Karen Berg
Response/Comments

We would view this as a formation; A and B are not disappearing as a result, nor are they becoming subsidiaries of a new parent entity. See Interpretation 211 in the PNPM for discussion of consolidations.

Question

[REDACTED]

We would view this as a formation; A and B are not disappearing as a result, nor are they becoming subsidiaries of a new parent entity. See Interpretation 211 in the PNPM for discussion of consolidations.

Karen

From: [REDACTED]
Sent: Monday, August 22, 2016 2:05 PM
To: Walsh, Kathryn E.; Berg, Karen E.; Shaffer, Kristin; Storm, Evan; Gillis, Diana L.; Carson, Timothy
Cc: [REDACTED]
Subject: Informal Advice: Formation or Consolidation?

Under the following circumstances, please confirm our understanding that the transaction would be treated as a formation under 801.50, requiring a filing by A’s UPE as the Acquiring Person, with no Acquired Person filing, rather than a “consolidation.”

A and PE Co X and PE Co Y intend to create NewCo LLC. A’s wholly-owned subsidiary, A Holdings, Inc., will contribute its three wholly-owned subsidiaries, A1, A2, and A3, to NewCo. B’s shareholders, PE Co X, PE Co Y and management, will direct B to contribute its wholly-owned subsidiary, B1 LLC, to NewCo. There will be a cash distribution to A and/or B. After the transaction, A will hold a 55% interest in NewCo LLC and B will hold a 45% interest in NewCo LLC. Newco LLC will consist of A1, A2, A3, and B1.

B is its own UPE, while A’s UPE is a limited partnership.

As a general proposition, are there any factors that distinguish a consolidation from a formation?

Thank you,

[REDACTED]

From: Berg, Karen E.
Sent: Monday, August 22, 2016 2:32 PM
To: 	Walsh, Kathryn E.; Shaffer, Kristin; Storm, Evan; Gillis, Diana L.; Carson, Timothy
Cc:
Subject: RE: Informal Advice: Formation or Consolidation?
We would view this as a formation; A and B are not disappearing as a result, nor are they becoming
subsidiaries of a new parent entity. See Interpretation 211 in the PNPM for discussion of
consolidations.
Karen
From:
Sent: Monday, August 22, 2016 2:05 PM
To: Walsh, Kathryn E.; Berg, Karen E.; Shaffer, Kristin; Storm, Evan; Gillis, Diana L.; Carson, Timothy
Cc:
Subject: Informal Advice: Formation or Consolidation?
Under the following circumstances, please confirm our understanding that the transaction would be
treated as a formation under 801.50, requiring a filing by A’s UPE as the Acquiring Person, with no
Acquired Person filing, rather than a “consolidation.”
A and PE Co X and PE Co Y intend to create NewCo LLC. A’s wholly-owned subsidiary, A Holdings,
Inc., will contribute its three wholly-owned subsidiaries, A1, A2, and A3, to NewCo. B’s shareholders,
PE Co X, PE Co Y and management, will direct B to contribute its wholly-owned subsidiary, B1 LLC, to
NewCo. There will be a cash distribution to A and/or B. After the transaction, A will hold a 55%
interest in NewCo LLC and B will hold a 45% interest in NewCo LLC. Newco LLC will consist of A1, A2,
A3, and B1.
B is its own UPE, while A’s UPE is a limited partnership.
As a general proposition, are there any factors that distinguish a consolidation from a formation?
Thank you,
Complete printed PDF page 1

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.