us-irs-notices-irb-2012-31-pdf•Internal Revenue Bulletin 2012-31 (PDF rendition): IRS Notices
Internal Revenue Bulletin 2012-31 (PDF rendition): IRS Notices
us-irs-notices-irb-2012-31-pdfInternal Revenue Bulletin 2012-31 (PDF rendition): IRS NoticesGuidance
Preserve advance releases and the authoritative Internal Revenue Bulletin rendition; directory timestamps are file-publication metadata, not legal effective dates. HTML bulletins begin June 2003; earlier available issues require full PDF parsing. Whole bulletin rendition: numbered items are identified below; other legal material and publisher context remain included. This is not a new standalone advance release.
Bulletin No. 201 2-31 July 30, 2012 HIGHLIGHTS OF THIS ISSUE These synopses are intended only as aids to the reader in identifying the subject matter covered. They may not be relied upon as authoritative interpretations. INCOME TAX Notice 2012–39, page 95. This notice provides guidance under section 367(d) of the Code addressing transactions that raise significant policy concerns involving transfers of intangible property by a domestic corpo- ration to a foreign corporation in certain corporate reorganiza- tions. Notice 2012–48, page 102. This notice solicits applications for the allocation of available amounts of national bond issuance authority limitation (volume cap) for Tribal Economic Development Bonds under section 7871(f) of the Code. The notice provides guidance on: (1) the application requirements and forms for requests for volume cap allocations, (2) the general process that will be used by the IRS to allocate the volume cap, and (3) information reporting to the IRS concerning various aspects of the allocation process and the issuance of Tribal Economic Development Bonds pur- suant to an allocation of volume cap. Notice 2012–49, page 119. 2012 section 43 inflation adjustment.This notice an- nounces the inflation adjustment factor and phase-out amount for the enhanced oil recovery credit for taxable years begin- ning in the 2012 calendar year. The format of the notice is identical to the format of previously published notices on this issue. The notice concludes that because the reference price for the 2011 calendar year ($95.73) exceeds $28 multiplied by the inflation adjustment factor for the 2011 calendar year ($43.92) by $51.81, the enhanced oil recovery credit for qual- ified costs paid or incurred in 2012 is phased out completely. The notice also contains the previously published figures for taxable years beginning in the 1991 through 2011 calendar years. Notice 2012–50, page 121. 2012 marginal production rates.This notice announces that under section 613A(c)(6)(C) of the Code, the applicable percentage for purposes of determining percentage depletion on marginal properties for calendar year 2012 is 15 percent. The format of the notice is identical to the format of notices previously published on this issue. EMPLOYEE PLANS Notice 2012–47, page 98. Weighted average interest rate update; corporate bond indices; 30-year Treasury securities; segment rates. This notice contains updates for the corporate bond weighted average interest rate for plan years beginning in July 2012; the 24-month average segment rates; the funding transitional segment rates applicable for July 2012; and the minimum present value transitional rates for June 2012. However, the notice does not reflect changes to segment rates required under the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21). Fi nding Lists begin on page ii. Index for July begins on page iv. The IRS Mission Provide Americ a’s taxpayers top-quality service by helping them understa nd and meet their tax responsibilities and en- force the law wi th integrity and fairness to all. Introduction The Internal Revenue Bulletin is the authoritative instrument of the Commissioner of Internal Revenue for announcing official rulings and procedures of the Internal Revenue Service and for publishing Treasury Decisions, Executive Orders, Tax Conven- tions, legislation, court decisions, and other items of general interest. It is published weekly and may be obtained from the Superintendent of Documents on a subscription basis. Bulletin contents are compiled semiannually into Cumulative Bulletins, which are sold on a single-copy basis. It is the policy of the Service to publish in the Bulletin all sub- stantive rulings necessary to promote a uniform application of the tax laws, including all rulings that supersede, revoke, mod- ify, or amend any of those previously published in the Bulletin. All published rulings apply retroactively unless otherwise indi- cated. Procedures relating solely to matters of internal man- agement are not published; however, statements of internal practices and procedures that affect the rights and duties of taxpayers are published. Revenue rulings represent the conclusions of the Service on the application of the law to the pivotal facts stated in the revenue ruling. In those based on positions taken in rulings to taxpayers or technical advice to Service field offices, identifying details and information of a confidential nature are deleted to prevent unwarranted invasions of privacy and to comply with statutory requirements. Rulings and procedures reported in the Bulletin do not have the force and effect of Treasury Department Regulations, but they may be used as precedents. Unpublished rulings will not be relied on, used, or cited as precedents by Service personnel in the disposition of other cases. In applying published rulings and procedures, the effect of subsequent legislation, regulations, court decisions, rulings, and procedures must be considered, and Service personnel and others concerned are cautioned against reaching the same conclusions in other cases unless the facts and circumstances are substantially the same. The Bulletin is divided into four parts as follows: Part I.—19 86 Code. This part i ncludes rulings and decisions based on provisions of the Intern al Revenue Code of 1986. Part II.—Treaties and Tax Legislation. This part is divided into two subparts as follows: Subpart A, Tax Conventions and Other Related Items, and Subpart B, Leg- islation and Related Committee Reports. Part III.—Administrative, Procedural, and Miscellaneous. To the extent practicable, pertinent cross references to these subjects are contained in the other Parts and Subparts. Also included in this part are Bank Secrecy Act Administrative Rul- ings. Bank Secrecy Act Administrative Rulings are issued by the Department of the Treasury’s Office of the Assistant Secre- tary (Enforcement). Part IV .—Items of General Interest. This par t includes notices of proposed rulemakings, disbar- ment an d suspension lists, and announcements. The last Bulletin for each month includes a cumulative index for the matters published during the preceding months. These monthly indexes are cumulated on a semiannual basis, and are published in the last Bulletin of each semiannual period. The c ontents of this publication are not copyrighted and may be reprinted freely. A citation of the Internal Revenue Bulletin as the source would be appropriate. For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S.Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402. July 30, 20122012–31 I.R.B. Part III. Administrative, Procedural, and Miscellaneous Regulations Under Section 367(d) Applicable to Certain Outbound Asset Reorganizations Notice 2012–39 SECTION 1. OVERVIEW This notice provides guidance under section 367(d) of the Internal Revenue Code (Code). The guidance addresses transactions that raise significant policy concerns involving certain transfers of intangible property by a domestic cor- poration to a foreign corporation in an exchange described in section 361(a) or (b) (section 361 exchange). The Internal Rev- enue Service (IRS) and the Department of the Treasury (Treasury Department) will issue regulations that incorporate the guidance described in this notice. The reg- ulations will apply to transfers occurring on or after July 13, 2012. SECTION 2. BACKGROUND Subject to certain exceptions, section 367(a) generally applies to the transfer of property by a United States person to a foreign corporation in an exchange de- scribed in section 332, 351, 354, 356, or 361. Section 367(d)(1) provides that, ex- cept as provided in regulations, if a United States person transfers any intangible property (within the meaning of section 936(h)(3)(B)) to a foreign corporation in an exchange described in section 351 or 361, section 367(d) (and not section 367(a)) applies to such transfer. Accord- ingly, income or gain attributable to the transfer of property by a U.S. person to a foreign corporation in an exchange de- scribed in section 351 or 361 is taken into account either in accordance with section 367(d)(2)(A)(ii)(I) or (II) (as described be- low), or in accordance with section 367(a). Section 367(d)(2)(A) provides that the United States person transferring the in- tangible property is treated as having sold the property in exchange for payments that are contingent upon the productivity, use, or disposition of such property. The transferor is treated as receiving amounts that reasonably reflect the amounts that would have been received: (1) annu- ally in the form of such payments over the useful life of such property (section 367(d)(2)(A)(ii)(I)), or (2) in the case of a disposition of the intangible property following such transfer (whether direct or indirect), at the time of the disposi- tion (section 367(d)(2)(A)(ii)(II)). For this purpose, an indirect disposition of the in- tangible property following the transfer includes a disposition of the transferor’s interest in the transferee corporation. S. Rep. No. 169, 98th Cong., 2d Sess., at 367 (1984). The amounts taken into account under section 367(d)(2)(A)(ii) must be commensurate with the income attributable to the intangible. Section 367(d)(2)(A) (flush language). Section 367(d)(2)(B) provides that for purposes of chapter 1 of the Code the earn- ings and profits of a foreign corporation to which the intangible property was trans- ferred are reduced by the amount required to be included in the income of the trans- feror of the intangible property. Section 367(d)(2)(C) provides that for purposes of chapter 1 of the Code any amount in- cluded in gross income pursuant to section 367(d) is treated as ordinary income. For purposes of applying section 904(d), any amount included in income under section 367(d) is treated in the same manner as if such amount were a royalty. Section 367(d)(2)(C). Section 1.367(d)–1T(c)(1) provides that if a U.S. person transfers intangible property that is subject to section 367(d) to a foreign corporation (transferee foreign corporation) in an exchange described in section 351 or 361, then such person is treated as having transferred that property in exchange for annual payments con- tingent on the productivity or use of the property. The regulation further provides that such person shall, over the useful life of the property, annually include in gross income an amount that represents an appropriate arm’s-length charge for the use of the property. §1.367(d)–1T(c)(1). For this purpose, the appropriate charge is determined under section 482 and the regulations thereunder.Id. Section 1.367(d)–1T(d)(1) provides rules that apply when a U.S. person trans- fers intangible property that is subject to section 367(d) to a transferee foreign cor- poration in an exchange described in sec- tion 351 or 361 and, within the useful life of the intangible property, that U.S. trans- feror subsequently disposes of the stock of the transferee foreign corporation to a per- son that is not a related person (within the meaning of §1.367(d)–1T(h)). The rules generally provide that the U.S. transferor is treated as having simultaneously sold the intangible property to the unrelated person acquiring the stock of the transferee foreign corporation. §1.367(d)–1T(d)(1). The U.S. transferor recognizes gain (but not loss) in an amount equal to the differ- ence between the fair market value of the transferred intangible property on the date of the subsequent disposition and the U.S. transferor’s former adjusted basis in that property.Id. Section 1.367(d)–1T(e)(1) provides rules that apply when a U.S. person trans- fers intangible property that is subject to section 367(d) to atransferee foreign corporation in an exchange described in section 351 or 361 and, within the useful life of the transferred intangible property, the U.S. transferor subsequently transfers the stock of the transferee foreign cor- poration to U.S. persons that are related to the transferor (within the meaning of §1.367(d)–1T(h)). These rules generally provide, in part, that the related U.S. per- sons, over the useful life of the property, annually include in gross income a pro- portionate share of the contingent annual payments that would otherwise be deemed to be received by the U.S. transferor under §1.367(d)–1T(c). §1.367(d)–1T(e)(1). Section 1.367(d)–1T(g)(1)(i) provides that if a U.S. person is required to recog- nize income under certain provisions of the regulations under section 367(d), in- cluding §1.367(d)–1T(c), and the amount deemed to be received is not actually paid by the transferee foreign corporation, then the U.S. person may establish an account receivable from the transferee foreign corporation equal to the amount deemed paid that was not actually paid. Such account receivable may be established and paid without further U.S. income tax consequences to the U.S. transferor or the transferee foreign corporation. §1.367(d)–1T(g)(1)(i). 2012–31 I.R.B.95July 30, 2012 SECTION 3. TRANSACTIONS AT ISSUE The IRS and the Treasury Department are aware that certain taxpayers are engag- ing in transactions intended to repatriate earnings from foreign corporations with- out the appropriate recognition of income. In one such transaction, USP, a domestic corporation, owns 100 percent of the stock of UST, a domestic corporation. USP’s basis in its UST stock equals its value of $100x. UST’s sole asset is a patent with a tax basis of zero. UST has no liabilities. USP also owns 100 percent of the stock of TFC, a foreign corporation. UST transfers the patent to TFC in exchange for $100x of cash and, in connection with the trans- fer, UST distributes the $100x of cash to USP and liquidates. The taxpayer takes the position that nei- ther USP nor UST recognizes gain or divi- dend income on the receipt of the $100x of cash. USP then applies the section 367(d) regulations to include amounts in gross in- come under §1.367(d)–1T(c)(1) in subse- quent years. USP also applies the 367(d) regulations to establish a receivable from TFC in the amount of USP’s aggregate income inclusion. USP takes the posi- tion that TFC’s repayment of the receiv- able does not give rise to income (notwith- standing the prior receipt of $100x in con- nection with the reorganization). Accord- ingly, under these positions, the transac- tions have resulted in a repatriation in ex- cess of $100x ($100x at the time of the re- organization and then through repayment of the receivable in the amount of USP’s income inclusions over time) while only recognizing income in the amount of the inclusions over time. The IRS and the Treasury Department understand that other transactions may be structured to have the same or similar ef- fect, including, for example, transactions that involve TFC’s assumption of liabili- ties of UST. Similar results may also be achieved in cases in which a controlled for- eign corporation uses deferred earnings to fund an acquisition of all or part of the stock of a domestic corporation from an unrelated party for cash, followed by an outbound asset reorganization of the do- mestic corporation to avoid an income in- clusion under section 956. The IRS and the Treasury Department believe that these transactions raise significant policy con- cerns, and accordingly, intend to revise the regulations under section 367(d) in the manner described in this notice. SECTION 4. REGULATIONS TO BE ISSUED .01 In General The IRS and the Treasury Depart- ment will issue regulations addressing the transfer by a domestic corporation (U.S. transferor) of section 367(d) property in a section 361 exchange to a transferee for- eign corporation (outbound section 367(d) transfer) that incorporate the rules de- scribed in this notice. The regulations will ensure that, with respect to all outbound section 367(d) transfers, the total income to be taken into account under section 367(d) is either included in income by the U.S. transferor in the year of the reorgani- zation or, where appropriate, over time by one or more qualified successors. Any in- come taken into account under this notice must be commensurate with the income attributable to the section 367(d) property transferred in the outbound section 367(d) transfer. Section 367(d)(2)(A) (flush lan- guage). Except as provided below, the rules described in this notice, rather than §1.367(d)–1T(c), (d), (e), and (g), will govern outbound section 367(d) transfers. For purposes of this notice, references to “stock received” include stock deemed received in a transaction. .02 U.S. Transferor Takes into Account Income under Section 367(d)(2)(A)(ii)(I) In an outbound section 367(d) transfer, the U.S. transferor will take into account income under section 367(d)(2)(A)(ii)(I) with respect to each qualified successor, if any, by treating as a prepayment of such income the product of the section 367(d) percentage multiplied by the sum of: (i) the money and fair market value of other property (within the meaning of section 356) received by the qualified successor in exchange for, or with respect to, stock of the U.S. transferor, reduced by the por- tion of any U.S. transferor distributions received by the qualified successor; and (ii) the product of the qualified successor’s ownership interest percentage multiplied by the amount of non-qualifying liabilities that are either assumed (within the mean- ing of section 357(d)) by the transferee for- eign corporation in the reorganization or satisfied by the U.S. transferor with money or other property (within the meaning of section 361) provided by the transferee for- eign corporation. As a prepayment of such income, the amount is included in income by the U.S. transferor in the year of the outbound section 367(d) transfer, regard- less of the productivity of the transferred section 367(d) property in the year of the transfer or in subsequent years. .03 U.S. Transferor Takes into Account Income under Section 367(d)(2)(A)(ii)(II) In an outbound section 367(d) trans- fer, the U.S. transferor will also take into account income under section 367(d)(2)(A)(ii)(II) in an amount equal to the product of: (i) the sum of the owner- ship interest percentages of all non-qual- ified successors, if any, multiplied by (ii) the amount of gain realized on all of the section 367(d) property transferred in the section 361 exchange. .04 Treatment of Qualified Successors Consistent with the principles of §1.367(d)–1T(e)(1)(ii) and (iii), except as provided in this paragraph 4.04, each qualified successor will take into account the income attributable to a proportion- ate share of the contingent annual pay- ments that the U.S. transferor would have been treated as receiving under section 367(d)(2)(A)(ii)(I) and §1.367(d)–1T(c) had the U.S. transferor remained in exis- tence and retained the qualified stock (or, in the case of certain distributions under section 355, had the U.S. transferor re- tained the qualified stock) received in the reorganization (assuming for this purpose that the transfer continues to qualify as an exchange described in section 361), and had the U.S. transferor not recognized any income under section 4 of this no- tice. A qualified successor’s proportionate share of such contingent annual payments is the product of the contingent annual payments multiplied by the qualified suc- cessor’s ownership interest percentage. The income attributable to a qualified successor’s proportionate share of the con- tingent annual payments is excluded from gross income to the extent of the income included by the U.S. transferor under sec- tion 4.02 of this notice that is attributable to the qualified successor (credit amount). July 30, 2012962012–31 I.R.B. A qualified successor may, in accor- dance with §1.367(d)–1T(g)(1), establish an account receivable for any contingent annual payments included in gross income by the qualified successor under this no- tice. Qualified successors are subject to the rules of §1.367(d)–1T, as modified by this paragraph 4.04. Thus, for example, if a qualified successor subsequently transfers qualified stock received in the reorganiza- tion to a U.S. person that is related (within the meaning of §1.367(d)–1T(h)) to the qualified successor, §1.367(d)–1T(e) will apply to such transfer. In this case, a pro- portionate amount ofany remaining credit amount attributable to the qualified suc- cessor can be taken into account by such related U.S. person in the same manner as it could have been taken into account by the qualified successor.Alternatively, for example, if a qualified successor subse- quently transfers qualified stock to a U.S. person that is unrelated to the qualified successor or to a person that is not a U.S. person, §1.367(d)–1T(d) will apply to such transfer. In this case, a proportionate amount of any remaining credit amount at- tributable to the qualified successor can be taken into account to reduce the amount of gain recognized under §1.367(d)–1T(d). .05 Definitions The following definitions apply for pur- poses of this notice: (1)Non-qualifying liabilities—(i)In general. Except as provided in paragraph (1)(ii) of this section 5, non-qualifying liabilities include all liabilities of the U.S. transferor other than a liability: (A) That was incurred in the ordinary course of the U.S. transferor’s active trade or business (within the meaning of section 367(a)(3)), if any, (B) That did not arise in connection with the reorganization, and (C) That is owed to an unrelated person. For this purpose, an unrelated person is any person that does not have a relationship to the U.S. transferor described in section 267(b) or 707(b) immediately before the reorganization. (ii)Increase for certain distributions. The amount of non-qualifying liabilities shall be increased (but not in excess of the U.S. transferor’s total liabilities) by an amount equal to the sum of the U.S. trans- feror distributions and any other distribu- tions made by the U.S.transferor (or any predecessor) with respect to its stock, in- cluding distributions in redemption of its stock, during the two-year period immedi- ately preceding the reorganization. (2)Ownership interest percentageis the ratio of the value of the stock in the U.S. transferor owned by a shareholder to the value of all of the outstanding stock of the U.S. transferor. Except as provided in this paragraph, the ownership interest percent- age of a shareholder is determined imme- diately before the reorganization. For pur- poses of determiningthe ownership inter- est percentage with respect to each share- holder, however, the numerator of the frac- tion is first reduced (but not below zero) by U.S. transferor distributions made to such shareholder, and the denominator is reduced by the total amount of U.S trans- feror distributions. (3)Propertyis defined in §1.367(a)–1T(d)(4).Section 367(d) prop- ertyis any property described in section 936(h)(3)(B).Section 367(a) propertyis any property other than section 367(d) property. (4)Qualified stockmeans stock in the transferee foreign corporation, including stock received in the transferee foreign corporation under section 354, 355, or 356 in exchange for, or with respect to, stock oftheU.S.transferor. (5)Qualified successormeans a share- holder of the U.S. transferor that is a do- mestic corporation, other than a regulated investment company (as defined in section 851(a)), a real estate investment trust (as defined in section 856(a)), or an S cor- poration (as defined in section 1361(a)), provided such shareholder receives quali- fied stock in the reorganization or imme- diately after the reorganization owns qual- ified stock other than qualified stock re- ceived in the reorganization. Anon-qual- ified successormeans a shareholder of the U.S. transferor other than a qualified suc- cessor. (6)Section 367(d) percentageis the ra- tio of the aggregate value of the section 367(d) property transferred by the U.S. transferor to the transferee foreign corpo- ration in the section 361 exchange to the aggregate value of all property (in other words, all section 367(a) property and sec- tion 367(d) property) transferred by the U.S. transferor to the transferee foreign corporation in the section 361 exchange. (7)U.S. transferor distributionsare any distributions by the U.S. transferor of money or other property (within the meaning of section 356) to shareholders pursuant to the plan of reorganization, but only to the extent such money or other property is not provided by the transferee foreign corporation in exchange for prop- erty of the U.S. transferor acquired in the section 361 exchange. .06 Other Rules Income taken into account under sec- tion 4.02 or 4.03 of this notice is treated as ordinary income and is treated, for pur- poses of applying section 904(d), in the same manner as if such amount were a roy- alty. For purposes of this notice, stock of the U.S. transferor held by a partnership (do- mestic or foreign) is treated as held pro- portionately by its partners. Thus, for ex- ample, if a partnership is a shareholder of the U.S. transferor and receives qualified stock in the reorganization, the partners in the partnership are treated as receiving the qualified stock for purposes of this no- tice, including for purposes of identifying a qualified successor. .07 Example The following example illustrates the rules and guidance provided in this notice. Example.(i)Facts. USP, a domestic corporation (that is not a regulated investment company, a real estate investment trust, or an S corporation), owns 100% of the outstanding stock of UST, a domestic corporation, and 100% of the outstanding stock of TFC, a foreign corporation. UST owns a patent with a tax basis of $0x and a value of $60x. UST also owns Asset A, which is section 367(a) property, with a value of $40x. UST has no liabilities. In a reorgani- zation described in section 368(a)(1)(D), UST trans- fers the patent and Asset A to TFC in exchange for $70x of TFC stock and $30x of cash. In connection with the transfer, UST distributes the $70x of TFC stock and $30x of cash to USP and liquidates. UST’s transfer of the patent and Asset A to TFC qualifies as a section 361 exchange. USP is treated as exchang- ing its UST stock for $70x of TFC stock and $30x of cash pursuant to section 356. (ii)Analysis. UST’s transfer of the patent to TFC in the section 361 exchange is an outbound section 367(d) transfer subject to section 367(d) and the regulations thereunder, as modified by this notice. Under section 4.02 of this notice, the income that UST will take into account as a prepayment is $18x, the product of the section 367(d) percentage (60%) multiplied by the amount of cash ($30x) received 2012–31 I.R.B.97July 30, 2012 by USP, a qualified successor. UST must include this amount in income regardless of whether income is being generated by the patent at the time of the outbound section 367(d) transfer. USP is a qualified successor because USP (a domestic corporation) is a shareholder of UST that receives qualified stock (newly issued stock of TFC) under section 356 in exchange for stock of UST. USP is also a qualified successor because USP (a domestic corporation) is a shareholder of UST that owns qualified stock (existing stock in TFC) other than the qualified stock received in the reorganization. Under section 4.05 of this notice, the section 367(d) percentage of 60% is computed as the $60x aggregate value of the sec- tion 367(d) property transferred in the section 361 exchange, divided by $100x aggregate value of all property transferred in the section 361 exchange. USP, as a qualified successor to UST, will take into account the income attributable to the contingent annual payments that UST would have received under §1.367(d)–1T(c) over the remaining useful life of the intangible property, determined as if UST had remained in existence and not taken into account the $18x of income. Under §1.367(d)–1T(c)(1), such contingent annual payments must be determined in accordance with section 482 and the regulations thereunder, and therefore must be consistent with the arm’s-length standard. The first $18x of contingent annual payments (if otherwise taken into account by USP under section 4.04 of this notice) are ex- cluded from USP’s gross income under section 4.04 of this notice, and any additional contingent annual payments are included in USP’s gross income. In accordance with §1.367(d)–1T(g)(1), USP may es- tablish an account receivable with respect to any contingent annual payments included in gross in- come by USP under this notice. For rules applicable to the transfer of Asset A, see section 367(a) and any regulations thereunder. SECTION 5. EFFECTIVE DATE The regulations described in this no- tice will apply to outbound section 367(d) transfers occurring on or after July 13, 2012. No inference is intended as to the treatment of transactions described in this notice under current law, and the IRS may challenge such transactions under applica- ble Code provisions or judicial doctrines. SECTION 6. COMMENTS The IRS and the Treasury Depart- ment request comments on the regulations to be issued under this notice. Specifi- cally, comments are requested regarding whether certain domestic corporations that are related to the U.S. transferor but not subject to section 4.04 of this notice (relating to qualifying successors) should nevertheless be subject to section 4.04. For example, the IRS and the Treasury Department are considering whether the rules described in section 4.04 of this no- tice should apply to transactions in which a domestic corporation is not a qualified successor because it indirectly owns the U.S. transferor through a controlled for- eign corporation. In addition, comments are requested as to the proper recovery of basis in the section 367(d) property trans- ferred. SECTION 7. DRAFTING INFORMATION The principal author of this no- tice is Robert B. Williams, Jr. of the Office of Associate Chief Counsel (International). However, other personnel from the IRS and the Treasury Department participated in its development. For further information regarding this notice, contact Robert B. Williams, Jr. at (202) 622–3860 (not a toll-free call). Update for Weighted Average Interest Rates, Yield Curves, and Segment Rates Notice 2012–47 This notice provides guidance as to the corporate bond weighted average interest rate and the permissible range of interest rates specified under § 412(b)(5)(B)(ii)(II) of the Internal Revenue Code as in ef- fect for plan years beginning before 2008. It also provides guidance on the cor- porate bond monthly yield curve (and the corresponding spot segment rates), and the 24-month average segment rates under § 430(h)(2). In addition, this no- tice provides guidance as to the interest rate on 30-year Treasury securities un- der § 417(e)(3)(A)(ii)(II) as in effect for plan years beginning before 2008, the 30-year Treasury weighted average rate under § 431(c)(6)(E)(ii)(I), and the min- imum present value segment rates under § 417(e)(3)(D) as in effect for plan years beginning after 2007. These rates do not reflect any changes implemented by the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP–21). MAP–21 provides that for purposes of section 430(h)(2), the segment rates are limited by the applicable maximum percentage or the applicable minimum percentage based on the average of segment rates over a 25 year period. Guidance related to the new legislation will be issued in the future. CORPORATE BOND WEIGHTED AVERAGE INTEREST RATE Sections412(b)(5)(B)(ii)and 412(l)(7)(C)(i), as amended by the Pen- sion Funding Equity Act of 2004 and by the Pension Protection Act of 2006 (PPA), provide that the interest rates used to cal- culate current liability and to determine the required contribution under § 412(l) for plan years beginning in 2004 through 2007 must be within a permissible range based on the weighted average of the rates of interest on amounts invested conser- vatively in long term investment grade corporate bonds during the 4-year period ending on the last day before the beginning of the plan year. Notice 2004–34, 2004–1 C.B. 848, pro- vides guidelines for determining the cor- porate bond weighted average interest rate and the resulting permissible range of in- terest rates used to calculate current liabil- ity. That notice establishes that the corpo- rate bond weighted average is based on the monthly composite corporate bond rate de- rived from designated corporate bond in- dices. The methodology for determining the monthly composite corporate bond rate as set forth in Notice 2004–34 continues to apply in determining that rate. See Notice 2006–75, 2006–2 C.B. 366. The composite corporate bond rate for June 2012 is 4.27 percent. Pursuant to No- tice 2004–34, the Service has determined this rate as the average of the monthly yields for the included corporate bond in- dices for that month. The following corporate bond weighted average interest rate was determined for July 30, 2012982012–31 I.R.B. plan years beginning in the month shown below. For Plan Years Beginning inPermissible Range MonthYear Corporate Bond Weighted Average90%to100% July2012 5.38 4.84 5.38 YIELD CURVE AND SEGMENT RATES Generally for plan years beginning after 2007 (except for delayed effective dates for certain plans under sections 104, 105, and 106 of PPA), § 430 of the Code specifies the minimum funding require- ments that apply to single employer plans pursuant to § 412. Section 430(h)(2) spec- ifies the interest rates that must be used to determine a plan’s target normal cost and funding target. Under this provision, present value is generally determined us- ing three 24-month average interest rates (“segment rates”), each of which applies to cash flows during specified periods. However, an election may be made under § 430(h)(2)(D)(ii) to use the monthly yield curve in place of the segment rates. Sec- tion 430(h)(2)G) set forth a transitional rule applicable to plan years beginning in 2008 and 2009 under which the segment rates were blended with the corporate bond weighted average described above, includ- ing an election under § 430(h)(2)(G)(iv) foranemployertousethesegmentrates without the transitional rule. Notice 2007–81, 2007–2 C.B. 899, provides guidelines for determining the monthly corporate bond yield curve, and the 24-month average corporate bond segment rates used to compute the tar- get normal cost and the funding target. Pursuant to Notice 2007–81, the monthly corporate bond yield curve derived from June 2012 data is in Table I at the end of this notice. The spot first, second, and third segment rates for the month of June 2012 are, respectively, 1.60, 3.97, and 4.93. The three 24-month average cor- porate bond segment rates applicable for July 2012 are as follows: First Segment Second Segment Third Segment 1.814.73 5.85 The transitional rule of § 430(h)(2)(G) does not apply to plan years beginning af- ter December 31, 2009. Therefore, for a plan year beginning after 2009 with a look- back month to July 2012, the funding seg- ment rates are the three 24-month average corporate bond segment rates applicable for July 2012, listed above without blend- ing for any transitional period. 30-YEAR TREASURY SECURITIES INTEREST RATES Section 417(e)(3)(A)(ii)(II) (prior to amendment by PPA) defines the appli- cable interest rate, which must be used for purposes of determining the minimum present value of a participant’s benefit under § 417(e)(1) and (2), as the annual rate of interest on 30-year Treasury se- curities for the month before the date of distribution or such other time as the Secretary may by regulations prescribe. Section 1.417(e)–1(d)(3) of the Income Tax Regulations provides that the applica- bleinterestrateforamonthistheannual rate of interest on 30-year Treasury secu- rities as specified by the Commissioner for that month in revenue rulings, notices or other guidance published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin. The rate of interest on 30-year Trea- sury securities for June 2012 is 2.70 per- cent. The Service has determined this rate as the average of the daily determinations of yield on the 30-year Treasury bond ma- turing in May 2042. Generally for plan years beginning after 2007, § 431 specifies the mini- mum funding requirements that apply to multiemployer plans pursuant to § 412. Section 431(c)(6)(B) specifies a minimum amount for the full-funding limitation described in section 431(c)(6)(A), based on the plan’s current liability. Section 431(c)(6)(E)(ii)(I) provides that the inter- est rate used to calculate current liability for this purpose must be no more than 5 percent above and no more than 10 percent below the weighted average of the rates of interest on 30-year Treasury securities dur- ing the four-year period ending on the last day before the beginning of the plan year. Notice 88–73, 1988–2 C.B. 383, provides guidelines for determining the weighted average interest rate. The following rates were determined for plan years beginning in the month shown below. For Plan Years Beginning inPermissible Range MonthYear 30-Year Treasury Weighted Average90%to105% July20123.833.444.02 2012–31 I.R.B.99July 30, 2012 MINIMUM PRESENT VALUE SEGMENT RATES Generally for plan years beginning af- ter December 31, 2007, the applicable in- terest rates under § 417(e)(3)(D) are seg- ment rates computed without regard to a 24-month average. For plan years begin- ning in 2008 through 2011, the applica- ble interest rates are the monthly spot seg- ment rates blended with the applicable rate under § 417(e)(3)(A)(ii)(II) as in effect for plan years beginning in 2007. Notice 2007–81 provides guidelines for determin- ing the minimum present value segment rates. Pursuant to that notice, the min- imum present value transitional segment rates determined for June 2012, taking into account the June 2012 30-year Treasury rate of 2.70 stated above, are as follows: For Plan Years Beginning in First Segment Second Segment Third Segment 20111.823.724.48 20121.603.974.93 DRAFTING INFORMATION The principal author of this notice is Tony Montanaro of the Employee Plans, Tax Exempt and Government Entities Division. Mr. Montanaro may be e-mailed atRetirementPlanQuestions@irs.gov. July 30, 20121002012–31 I.R.B. Table I Monthly Yield Curve for June 2012 Derived from June 2012 Data Maturity YieldMaturity YieldMaturity YieldMaturity YieldMaturity Yield 0.50.5320.5 4.68 40.5 4.96 60.55.0680.55.11 1.00.8721.0 4.69 41.0 4.96 61.0 5.06 81.0 5.11 1.51.1721.54.7141.5 4.97 61.55.0781.55.11 2.01.4322.04.7242.04.9762.0 5.07 82.0 5.12 2.5 1.63 22.5 4.73 42.5 4.97 62.55.0782.55.12 3.0 1.79 23.04.7443.0 4.98 63.0 5.07 83.0 5.12 3.5 1.93 23.54.7543.5 4.98 63.55.0783.55.12 4.02.0724.04.7644.0 4.98 64.0 5.07 84.0 5.12 4.52.2124.54.7744.5 4.99 64.55.0784.55.12 5.02.3525.0 4.78 45.0 4.99 65.05.0885.05.12 5.5 2.49 25.5 4.78 45.5 4.99 65.55.0885.55.12 6.02.6426.0 4.79 46.0 5.00 66.0 5.08 86.0 5.12 6.5 2.80 26.5 4.80 46.55.0066.55.0886.55.12 7.02.9527.04.8147.0 5.00 67.0 5.08 87.0 5.12 7.53.1027.54.8247.55.0167.55.0887.55.13 8.03.2428.04.8248.0 5.01 68.0 5.08 88.0 5.13 8.5 3.38 28.5 4.83 48.55.0168.5 5.09 88.55.13 9.0 3.51 29.0 4.84 49.0 5.01 69.0 5.09 89.0 5.13 9.53.6329.5 4.85 49.5 5.02 69.55.0989.5 5.13 10.03.7430.0 4.8550.05.02 70.05.09 90.0 5.13 10.53.8530.54.8650.55.0270.55.0990.55.13 11.03.9431.04.87 51.05.02 71.05.0991.0 5.13 11.5 4.03 31.5 4.87 51.55.0371.5 5.0991.5 5.13 12.04.1132.04.88 52.05.03 72.05.09 92.0 5.13 12.5 4.18 32.5 4.89 52.55.0372.55.10 92.5 5.13 13.0 4.25 33.0 4.89 53.05.03 73.0 5.10 93.0 5.13 13.54.3033.5 4.90 53.55.0473.55.1093.55.13 14.0 4.35 34.04.90 54.05.04 74.0 5.10 94.0 5.14 14.5 4.40 34.5 4.91 54.55.0474.55.10 94.5 5.14 15.0 4.44 35.0 4.91 55.05.0475.05.10 95.0 5.14 15.5 4.48 35.5 4.92 55.55.0475.55.10 95.5 5.14 16.0 4.51 36.0 4.92 56.05.05 76.0 5.10 96.0 5.14 16.54.5436.5 4.93 56.55.0576.55.1096.55.14 17.0 4.56 37.04.93 57.05.05 77.0 5.11 97.0 5.14 17.54.5837.5 4.94 57.55.0577.55.11 97.5 5.14 18.04.6038.0 4.94 58.05.05 78.0 5.11 98.0 5.14 18.5 4.62 38.5 4.94 58.55.0578.55.11 98.5 5.14 19.0 4.64 39.0 4.9559.0 5.06 79.0 5.11 99.0 5.14 19.54.6539.54.9559.55.0679.55.1199.55.14 20.04.6740.04.9660.0 5.06 80.0 5.11 100.0 5.14 2012–31 I.R.B.101July 30, 2012 Tribal Economic Development Bonds Notice 2012–48 SECTION 1. PURPOSE This notice solicits applications for allocations of the available amount of na- tional bond volume limitation authority (volume cap) for tribal economic devel- opment bonds (Tribal Economic Devel- opment Bonds). The available amount includes amounts that were previously allocated and subsequently forfeited un- der Notice 2009–51, 2009–28 I.R.B. 128 (July 13, 2009), Announcement 2010–88, 2010–47 I.R.B. 753 (November 22, 2010), and Announcement 2011–71, 2011–46 I.R.B. 770 (November 14, 2011). This notice also provides related guidance on the following: (1) application require- ments and forms for requests for volume cap allocations; and (2) the method that the Department of theTreasury (Treasury) and the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) will use to allocate the volume cap. SECTION 2. BACKGROUND Section 1402 of Title I of Division B of the American Recovery and Reinvest- ment Act of 2009, Pub. L. No. 111–5, 123 Stat. 115 (2009), added § 7871(f) to the Internal Revenue Code (Code). In general, the purpose of § 7871(f) is to give Indian tribal governments greater flexibility than is allowable under the existing standard of § 7871(c) through the issuance of Tribal Economic Development Bonds to finance economic development projects. Section 7871(f)(1) provides that the Secretary shall allocate the $2 billion volume cap among the Indian tribal governments in such man- ner as the Secretary,in consultation with the Secretary of the Interior, determines appropriate. In Notice 2009–51, the Treasury and the IRS solicited applications for alloca- tions of volume cap and addressed admin- istrative proceduresfor the initial alloca- tions of the $2 billion volume cap. On September 15, 2009, the IRS announced allocations in an aggregate amount of ap- proximately $1 billion of volume cap for the first allocation (2009 First Allocation) of authority to issue Tribal Economic De- velopment Bonds. On February 9, 2010, the IRS announced allocations in an ag- gregate amount of approximately $1 bil- lion of volume cap in the second alloca- tion (2010 Second Allocation) of author- ity to issue Tribal Economic Development Bonds. Section 7.f. of Notice 2009–51 pro- vides that if bonds were not issued by De- cember 31, 2010, for any or all of the al- location received by an Indian tribal gov- ernment from the 2009 First Allocation, or by December 31, 2011, for any or all of the allocation received by an Indian tribal government from the 2010 Second Alloca- tion, then any or all of such allocation not used to issue bonds would be treated as for- feited. In Announcement 2010–88, the IRS announced an automatic six-month exten- sion of the administrative deadline to issue bonds under bonding authority from the 2009 First Allocation from December 31, 2010, to June 30, 2011, and a process by which Indian tribal governments could receive an additionalsix-month extension of the administrative deadline to issue bonds under bonding authority from the 2009 First Allocation from June 30, 2011, to December 31, 2011. Section 3 of Announcement 2010–88 provides that an allocation received pursuant to the 2009 First Allocation shall be treated as forfeited if bonds are not issued by the applicable deadline. In Announcement 2011–71, the IRS notified eligible Indian tribal governments that they could request a three-month extension from December 31, 2011, to March 31, 2012, to issue Tribal Economic Development Bonds. Indian tribal governments eligible for such extension were (1) those that had received an allocation of volume cap from the 2009 First Allocation if an extension of the deadline to issue bonds from June 30, 2011, to December 31, 2011 had been granted pursuant to the process described in Announcement 2010–88, or (2) Indian tribal governments that had received an allocation from the 2010 Second Allocation. Section 4 of Announcement 2011–71 also provides that an allocation with respect to which the Indian tribal government received an extension pursuant to the process described in Announcement 2011–71 is treated as forfeited if bonds were not issued by March 31, 2012. Notice 2009–51, Announcement 2010–88, and Announcement 2011–71 provide that any allocation amounts treated as forfeited may be available for allocation by the IRS. Indian tribal gov- ernments have reported to the IRS the issuance of Tribal Economic Development Bonds in the amount of $197,153,357. Based on these reports and the passage of the deadlines described above for issuing Tribal Economic Development Bonds, the IRS has identified $1,802,846,643 of vol- ume cap that is available for reallocation. In Announcement 2011–71, and pur- suant to Executive Order 13175 on tribal consultation, the IRS announced that it was seeking public comment from Indian tribal governments and other interested mem- bers of the public on the reallocation of available volume cap in order to facilitate issuance of Tribal Economic Development Bonds by Indian tribal governments. Pur- suant to the Announcement and the Execu- tive Order, consultation sessions were held in person and by telephone with tribal or- ganizations. SECTION 3. GENERAL APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS Each application for an allocation of volume cap under § 7871(f)(1) submitted pursuant to this notice (Application) must be prepared and submitted in accordance with this section. By submitting an Ap- plication, the applicant agrees to comply with the requirements of this notice. For an Application to comply with this section, among other things, the Application must be prepared in substantially the same for- mat as the form attached to this notice as Appendix A. This notice, including Ap- pendix A, may be found electronically un- der the link “TEB Published Guidance” on the IRS web site athttp://www.irs.gov/tax- exemptbond/index.html. a.Qualified issuer. The Applica- tion must be submitted by an Indian tribal government (Applicant).See § 7701(a)(40)(A) of the Code and Revenue Procedure 2008–55, 2008–39 I.R.B. 768. The Application must identify the Appli- cant, including the Applicant’s Federal tax identification number, and either: (1) state that the entity is included on the most recent list published by the Department of the Interior in the Federal Register pur- suant to the Federally Recognized Indian July 30, 20121022012–31 I.R.B. Tribe List Act of 1994, Pub. L. 103–454, 108 Stat. 4791, or (2) provide a letter from the Department of the Interior stating that the Indian tribal government has been acknowledged as a Federally recognized Indian tribe. See section 4.e. of this notice for pool bond issuers and issuers of Tribal Economic Development Bonds other than the Indian tribal government that receives an allocation. b.Signatures. The Application must be signed and dated by an authorized of- ficial of the Applicant. For purposes of the Application, the term “authorized of- ficial of the Applicant” means an officer, board member, employee, or other offi- cial of the Applicant who is duly autho- rized to execute legal documents on be- half of the Applicant in connection with incurring debt of the Applicant (for exam- ple, a tribal chairperson, chief executive officer, or chief financial officer), similar to the kind of duly authorized official of an Indian tribal government who would be authorized to execute documents in con- nection with an Indian tribal government’s declaration of officialintenttoreimburse expenditures from the proceeds of a bor- rowing under § 1.150–2(e) of the Income Tax Regulations. c.Contact person. The Application must designate one or more persons with knowledge of the project that the Appli- cant duly authorizes to discuss with the IRS any information relating to the Appli- cation. The designation must include the designee’s name, title, telephone number, fax number, and mailing address. If a de- signee is not an official or officer of the is- suer, the Application must include an ex- ecuted Form 8821 (Taxpayer Information Authorization) or Form 2848 (Power of At- torney and Declaration of Representative) authorizing the disclosure of taxpayer in- formation specifically relating to the Ap- plication. d.Addresses. The Application must be submitted by hard copy accompanied by a copy of the Application in PDF format on a CD and sent by mail to the Internal Rev- enue Service (IRS), SE:T:GE:TEB:CPM, Attention: Mark Helfer, 1122 Town & Country Commons, St. Louis, MO 63017. e.Submission date. Applications will be accepted by the IRS on an ongoing ba- sis. See section 4 of this notice for fur- ther discussion of the general allocation process. f.Project description. The Application must contain the information required by this subsection f. (i)Qualified project. The Application must describe in reasonable detail the project or projects (project) reasonably ex- pected to be financed with the proceeds of the Tribal Economic Development Bonds (proposed bonds), including information regarding the type and use of the project and a certification that the project will qualify for Tribal Economic Development Bond financing under § 7871(f). Ap- plicants receiving anallocation may use proceeds of the proposed bonds only to finance the project or permitted deviations asfurtherprovidedinsection6ofthis notice. (ii)Project cost. The Application must describe the reasonably expected cost of the project, including the portion to be fi- nanced by the proposed bonds and any por- tion to be financed by other sources, if any. (iii)Location of project. The Applica- tion must include a certification that the project’s location is entirely within the Ap- plicant’s reservation. In the case of a joint project described in section 3.m. of this notice, the Application must include a cer- tification that the joint project will be lo- cated entirely within one or more of the reservations of the Indian tribal govern- ments receiving an allocation of volume cap for the joint project. (iv)Project not used for gaming pur- poses. The Application must include a certification that no portion of the pro- ceeds of the proposed bonds will be used to finance any portion of a building in which class II or class III gaming, as definedinsection4oftheIndianGam- ing Regulatory Act, Pub. L. 100–497, 102 Stat. 2475, codified at 25 U.S.C. § 2701–2721 (1988), is conducted or housed, or any other property actually used in the conduct of such gaming. For purposes of compliance with the limitation in § 7871(f)(3)(B) onthe use of proceeds of Tribal Economic Development Bonds for these purposes, the safe harbor regarding certain determinations with respect to separate buildings under § 10(b) of Notice 2009–51 applies. (v)Approvals. The Application must state that all required Federal, State, lo- cal, and tribal approvals (regulatory and otherwise) for the project, the proposed bonds, and any other required financing for the project have been obtained or, if any approvals have not yet been obtained, the Application must include a certifica- tion that the Applicant reasonably expects to receive all required approvals in a timely manner sufficient to permit issuance of the proposed bonds within the 180-day period prior to the expiration of the volume cap allocation (see section 4.g. of this no- tice). The Application must identify any required approvals that have not been ob- tained and must describe the Applicant’s plan and expected time frame for obtain- ingsuchapprovals. g.Plan of financing. The Applica- tion must contain a reasonably detailed de- scription of the plan of financing for the project including (1) the amount of Tribal Economic Development Bonds expected to be issued and the amount of proceeds of such bonds to be allocated to the project, (2) any reasonably expected other sources of financing for the project together with a description of how such financing will be allocated to the project, and (3) documen- tation from an independent third party who is knowledgeable aboutthe marketability of tax-exempt bonds evidencing that the proposed bonds are reasonably expected to be marketable prior to expiration of the volume cap allocation set forth in section 4.g. of this notice. Documentation that may be used to meet this requirement in- cludes, among other things, the following: a bond purchase commitment letter from an investor; a credit quality assessment ev- idencing the investment grade credit qual- ity of the proposed bonds from an indepen- dent organization that is in the business of assessing credit quality; a credit enhance- ment commitment letter from a financial institution that will enable the proposed bonds to be investment grade quality; a let- ter from an underwriter or financial advi- sor to the effect that the sale of the pro- posed bonds is likely to be successful in a timely manner before expiration of the vol- ume cap allocation for the bonds described in section 4.g. of this notice; or similar documentation or a combination thereof. h.Compliance with Federal tax laws. The Application must include a certifica- tion that the Applicant reasonably expects that the proposed bonds will meet the ap- plicable requirements of § 7871(f) and that the Applicant has engaged bond counsel to render an opinion to the effect that the pro- posed bonds will meet those requirements. 2012–31 I.R.B.103July 30, 2012 i.Dollar amount of allocation re- quested. The Application must specify the dollar amount of the volume cap re- quested, not to exceed the amount of the proposed bonds. j.Demonstration of readiness to issue. The Application must include a certifica- tion that the Applicant reasonably expects to use the volume cap allocation by issuing the proposed bonds prior to expiration of the volume cap allocation described in sec- tion 4.g. of this notice. Based on its over- all assessment of an Applicant’s readiness to issue the proposed bonds, the IRS may require the Applicant to provide additional information or supporting documentation to demonstrate the Applicant’s readiness to issue such bonds, and the Application will be treated as incomplete until the IRS re- ceives the additional information or docu- mentation. k.Certain forfeitures. In determining an Applicant’s readiness to issue the pro- posed bonds under section 3.j. of this no- tice, the IRS will not take into account or otherwise consider any prior forfeitures or expirations of volume cap that occurred with respect to the original allocations of volume cap received for Tribal Economic Development Bonds under the 2009 First Allocation or the 2010 Second Allocation. Indeterminingsuchreadinesstoissuethe proposed bonds, however, the IRS may consider any forfeitures or expirations of volume cap previously received under this notice. The Application must identify any allocation of volume cap (not including any allocations received in the 2009 First Allocation or the 2010 Second Allocation) previously received by the Applicant un- der this notice that was forfeited or expired and provide an explanation of the reasons for such forfeiture. l.Multiple projects. Subject to other limitations and requirements described herein, an Applicant may submit a single Application for volume cap that covers multiple projects, provided that such Ap- plication includes sufficient information to satisfy the requirements of this notice for each project independently of any other project covered by the Application (for example, for each project covered by the Application, the Application must include a plan of financing, a description of the project including costs and location, and a description of the status of approvals for that project). Alternatively, an Applicant may submit separate Applications for sep- arate projects. m.Joint projects. An Applicant may submit an Application for an allocation of volume cap to finance its share of a joint project all of which will be owned by In- dian tribal governments or which will, in part, be owned by an entity that is not an Indian tribal government, provided that the joint project will be located entirely on one or more of the reservations of any of the Indian tribal governments receiving an al- location with respectto such project. For this purpose, the type of joint ownership of facilities to be financed with Tribal Eco- nomic Development Bonds include only those recognized under the private activ- ity bond restrictions on tax-exempt bonds under § 141. n.Perjury statement. The Applica- tion must include the following declara- tion signed and dated by an authorized of- ficial of the Applicant: “I hereby certify that I am an authorized officer or official of the Applicant, that I am duly autho- rized to execute legal documents on behalf of the Applicant in connection with incur- ring debt, and that I am duly authorized to execute legal documents on behalf of the Applicant in making this Application. Under penalties of perjury, I declare that (i) I have knowledge of the relevant facts and circumstances relating to this Applica- tion and the project(s), (ii) I have examined this Application and the supporting docu- ments, and (iii) to the best of my knowl- edge and belief, all of the facts contained in this Application and the supporting doc- uments are true, correct and complete.” If the Applicant subsequently submits any additional information or supporting docu- ments with respect to the Application, such additional information or supporting docu- ments must be accompanied by a declara- tion, signed and dated by an authorized of- ficial of the Applicant, in a form substan- tially identical to the declaration submitted with the Application pursuant to the pre- ceding sentence. SECTION 4. GENERAL ALLOCATION PROCESS a.Priority of Allocations. Except as otherwise provided in this section 4, for Applications filed with the IRS that meet the requirements in this notice, the IRS will allocate an amount of available vol- ume cap equal to the amount requested in the Application on a first-come, first- served basis by order of submission date (as defined in section 4.b. of this notice). b.Submission date and incomplete Applications. Each Application will be treated as submitted on the day (sub- mission date) the Application, and any additional information and supporting documents requested by the IRS, are re- ceived by the IRS and such Application, additional information, and supporting documents satisfy all of the applicable re- quirements of this notice, including being submitted as described in section 3 of this notice. The IRS may request additional information to support any of the require- ments of this notice, including additional information and certifications to demon- strate that the proposed project will qualify for Tribal Economic Development Bond financing under § 7871(f) and to demon- strate the Applicant’s readiness to issue the proposed bonds. The Application will not satisfy the requirements of this notice until the IRS receives such information. c. Limit on allocation to any one In- dian tribal government. No Indian tribal government will receive an allocation of volume cap that would cause the aggre- gate amount of volume cap allocated to that Indian tribal government pursuant to this notice (not including any allocations received in the 2009 First Allocation or the 2010 Second Allocation or amounts for- feited under section 4.g. or 4.i. of this no- tice) to exceed the Published Volume Cap Limit (as defined in the next sentence) in effect for the period that includes the sub- mission date. The Published Volume Cap Limit for any period is the greater of: (1) 20% of the amount of available volume cap as of the first day of such period (deter- mined by the IRS based on available infor- mation, including allocation data and re- ports of bonds issued); or (2) $100 mil- lion. The Published Volume Cap Limit for the initial period beginning on the date of this notice is $360,569,329 (20% of $1,802,846,643). The IRS plans to publish updated Published Volume Cap Limits on the IRS website athttp://www.irs.gov/tax- exemptbond/index.htmlor at such other lo- cation as the IRS may provide future pub- lic notice. Beginning no later than Octo- ber 1, 2012, the IRS will publish these up- dates for successive two-month periods on or about the first business day of each pe- July 30, 20121042012–31 I.R.B. riod. For purposes of this limitation, an In- dian tribal government includes the Indian tribal government, together with any polit- ical subdivisions of the Indian tribal gov- ernment, and any entities controlled by the Indian tribal government. An Application that requests an allocation of volume cap in an amount that would cause the Published Volume Cap Limit in effect on the date of submission to be exceeded will be treated as incomplete until the day the Applicant supplements the Application in a manner that complies with the requirements of the notice and does not cause such limit to be exceeded. d.Available volume cap limitation.The IRS will not make an allocation that would cause the total amount of volume cap allo- cated (not including forfeited allocations) to exceed the $2 billion statutory limit for Tribal Economic Development Bonds. In general, if the total amount of volume cap requested in an Application meeting the requirements of this notice exceeds the amount of available volume cap on the submission date (determined by the IRS based on available information, including allocation data and reports of bonds is- sued), then the Applicant will have the op- portunity to receive a portion of the avail- able volume cap. Further, if two or more Applications meeting the requirements of this notice are filed on the same submis- sion date and the amount of available vol- ume cap on that date is less than the to- tal amount of requested volume cap un- der those Applications, then each Appli- cant will be given the opportunity to re- ceive a portion of the available volume cap in proportion to their requested amount of volume cap. In any circumstance in which available volume cap is in an amount less than the amount requested, the IRS will no- tify the Applicant and the Applicant will be provided 30 days to notify the IRS (at the address specified in section 3.d. of this notice) of its decision to accept the allo- cation in the lesser amount or to delay the allocation for up to 180 days from the sub- mission date to determine if future forfei- tures of volume cap may allow the Appli- cant to receive the full amount requested. If the Applicant decides to delay receiving its allocation, it will also notify the IRS of whether it will accept a lesser alloca- tion if forfeitures of volume cap during the delay period are insufficient to allow the Applicant to receive the full amount re- quested. If the Applicant does not notify the IRS of its decision within 30 days of such IRS’ notice to the Applicant, the Ap- plication will be treated as withdrawn. In any circumstance in which an allocation of volume cap may be in an amount less than the amount requested, the IRS may require the Applicant to supplement the Applica- tion to demonstrate that the requirements of this notice are satisfied if based on an Application for the reduced allocation. e.Section 17 corporations, subdivi- sions of Indian tribal governments, and pool bond issuers. (1) For purposes of issuing proposed Tribal Economic Development Bonds, an Applicant that receives an allocation may assign the allocation to an Indian tribal corporation organized under section 17 of the Indian Reorganization Act of 1934, 25 U.S.C. section 477 (2012) (a Section 17 Corporation), 1 or to a subdivision of the Indian tribal government that satisfies the requirements of § 7871(d) to be treated as a political subdivision of a State, provided the assignment and use of the allocation conforms in all respects (other than with respect to the issuer of the bonds) to the Application of the assigning Applicant. (2) An Applicant that receives an allo- cation may assign the allocation to a pool bond issuer to issue the proposed bonds provided that the proceeds of the proposed bonds are then loanedto the Applicant and provided that the pool bond issuer is it- self an Indian tribal government, a subdi- vision of an Indian tribal government that satisfies the requirements of § 7871(d) for treatment as a political subdivision of a State, or a Section 17 Corporation. Pooled Tribal Economic Development Bonds will be subject to the provisions of § 149(f). (3) Any bonds issued by a subdivision of an Indian tribal government, a Section 17 Corporation, or a pool bond issuer will be treated for purposes of a volume cap allocation as if they were bonds issued by Applicant. Allocations will not be made to a pool bond issuer. (4) The allocation limit of section 4.c. of this notice for any one Indian tribal gov- ernment applies to the Applicant without regard to how the proposed bonds are is- sued (i.e.,whether the issuer is a subdivi- sion of an Indian tribal government, a Sec- tion 17 Corporation, or a pool bond issuer). f.Confirmation of allocation.TheIRS will send the Applicant that receives a vol- ume cap allocation a letter confirming the allocation (allocation letter). g.Expiration of allocation. Applicants have 180 days from the date of the alloca- tion letter to issue the proposed bonds. To the extent that the proposed bonds are not issued within 180 days of the date of the allocation letter, the portion of such allo- cation for which bonds have not been is- sued will be treated as forfeited and will be available for reallocation. h.Extensions and new Applications. The IRS does not expect to grant exten- sions to the expiration date of the volume cap allocation as set forth in section 4.g. of this notice. An Indian tribal govern- ment that is unable to issue the proposed bonds within the 180-day period from the date of the allocation letter may reapply for an allocation. The new Application must comply with this notice, including by pro- viding the information described in section 3.k. of this notice, and will be subject to the submission provisions of section 4.b. and the applicable limits set forth in sec- tion 4 of this notice. i.Voluntary forfeiture. If an Applicant determines that it does not intend to use an allocation of volume cap to issue the proposed bonds (including circumstances in which the Applicant determines to fi- nance the project with financing other than the proposed bonds), the Applicant should notify the IRS in writing at the address set forth in section 3.d. of this notice of its in- tention to forfeit the allocation. The notice will permit the IRS to treat the allocation as forfeited as of the date the IRS receives the notification, and the forfeited amount will be available to reallocate. 1 Federally-chartered corporations organized and controlled by Indian tribal governments under section 17 of the Indian Reorganization Act of 1934 are eligible Indian tribal governmental issuers of tax-exempt bonds under § 7871 and eligible governmental users ofproceeds of tax-exempt bonds for purposes of the private business restrictions on governmental bonds under § 141. See Treas. Reg. § 1.301.7701–1(a)(3) (Section 17 Corporations are integral parts of Indian tribal governments and are not recognized as separate entities apart from the Indian tribal governments for Federal tax purposes); Rev. Rul. 94–16, 1994–1 C.B. 19 (Section 17 Corporations are not separate taxable entities apart from the controlling Indian tribes and are not subject to Federal income taxation). 2012–31 I.R.B.105July 30, 2012 SECTION 5. CONSENT TO DISCLOSURE OF ALLOCATION To provide the public with information on how the volume cap has been allo- cated and to facilitate oversight of the Tribal Economic Development Bond pro- gram, the IRS intends to publish certain data regarding the results of the allo- cation process. The data will be most useful to the public if it identifies the specific allocations awarded. Pursuant to § 6103, consent is required for the IRS to disclose identifying information with re- spect to Applicants awarded an allocation. Therefore, the IRS seeks the consent of Applicants to the disclosure by the IRS of the name of the issuer, the type of project to be financed by the Tribal Economic Development Bonds, the reservation on which the project is to be located, the reasonably expected cost of the project, and the amount of volume cap allocation awarded to that Applicant. To provide valid consent, the consent must be in the form set forth in Appendix B. This consent to disclosure of certain information about allocations, however, is optional for Ap- plicants. An Applicant is not required to consent to disclosure to receive an alloca- tion. The IRS will not publish identifying information on Applications that are not awarded an allocation of volume cap or pending Applications but may publish an aggregate amount of allocations for which no consent was received. SECTION 6. INSUBSTANTIAL DEVIATIONS FROM INFORMATIONINAPPLICATION; EFFECTS OF OTHER CHANGES a.Insubstantial deviations.Ingen- eral, an allocation of volume cap is valid for purposes of § 7871(f)(1) if the pro- posed bonds are issued, and the proceeds of such bonds are allocated to expendi- tures, in a manner that does not substan- tially deviate from the information sub- mitted in the Application. For this pur- pose, whether a deviation from the infor- mation submitted in the Application con- stitutes an insubstantial deviation is deter- mined based on all the facts and circum- stances using criteria similar to those used under § 5f.103–2(f)(2), as amended or sup- plemented from time to time, regarding in- substantial deviations in the information required for public approval of tax-exempt private activity bonds under § 147(f) of the Code. No further approval is necessary from, and requests for approvals should not be submitted to, the IRS with respect to such insubstantial deviations. Never- theless, the Applicant must give the IRS notice of the deviation. If the insubstan- tial deviation occurs before the submission of the Notice of Issuance described in sec- tion 7.a. of this notice, the Notice of Is- suance must include a description of the insubstantial deviation. If the insubstan- tial deviation occurs after the submission of the Notice of Issuance, the Applicant must submit a supplement to the Notice of Issuance which describes the insubstantial deviation. The supplement should contain a copy of the notice of Issuance as well as the details of the deviation and should be sent to the same address as the Notice of Issuance. b.Substantial deviations—In general. (1) Other than as described in section 6.b.(2) below, an allocation of volume cap under an Application is invalid for purposes of § 7871(f) if there is a change relating to the issuance of the proposed bonds or the allocation of the proceeds of such bonds to expenditures that sub- stantially deviates from the information submitted in the Application. In the event of such a change prior to the issuance of its proposed bonds, the Applicant may notify the IRS that it does not intend to use the original allocation of bond volume cap as described in section 4.i. of this notice and submit a new Application reflecting the modified information. The new Ap- plication must comply with this notice, including by providing the information described in section 3.k. of this notice, and will be subject to the submission pro- visions of section 4.b. and the applicable allocation limits in section 4 of this notice. (2)Certain post-issuance deviations.A substantial deviation that occurs after the proposed bonds are issued and prior to the allocation of gross proceeds of such bonds to expenditures under the general rule set forth in § 1.148–6(d)(1)(iii) will not invali- date the allocation of volume cap under the Application if the Applicant submits a sup- plement to the Notice of Issuance (as de- fined in section 7.a. of this notice) to the IRS. The supplement must (1) be sent to the address set forth in section 7.a. of this notice, (2) describe the substantial devia- tion between the information submitted in the Application and the actual information subsequent to the bond issuance, and (3) include a certification that the Applicant has received an opinion from bond counsel to the effect that the change will not cause the bonds to fail to meet all applicable re- quirements of § 7871(f) and the applica- ble requirements of §§ 103 and 141 and the regulations under such sections. SECTION 7. INFORMATION REPORTING a.Notice of issuance. Not later than 15 days after issuance of the proposed bonds, the Applicant shall send to the IRS a notice of issuance (Notice of Issuance) of such bonds, which shall include the following information: (1) the Applicant’s name and taxpayer identification number; (2) the is- sue price of the bonds issued; (3) the issue date of the bonds; and (4) a description of the project financed with the bonds. If the Applicant fails to respond within 15 days to an IRS request for confirmation that either the Notice of Issuance has been sub- mitted or that the Applicant has voluntarily forfeited the allocation, the IRS, in its dis- cretion, may treat allocations as forfeited and available for reallocation. The Appli- cant shall send the Notice of Issuance to the IRS at the following address: Internal Revenue Service, SE:T:GE:TEB:CPM, Attention: Mark Helfer, 1122 Town & Country Commons, St. Louis, MO 63017. Further, in the case of the issuance of any Tribal Economic Development Bonds that involves an insubstantial deviation under section 6.a. of this notice that occurs before submission of the Notice of Issuance, the Notice of Issuance shall include a description of the insubstantial deviation. For insubstantial deviations that occur after submission of the Notice of Issuance, see section 6.a. of this notice. b.Regular information reporting. Subject to updated IRS information re- porting forms or procedures, an issuer of Tribal Economic Development Bonds should complete Part II of Form 8038–G by checking the box on Line 18 (Other), writing“Tribal Economic Development Bonds”in the space provided for the bond description, and entering the issue price of the Tribal Economic Development Bonds in the Issue Price column. For purposes of this notice, the term “issue” has the mean- July 30, 20121062012–31 I.R.B. ing used for tax-exempt bond purposes in § 1.150–1(c). SECTION 8. PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT The information collection contained in this notice has been approved by the Of- fice of Management and Budget (OMB) in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35) under control number 1545–2233. Under the Paperwork Reduction Act, an agency may not conduct or sponsor and a person is not required to respondtoacollectionofinformationun- less it displays a valid OMB control num- ber. Sections 3 and 7 of this notice contain the collections of information. That infor- mation is required in order to inform the IRS of an Applicant’s desire to receive an allocation of volume cap for Tribal Eco- nomic Development Bonds and to deter- mine the amount of volume cap that may be allocated to each Applicant. The collec- tions of information are mandatory for any Applicant that wishes to receive an allo- cation of volume cap for Tribal Economic Development Bonds. The likely respon- dents will be eligible issuers of Tribal Eco- nomic Development Bonds. We estimate the total number of respon- dents to be 143 and the total annual re- sponses to be 143. We estimate it will take 7 hours to comply. Estimates of the annu- alized cost to respondents for the hour bur- dens shown are not available at this time. Books or records relating to a collection of information must be retained as long as their contents may become material in the administration of any internal revenue law. Generally, tax returns and return in- formation are confidential, as required by § 6103. SECTION 9. DRAFTING INFORMATION The principal authors of this notice are Debbie Cho of the IRS Office of Tax Ex- empt Bonds and Timothy L. Jones of the Office of Chief Counsel. However, other personnel from the Treasury and the IRS participated in its development. For fur- ther information regarding this notice, con- tact Timothy L. Jones at (202) 622–3701 (not a toll-free call). For further infor- mation about submitted applications, con- tact Mark Helfer at (636) 255–1201 (not a toll-free call). 2012–31 I.R.B.107July 30, 2012 APPENDIX A APPLICATION FOR ALLOCATION OF TRIBAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT BOND VOLUME CAP Internal Revenue Service SE:T:GE:TEB:CPM Attention: Mark Helfer 1122 Town & Country Commons St. Louis, MO 63017 Dear Sir or Madam: The following constitutes the application (Application) of (Name) (Applicant) for allocation of tribal economic development bond (Tribal Economic Development Bond) volume cap under § 7871(f) of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) (unless otherwise noted, section references herein are to the Code). 1. Name of Applicant/issuer. Street Address CityStateZip Telephone NumberFax Number EIN 2. Status of issuer.(Select as appropriate) The Applicant/issuer is a “qualifiedissuer” under § 7871(f) because it is — (i) an Indian tribal entity that appears on the most recent list published by the Department of the Interior in the Federal Register pursuant to the Federally Recognized Indian Tribe List Act of 1994, Pub. L. 103–454, 108 Stat. 4791 (List), as demonstrated by the attached documents included as Exhibit A. (ii) an Indian tribal government that is acknowledged as a Federally recognized Indian tribe,as stated in a letter from the Department of the Interior, as demonstrated by the attached documents included as Exhibit A. 3. Description of the project.A description of the project to be financed (Project), including information regarding the type and use of the Project and a certification that the Project will qualify for Tribal Economic Development Bond financing under § 7871(f), is set forth below or in attached Exhibit B. If the Project is a jointly owned Project, please describe the other owners of the Project and the Applicant’s ownership interest in the Project. If the Application relates to multiple Projects, the Applicant must include separate project-specific information in all relevant portions of the Application for each separate project (for example, for each separate project, the Application must separately include a plan of financing, describe the project including costs and location, and describe the status of the project’s approval). 4. Pool issuances. Does the Applicant expect to have the Tribal Economic Development Bonds issued by a pool issuer or an “on behalf of issuer”? If the answer above is yes, please describe the pool issuer or “on behalf of issuer” and provide a statement that the pool issuer is an Indian tribal government or that the “on behalf of issuer” meets the requirements to be such an issuer under the rules applicable to bonds issued under § 103. Location of the Project. Reservation where the Project will be located: Include in the attached Exhibit C, a certification that the Project will be located entirely on the Applicant’s reservation. If the Tribal Economic Development Bonds will be issued for a joint project please include in the attached Exhibit C a certification that the Project will be locatedentirely within one or more of the reservations of at least one of the Indian tribal governments receiving an allocation with respect to such Project. July 30, 20121082012–31 I.R.B. 5.Not used for gaming purposes. Include in the attached Exhibit D a certification that no portion of the proceeds of any bonds issued pursuant to the requested allocation will be used to finance any portion of a building in which class II or class III gaming (as defined in section 4 of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act) is conducted or housed, or anyother property actually used in the conduct of such gaming. 6. Individual to contact for more information about the Project. Individual Name and Title Company Name Street Address CityStateZip Telephone Number Fax Number Email Address (Include as appropriate)The contact person is not an authorized official orofficer of the Applicant and a properly executed Form 8821 (or Form 2848) is included with this Application that authorizes the disclosure by the IRS of information that relates to this Application and the Project(s) described above to the contact person. 7. Approvals. Include in the attached Exhibit E a certification that all required Federal,State, local, and tribal approvals (regulatory and otherwise) for the Project, the proposed Tribal Economic Development Bonds, and any other required financing for the Project have been obtained or, if any approvals have not yet been obtained, a certification that the Applicant reasonably expects to receive all required approvals in a timely manner sufficient to permit issuance of the proposed Tribal Economic Development Bonds within the 180-day period allowed for issuance of bonds under an allocation. In addition, include in the attached Exhibit E which required approvals have not been obtained and describe the Applicant’s plan and expected time frame for obtaining such approvals. 8. Plan of financing. Include in the attached Exhibit F a plan of financing for the Project which includes: a reasonably detailed plan of financing which includes (1) the amountof Tribal Economic Bonds expected to be issued and the amount of proceeds of such bonds to be allocated to the project, (2)any reasonably expected other sources of financing for the project together with a description of how such financing will be allocated to the project, and (3) documentation from an independent third party who is knowledgeable about the marketability of tax-exempt bonds evidencing that the proposed bonds are reasonably expected to be marketable prior to expiration of the volume capallocation set forth in section 4.g. of the notice. Documentation that may be used to meet this requirement for the proposed bonds includes, among others, the following: a bond purchase commitment letter from an investor; a credit quality assessment evidencing the investment grade credit quality of the proposed Tribal Economic Development Bonds from an independent organization that is in the business of assessing credit quality; a credit enhancement commitment letter from a financial institution that will enable the Tribal Economic Development Bonds to be investment grade credit quality; or a letter from an underwriter or financial advisor to the effect that the sale of the proposed bonds is likely to be successful in a timely manner before expiration of the volume cap for the allocation; or similardocumentation or a combination thereof. 9. Compliance with federal tax laws. Include in the attached Exhibit G a certification that the Applicant reasonably expects that the proposed bonds will meet all applicable requirements of § 7871(f) and that the Applicant has engaged bond counsel to render an opinion to the effect that the proposed bonds will meet those requirements. 10. Certification of readiness to issue. Include in the attached Exhibit H a certification that the Applicant reasonably expects to use the volume cap allocation by issuing Tribal Economic Development Bonds prior to the expiration of the volume cap allocation. 11. Certain forfeitures.If the Applicant previously received an allocation of Tribal Economic Development Bond volume cap (not including any allocations received in allocations announced by the IRS on September 15, 2009 and February 9, 2010) that was forfeited, then the Applicant must identify any such forfeited allocation and include an explanation of the reasons for such prior forfeiture. 12. Reimbursements.(For reimbursements, include the following statement.)The Applicant intendsto use the proceeds of Tribal Economic Development Bonds to reimbursecosts of the Project in accordance with § 1.150–2.(In addition, the Applicant must demonstrate that the requirements of § 1.150–2 will be met.) 2012–31 I.R.B.109July 30, 2012 13. Refundings.(For refundings or refinancings, include the following statement.)The Applicant intendsto use the proceeds of Tribal Economic Development Bonds to refund or refinance prior debt in circumstances that would qualify for a refunding or refinancing with tax-exempt bonds by a State or local government under § 103. In addition, the Applicant must demonstrate that applicable requirements for such a refunding or refinancing issue will be met. 14. Dollar amount of allocationrequested for the Project.The Applicant hereby requests aTribal Economic Development Bond allocation in the amount of $ 15.Assignment of allocations to another issuer.(If the Applicant expects to assign its allocation to another qualified issuer of Tribal Economic Development Bonds as authority for the Tribal Economic Development Bond issuer to issue bonds for the project on behalf of the Applicant, the Applicant should provide the following statement.) The Applicant expects to assign the requested allocation for Tribal Economic Development Bonds volume cap to a qualified issuer of Tribal Economic Development Bonds as authority for the Tribal Economic Development Bond issuer to issue bonds for the project on behalf of the Applicant. Applicant agrees to obtain a written commitment from the assignee Tribal Economic Development Bond issuer that it is a qualified issuer of Tribal Economic Development Bonds and that it will issue Tribal Economic Development Bonds for the project within the time framespecified in the Application for the Applicant’s bonds. 16. Penalty of perjury statement and signatures. I hereby certify that I am an authorizedofficer or official of the Applicant, that I am duly authorized to execute legal documents on behalf of the Applicant in connection with incurring debt, and that I am duly authorized to execute legal documents on behalf of the Applicant in making this Application. Under penalties of perjury, I declare that (i) I have knowledge of the relevant facts and circumstances relating tothis Application and the Project(s), (ii) I have examined this Application and the supporting documents, and (iii) to the best of my knowledge and belief, all of the facts contained in this Application and the supporting documents are true, correct and complete. By: Name: Title: Date: July 30, 20121102012–31 I.R.B. Exhibit A DOCUMENTS REGARDING ISSUER STATUS AS AN INDIAN TRIBAL GOVERNMENT (RESPONSE TO QUESTION 2 OF THE APPLICATION) (Attached hereto) 2012–31 I.R.B.111July 30, 2012 Exhibit B DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT (RESPONSE TO QUESTION 3 OF THE APPLICATION) (Attached hereto) July 30, 20121122012–31 I.R.B. Exhibit C PROJECT LOCATION ON INDIAN TRIBAL GOVERNMENT RESERVATION (RESPONSE TO QUESTION 5 OF THE APPLICATION) 2012–31 I.R.B.113July 30, 2012 EXHIBIT D STATEMENT WITH RESPECT TO GAMING (RESPONSE TO QUESTION 6 OF THE APPLICATION) July 30, 20121142012–31 I.R.B. Exhibit E APPROVALS (RESPONSE TO QUESTION 8 OF THE APPLICATION) (Attached hereto) 2012–31 I.R.B.115July 30, 2012 Exhibit F PLAN OF FINANCING (RESPONSE TO QUESTION 9 OF THE APPLICATION) (Attached hereto) July 30, 20121162012–31 I.R.B. EXHIBIT G COMPLIANCE WITH FEDERAL TAX LAWS (RESPONSE TO QUESTION 10 OF THE APPLICATION) (Attached hereto) 2012–31 I.R.B.117July 30, 2012 EXHIBIT H STATEMENT OF READINESS TO ISSUE (RESPONSE TO QUESTION 11 OF THE APPLICATION) I hereby certify that I am an authorized officer or official of the Applicant, that I am duly authorized to execute legal documents on behalf of the Applicant in connection with incurring debt, and that I am duly authorized to execute legal documents on behalf of the Applicant in making this Application. I certify that theApplicant reasonably expects to issue the Tribal Economic Development Bonds pursuant to the allocation of volume cap for those bonds to be received pursuant to the Application prior to the expiration date of the volume cap allocation. By: Name: Title: Date: July 30, 20121182012–31 I.R.B. APPENDIX B CONSENT TO PUBLIC DISCLOSURE OF CERTAIN TRIBAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT BOND APPLICATION INFORMATION In the event that the Application of [(Insert name of Applicant here): ] (Applicant) for an allocation of authority to issue tribal economic development bonds (Tribal Economic Development Bonds) under § 7871(f) of the Internal Revenue Code is approved, the undersigned authorized representative of the Applicant hereby consents to the disclosure by the Internal Revenue Service through publication of a Notice in the Internal Revenue Bulletin or other public release of the name of Applicant (issuer), the type of projectto be financed by the Tribal Economic Development Bonds, the reservation on which the project is to be located, the reasonablyexpected cost of the project, and the amount of the allocation, if any, of volume cap authority to issue Tribal Economic Development Bonds awarded to the Applicant. The undersigned understands that this information might be published, broadcast, discussed or otherwise disseminated in the public record. This authorization shall become effective upon the execution hereof. Except to the extent disclosure is authorized herein, the returns and return information of the undersigned taxpayer are confidential and are protected by law under the Internal Revenue Code. I certify that I have the authority toexecute this consent to disclose on behalf of the taxpayer named below. Date: Signature: Print name: Title: Name of Applicant-Taxpayer: Taxpayer Identification Number: Taxpayer’s Address: Note: Treasury Regulations require that the Internal Revenue Service must receive this consent within 60 days after it is signed and dated. 2012 Section 43 Inflation Adjustment Notice 2012–49 Section 43(b)(3)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code requires the Secretary to publish an inflation adjustment factor. The enhanced oil recovery credit under § 43 for any taxable year is reduced if the “reference price,” determined under § 45K(d)(2)(C), for the calendar year preceding the calendar year in which the taxable year begins is greater than $28 multiplied by the inflation adjustment fac- tor for that year. The credit is phased out in any taxable year in which the reference price for the preceding calendar year ex- ceeds $28 (as adjusted) by at least $6. The term “inflation adjustment factor” means, with respect to any calendar year, a fraction the numerator of which is the GNP implicit price deflator for the preced- ing calendar year and the denominator of which is the GNP implicit price deflator for 1990. Because the reference price for the 2011 calendar year ($95.73) exceeds $28 mul- tiplied by the inflation adjustment factor for the 2011 calendar year ($43.92) by $51.81, the enhanced oil recovery credit for qualified costs paid or incurred in 2012 is phased out completely. Table 1 contains the GNP implicit price deflator used for the 2012 calendar year, as well as the previously published GNP implicit price deflators used for the 1991 through 2011 calendar years. 2012–31 I.R.B.119July 30, 2012 Notice 2012–49 TABLE 1 GNP IMPLICIT PRICE DEFLATORS Calendar YearGNP Implicit Price Deflator 1990112.9 (used for 1991) 1991117.0 (used for 1992) 1992120.9 (used for 1993) 1993124.1 (used for 1994) 1994 126.0 (used for 1995)* 1995107.5 (used for 1996) 1996109.7 (used for 1997)** 1997 112.35 (used for 1998) 1998112.64 (used for 1999)*** 1999 104.59 (used for 2000) 2000106.89 (used for 2001) 2001109.31 (used for 2002) 2002110.63 (used for 2003) 2003 105.67 (used for 2004)**** 2004 108.23 (used for 2005) 2005 112.129 (used for 2006) 2006116.036 (used for 2007) 2007 119.656 (used for 2008) 2008122.407 (used for 2009) 2009109.764 (used for 2010)***** 2010 110.654 (used for 2011) 2011113.347 (used for 2012)****** * Beginning in 1995, the GNP implicit pricedeflator was rebased relative to 1992. The 1990 GNP implicit price deflator used to compute the 1996 § 43 inflation adjustment factor is 93.6. ** Beginning in 1997, two digits follow the decimal point in the GNPimplicit price deflator. The 1990 GNP price deflator used to compute the 1998 § 43 inflation adjustment factor is 93.63. *** Beginning in 1999, the GNP implicit price deflator was rebased relative to 1996. The 1990 GNP implicit price deflator used to compute the 2000 § 43 inflation adjustment factor is 86.53. **** Beginning in 2003, the GNP implicit price deflator was rebased, and the 1990 GNP implicit price deflator used to compute the 2004 § 43 inflation adjustment factor is 81.589. ***** Beginning in 2009, the GNP implicit price deflator was rebased, and the 1990 GNP implicit price deflator used to compute the 2010 § 43 inflation adjustment factor is 72.199. ****** Beginning in 2011, the 1990 GNP implicit price deflator used to compute the 2012 § 43 inflation adjustment factor is 72.260. July 30, 20121202012–31 I.R.B. Table 2 contains the inflation adjust- ment factor and the phase-out amount for taxable years beginning in the 2012 calendar year as well as the previously published inflation adjustment factors and phase-out amounts for taxable years be- ginning in the 1991 through 2011 calendar years. Notice 2012–49 TABLE 2 INFLATION ADJUSTMENT FACTORS AND PHASE-OUT AMOUNTS Calendar YearInflation Adjustment FactorPhase-out Amount 19911.00000 19921.03630 19931.07080 19941.09920 1995 1.11600 1996 1.1485 0 19971.17200 19981.19990 19991.20300 20001.20870 2001 1.2353 0 20021.26330 2003 1.2785 0 2004 1.2952 0 2005 1.32660 20061.3743100 percent 20071.4222100 percent 20081.4666100 percent 2009 1.5003 100 percent 2010 1.5203 100 percent 2011 1.5326 100 percent 2012 1.5686 100 percent DRAFTING INFORMATION The principal author of this notice is Martha M. Garcia of the Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Passthroughs and Special Industries). For further information regarding this notice, contact Ms. Garcia at (202) 622–3110 (not a toll-free call). 2012 Marginal Production Rates Notice 2012–50 This notice announces the applicable percentage under § 613A of the Internal Revenue Code to be used in determining percentage depletion for marginal proper- ties for the 2012 calendar year. Section 613A(c)(6)(C) defines the term “applicable percentage” for purposes of determining percentage depletion for oil and gas produced from marginal proper- ties. The applicable percentage is the per- centage (not greater than 25 percent) equal to the sum of 15 percent, plus one per- centage point for each whole dollar by which $20 exceeds the reference price (de- termined under § 45K(d)(2)(C)) for crude oil for the calendar year preceding the cal- endar year in which the taxable year be- gins. The reference price determined un- der § 45K(d)(2)(C) for the 2011 calendar year is $95.73. The following table contains the ap- plicable percentages for marginal produc- tion for taxable years beginning in calen- dar years 1991 through 2012. 2012–31 I.R.B.121July 30, 2012 Notice 2012–50 APPLICABLE PERCENTAGE FOR MARGINAL PRODUCTION Calendar YearApplicable Percentage 1991 15 percent 199218 percent 199319 percent 199420 percent 1995 21 percent 199620 percent 199716 percent 199817 percent 199924 percent 200019 percent 2001 15 percent 2002 15 percent 2003 15 percent 2004 15 percent 200515 percent 2006 15 percent 2007 15 percent 2008 15 percent 2009 15 percent 2010 15 percent 2011 15 percent 2012 15 percent The principal author of this notice is Martha M. Garcia of the Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Passthroughs and Special Industries). For further information regarding this notice, contact Ms. Garcia at (202) 622–3110 (not a toll-free call). July 30, 20121222012–31 I.R.B. Definition of Terms Revenue rulings and revenue procedures (hereinafter referred to as “rulings”) that have an effect on previous rulings use the following defined terms to describe the ef- fect: Amplifieddescribes a situation where no change is being made in a prior pub- lished position, but the prior position is be- ingextendedtoapplytoavariationofthe fact situation set forth therein. Thus, if an earlier ruling held that a principle ap- plied to A, and the new ruling holds that the same principle also applies to B, the earlier ruling is amplified. (Compare withmodi- fied,below). Clarifiedis used in those instances where the language in a prior ruling is be- ing made clear because the language has caused, or may cause, some confusion. It is not used where a position in a prior ruling is being changed. Distinguisheddescribes a situation where a ruling mentions a previously pub- lished ruling and points out an essential difference between them. Modifiedis used where the substance of a previously published position is being changed. Thus, if a prior ruling held that a principle applied to A but not to B, and the new ruling holds that it applies to both A and B, the prior ruling is modified because it corrects a published position. (Compare withamplifiedandclarified, above). Obsoleteddescribes a previously pub- lished ruling that is not considered deter- minative with respect to future transac- tions. This term is most commonly used in a ruling that lists previously published rul- ings that are obsoleted because of changes in laws or regulations. A ruling may also be obsoleted because the substance has been included in regulations subsequently adopted. Revokeddescribes situations where the position in the previously published ruling is not correct and the correct position is beingstatedinanewruling. Supersededdescribes a situation where the new ruling does nothing more than re- state the substance and situation of a previ- ously published ruling (or rulings). Thus, the term is used to republish under the 1986 Code and regulations the same po- sition published under the 1939 Code and regulations. The term is also used when it is desired to republish in a single rul- ing a series of situations, names, etc., that were previously published over a period of time in separate rulings. If the new rul- ing does more than restate the substance of a prior ruling, a combination of terms is used. For example,modifiedandsu- persededdescribes a situation where the substance of a previously published ruling is being changed in part and is continued without change in part and it is desired to restate the valid portion of the previously published ruling in a new ruling that is self contained. In this case, the previously pub- lished ruling is first modified and then, as modified, is superseded. Supplementedis used in situations in which a list, such as a list of the names of countries, is published in a ruling and that list is expanded by adding further names in subsequent rulings. After the original rul- ing has been supplemented several times, a new ruling may be published that includes the list in the original ruling and the ad- ditions, and supersedes all prior rulings in the series. Suspendedis used in rare situations to show that the previous published rulings will not be applied pending some future action such as the issuance of new or amended regulations, the outcome of cases in litigation, or the outcome of a Service study. Abbreviations The fol lowing abbreviations in current use and for merly used will appear in material publis hedintheBulletin. A—Individual. Acq.—A cquiescence. B—Individual. BE—Beneficiary. BK—Bank . B.T.A.—Board of Tax Appeals. C—Individual. C.B.—Cu mulative Bulletin. CFR—Code of Federal Regulations. CI—City. COOP—Coo perative. Ct.D.—Court Decision. CY—County. D—Decede nt. DC—Dummy Corporation. DE—Donee. Del. Order —Delegation Order. DISC—Domestic International Sales Corporation. DR—Donor. E—Estate. EE—Employee. E.O.—Executive Order. ER—Emp loyer. ERISA—Employee Retirement Income Security Act. EX—Executor. F—Fiduc iary. FC—Foreign Country. FICA—Federal Insurance Contributions Act. FISC—Fo reign International Sales Company. FPH—Foreign Personal Holding Company. F.R.—Federal Register. FUTA—Fed eral Unemployment Tax Act. FX—Foreign corporation. G.C.M.—Chief Counsel’s Memorandum. GE—Grante e. GP—General Partner. GR—Grantor. IC—Insura nce Company. I.R.B.—Internal Revenue Bulletin. LE—Lessee. LP—Limited Partner. LR—Lessor. M—Minor. Nonacq.—No nacquiescence. O—Organization. P—Parent Corporation. PHC—Persona l Holding Company. PO—Possession of the U.S. PR—Partner. PRS—Pa rtnership. PTE—Prohibited Transaction Exemption. Pub. L.—Public Law. REIT—Re al Estate Investment Trust. Rev. Proc.—Revenue Procedure. Rev. Rul.—Revenue Ruling. S—Subsi diary. S.P.R.—Statement of Procedural Rules. Stat.—Statutes at Large. T—Target Corporation. T.C.—Tax Court. T.D.—Treasury Decision. TFE—Trans feree. TFR—Transferor. T.I.R.—Technical Information Release. TP—Taxpay er. TR—Trust. TT—Trustee. U.S.C.—Uni ted States Code. X—Corporation. Y—Corporation. Z—Corporat ion. 2012–31 I.R.B.iJuly 30, 2012 Numerical Finding List 1 Bulletins 2012–27 through 2012–31 Announcements: 2012-26, 2012-27 I.R.B.8 2012-27, 2012-27 I.R.B.10 2012-28, 2012-27 I.R.B.10 Notices: 2012-39, 2012-31 I.R.B.95 2012-44, 2012-28 I.R.B.45 2012-45, 2012-29 I.R.B.59 2012-46, 2012-30 I.R.B.86 2012-47, 2012-31 I.R.B.98 2012-48, 2012-31 I.R.B.102 2012-49, 2012-31 I.R.B.119 2012-50, 2012-31 I.R.B.121 Proposed Regulations: REG-134042-07, 2012-27 I.R.B.5 REG-153627-08, 2012-29 I.R.B.60 REG-125570-11, 2012-30 I.R.B.93 REG-134935-11, 2012-29 I.R.B.64 REG-141832-11, 2012-28 I.R.B.54 REG-107889-12, 2012-28 I.R.B.53 REG-113738-12, 2012-29 I.R.B.66 Revenue Procedures: 2012-28, 2012-27 I.R.B.4 2012-29, 2012-28 I.R.B.49 Revenue Rulings: 2012-19, 2012-28 I.R.B.16 2012-20, 2012-27 I.R.B.1 Treasury Decisions: 9591, 2012-28 I.R.B.32 9592, 2012-28 I.R.B.41 9593, 2012-28 I.R.B.17 9594, 2012-29 I.R.B.57 9595, 2012-30 I.R.B.71 9596, 2012-30 I.R.B.84 1 A cumulative list of all revenue rulings, revenueprocedures, Treasury decisions, etc., publishedin Internal Revenue Bulletins 2012–1 through 2012–26 is in Internal Revenue Bulletin 2012–26, dated June 25, 2012. July 30, 2012ii2012–31 I.R.B. Finding List of Current Actions on Previously Published Items 1 Bulletins 2012–27 through 2012–31 Proposed Regulations: REG-100276-97 Withdrawn by Ann. 2012-27, 2012-27 I.R.B.10 1 A cumulative list of current actions on previously published items in Internal Revenue Bulletins 2012–1 through 2012–26 is in Internal Revenue Bulletin 2012–26, dated June 25, 2012. 2012–31 I.R.B.iiiJuly 30, 2012 INDEX Internal Revenue Bulletins 2012–27 through 2012–31 The abbreviation and number in parenthesis following the index entry refer to the specific item; numbers in roman and italic type following the parentheses refer to the Internal Revenue Bulletin in which the item may be found and the page number on which it appears. Key to Abbreviations: AnnAnnouncement CDCourt Decision DODelegation Order EOExecutive Order PLPublic Law PTEProhibited Transaction Exemption RPRevenue Procedure RRRevenue Ruling SPRStatement of Procedural Rules TCTax Convention TDTreasury Decision TDOTreasury Department Order EMPLOYEE PLANS Amendment of prohibited payment option under defined sin- gle–employer defined benefit plan of plan sponsor in bank- ruptcy (REG–113738–12) 29,66 Application of section 162(m)(4)(C) to dividends and dividend equivalents (RR 19) 28,16 Election to include in gross income in year of transfer (RP 29) 28,49 Full funding limitations, weighted average interest rates, seg- ment rates for: July 1, 2012 (Notice 47) 31,98 Proposed Regulations: 26 CFR 1.411(d)–4, amended; amendment of prohibited pay- ment option under defined single–employer defined benefit plan of plan sponsor in bankruptcy (REG–113738–12) 29, 66 26 CFR 1.6081–11, amended; 301.6057–1, amended; report- ing and notice requirements for deferred vested benefits un- der section 6057 (REG–153627–08) 29,60 Reporting and notice requirements for deferred vested benefits under section 6057 (REG–153627–08) 29,60 Underfunded plans, notice requirements (Notice 46) 30,86 ESTATE TAX Portability of a deceased spousal unused exclusion amount (TD 9593) 28,17; (REG–141832–11) 28,54 Proposed Regulations: 26 CFR 20.2001–2, added; 20.2010–0, thru –3, added; 25 CFR 25.2505–0, thru –2, added; portability of a deceased spousal unused exclusion amount (REG–141832–11) 28, 54 ESTATE TAX—Cont. Regulations: 26 CFR 20.2001–2T, added; 20.2010–0T, thru –2T, added; 25.2505–0T, thru –3T, added; 602.101, amended; porta- bility of a deceased spousal unused exclusion amount (TD 9593) 28,17 EXCISE TAX Disregarded entities and the indoor tanning services excise tax (TD 9596) 30,84; (REG–125570–11) 30,95 Proposed Regulations: 26 CFR 1.1361–4, amended; 301.7701–2, amended; disre- garded entities and the indoortanning services excise tax (REG–125570–11) 30,95 Regulations: 26 CFR 1.1361–4, amended; 1.1361–4T, added; 301.7701–2T, added; disregarded entities and the indoor tanning services excise tax (TD 9596) 30,84 GIFT TAX Portability of a deceased spousal unused exclusion amount (TD 9593) 28,17; (REG–141832–11) 28,54 Proposed Regulations: 26 CFR 20.2001–2, added; 20.2010–0, thru –3, added; 25 CFR 25.2505–0, thru –2, added; portability of a deceased spousal unused exclusion amount (REG–141832–11) 28, 54 Regulations: 26 CFR 20.2001–2T, added; 20.2010–0T, thru –2T, added; 25.2505–0T, thru –3T, added; 602.101, amended; porta- bility of a deceased spousal unused exclusion amount (TD 9593) 28,17 INCOME TAX Application of section 162(m)(4)(C) to dividends and dividend equivalents (RR 19) 28,16 Basis of indebtedness of S corporations to their shareholders (REG–134042–07) 27,5 Bonds: Qualified energy conversation bonds (Notice 44) 28,45 Tribal economic development bonds (Notice 48) 31,102 Corporations, regulations undersection 367(d) applicable to cer- tain outbound asset reorganizations (Notice 39) 31,95 Disciplinary actions involving attorneys, certified public ac- counts, enrolled agents, and enrolled actuaries (Ann 28) 27, 10 Election to include in gross income in year of transfer (RP 29) 28,49 Financial asset securitization investment trusts (Ann 27) 27,10 Interest: Investment: Federal short-term, mid-term, and long-term rates for: July (RR 20) 27,1 July 30, 2012iv2012–31 I.R.B. INCOME TAX—Cont. Marginal production rates, 2012 (Notice 50) 31,121 Modification to consolidated return regulation permitting an election to treat a liquidation of a target, followed by a recon- tribution to a new target, as a cross-chain reorganization (TD 9594) 29,57 Overall foreign loss recapture on property dispositions (REG–134935–11) 29,64 Proposed Regulations: 26 CFR 1.108–7, amended; 1.366–0, amended; 1.1366–2, –5, amended; 1.1367–1(h), amended; 1.1367–3, amended; ba- sis of indebtedness of S corporations to their shareholders (REG–134042–07) 27,5 26 CFR 1.904–4, amended; 1.904(g)–3, amended; over- all foreign loss recaptureon property dispositions (REG–134935–11) 29,64 26 CFR 1.7874–3, added; substantial business activities (REG–107889–12) 28,53 Qualifying income under section 7704(d) (RP 28) 27,4 Regulations: 26 CFR 1.904–0, –1, –2, –7, –8, amended; 1.904(f)–0T, –1T, –2T, –7T, –8T, removed; 1.904(g)–0, –1, –2, –3, amended; 1.904(g)–0T, –1T, –2T, –3T, removed; 1.502–9, amended, 1.1502–9T, removed; treatment of overall foreign and do- mestic losses (TD 9595) 30,71 26 CFR 1.1502–13, amended; 1.1502–13T, removed; 602.101, amended; modification to consolidated return regulation permitting an election to treat a liquidation of a target, followed by a recontribution to a new target, as a cross-chain reorganization (TD 9594) 29,57 26 CFR 1.7874–1, amended; 1.7874–1T, removed; 1.7874–2, added; surrogate foreigncorporations (TD 9591) 28,32 26 CFR 1.7874–3T, added; substantial business activities (TD 9592) 28,41 Section 43 inflation adjustment, 2012 (Notice 49) 31,119 Substantial business activities (TD 9592) 28,41; (REG–107889–12) 28,53 Surrogate foreign corporations (TD 9591) 28,32 Tax Convention: U.S.-Netherlands agreement of limited funds for mutual ac- count (LFMA) (Ann 26) 27,8 Treatment of income from certain government bonds for pur- poses of the passive foreign investment company (PFIC) rules (Notice 45) 29,59 Treatment of overall foreign and domestic losses (TD 9595) 30, 71 2012–31 I.R.B.vJuly 30, 2012 July 30, 20122012–31 I.R.B. 2012–31 I.R.B.July 30, 2012 July 30, 20122012–31 I.R.B. Internal Revenue Service W ashington,DC20224 Official Business Penalty for Private Use, $300 INTERNAL REVENUE BULLETIN The Introduction at the beginning of this issue describes the purpose and content of this publication. The weekly Internal Revenue Bulletin is sold on a yearly subscription basis by the Superintendent of Documents. Current subscribers are notified by the Superin- tendent of Documents when their subscriptions must be renewed. CUMULATIVE BULLETINS The contents of this weekly Bulletin are consolidated semiannually into a permanent, indexed, Cumulative Bulletin. These are sold on a single copy basis andare notincluded as part of the subscription to the Internal Revenue Bulletin. For the foreseeable future, the IRS will not create Cumulative Bulletins after the 2008–2 edition. Subscribers to the weekly Bulletin are notified when copies of the Cumulative Bulletin are available. Certain issues of Cumulative Bulletins are out of print and are not available. Persons desiring available Cumulative Bulletins, which are listed on the reverse, may purchase them from the Superintendent of Documents. ACCESS THE INTERNAL REVENUE BULLETIN ON THE INTERNET You may view the Internal Revenue Bulletin on the Internet at www.irs.gov. Select Businesses. Under Businesses Topics, select More Topics. Then select Internal Revenue Bulletins. INTERNAL REVENUE BULLETINS ON CD-ROM Internal Revenue Bulletins are available annually as part ofPublication 1796 (Tax Products CD-ROM). The CD-ROM can be purchased from National Technical Information Service (NTIS) on the Internet at www.irs.gov/cdorders (discount for online orders) or by calling 1-877-233-6767. The first release is available in mid-December and the final release is available in late January. HOW TO ORDER Check the publications and/or subscription(s) desired on the reverse, complete the order blank, enclose the proper remittance, detach entire page, and mail to the Superintendent of Documents, P.O. Box 979050, St. Louis, MO 63197–9000. Please allow two to six weeks, plus mailing time, for delivery. WE WELCOME COMMENTS ABOUT THE INTERNAL REVENUE BU LLETIN If you have comments concerning the format or production of the Internal Revenue Bulletin or suggestions for improving it, we would be p leased to hear from you. You can email us your suggestions or comments through the IRS Internet Home Page (www.irs.gov) or write t o the IRS Bulletin Unit, SE:W:CAR:MP:T:M:S, Washington, DC 20224.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.