us-ftc-hsr-informal-interpretations-ead7c9da3655e54f8bb0faa8852aed64•8611003 Informal Interpretation
8611003 Informal Interpretation
us-ftc-hsr-informal-interpretations-ead7c9da3655e54f8bb0faa8852aed648611003 Informal InterpretationGuidance
Question
(redacted)
November 4, 1986
Mr. Patrick Sharpe
Premerger Notification Office
Bureau of Competition
Room 303
6th Street & Pennsylvania Ave., N.W.
Federal Trade Commission
Washington, D.C. 20580
Re: (redacted)
Dear Mr. Sharpe:
This letter is to confirm our telephone conversation of November 3, 1986 in which you informed (redacted) and me that it is the Federal Trade Commissions position that partnerships are their own ultimate parent entities and, therefore, the assets and income of the partners are not considered in determining whether a filing is required under Title II of the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976 (the Act).
*Premerger Office position
In the transaction in question, the assets of (redacted) will be purchased by a limited partnership. The limited partnership will not be 100% owned by or attributable to any one individual. The assets of the limited partnership will be less than $10,000,000. Therefore, the acquiring entity will not meet the minimum size requirements of the Act, and a filing under the Act will not be necessary.
If our understanding of the FTCs position that only the assets of the partnership, and not those of the partners, are taken into account in determining the size of the acquiring person for purpose of the Act is not correct, we would appreciate it if you would notify us immediately.
Your assistance in this matter is greatly appreciated.
Very truly yours,
(redacted)
(redacted)
cc: (redacted)
(redacted)
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.