n-06-101.pdf

Preserve advance releases and the authoritative Internal Revenue Bulletin rendition; directory timestamps are file-publication metadata, not legal effective dates. HTML bulletins begin June 2003; earlier available issues require full PDF parsing.

This collection currently includes the publisher’s available advance-release directory. Historical bulletin renditions are discovered separately; an advance-release record alone does not certify the collection archive complete.

1
Part III - Administrative, Procedural, and Miscellaneous

United States Income Tax Treaties That Meet the Requirements of Section
1(h)(11)(C)(i)(II)

Notice 2006-101

1. SUMMARY
The Jobs and Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2003 (P.L. 108-27, 117
Stat. 752) (the “2003 Act”) was enacted on May 28, 2003. Subject to certain limitations,
the 2003 Act generally provides that a dividend paid to an individual shareholder from
either a domestic corporation or a “qualified foreign corporation” is subject to tax at the
reduced rates applicable to certain capital gains. A qualified foreign corporation
includes certain foreign corporations that are eligible for benefits of a comprehensive
income tax treaty with the United States that the Secretary determines is satisfactory for
purposes of this provision and that includes an exchange of information provision. On
October 20, 2003, the Service published Notice 2003-69, 2003-2 C.B. 851, which
contains a list of the U.S. tax treaties that met these requirements at that time. This
notice updates the list of U.S. tax treaties that meet these requirements to reflect new
U.S. income tax treaties and protocols that have entered into force since the publication
of Notice 2003-69.
2. ANALYSIS

2
Section 1(h)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) generally provides that
a taxpayer’s “net capital gain” for any taxable year will be subject to a maximum tax rate
of 15 percent (or 5 percent in the case of certain taxpayers). The 2003 Act added
section 1(h)(11), which provides that net capital gain for purposes of section 1(h) means
net capital gain (determined without regard to section 1(h)(11)) increased by “qualified
dividend income.” Qualified dividend income means dividends received during the
taxable year from domestic corporations and “qualified foreign corporations.” Section
1(h)(11)(B)(i). Subject to certain exceptions, a qualified foreign corporation is any
foreign corporation that is either (i) incorporated in a possession of the United States, or
(ii) eligible for benefits of a comprehensive income tax treaty with the United States that
the Secretary determines is satisfactory for purposes of this provision and that includes
an exchange of information program (the “treaty test”). Section 1(h)(11)(C)(i).
A foreign corporation that does not satisfy either of these two tests is treated as a
qualified foreign corporation with respect to any dividend paid by such corporation if the
stock with respect to which such dividend is paid is readily tradable on an established
securities market in the United States. Section 1(h)(11)(C)(ii). See Notice 2003-71,
2003-2 C.B. 922, for the definition, for taxable years beginning on or after January 1,
2003, of “readily tradable on an established securities market in the United States.”
A qualified foreign corporation does not include any foreign corporation that for
the taxable year of the corporation in which the dividend was paid, or the preceding
taxable year, is a passive foreign investment company (as defined in section 1297).
Section 1(h)(11)(C)(iii). A dividend from a qualified foreign corporation is also subject to

3
the other limitations in section 1(h)(11). For example, a shareholder receiving a
dividend from a qualified foreign corporation must satisfy the holding period
requirements of section 1(h)(11)(B)(iii).
The appendix to this notice sets forth the current list of U.S. income tax treaties
that meet the requirements of section 1(h)(11)(C)(i)(II). Three U.S. income tax treaties
do not meet the requirements of section 1(h)(11)(C)(i)(II). The tax treaties with
Bermuda and the Netherlands Antilles are not comprehensive income tax treaties within
the meaning of section 1(h)(11). The U.S.-U.S.S.R. income tax treaty, which was
signed on June 20, 1973, and currently applies to certain former Soviet Republics, does
not include an information exchange program.
At the time Notice 2003-69 was published, the income tax treaty with Barbados
was determined not to be satisfactory for purposes of section 1(h)(11) because of
concern that the treaty may have operated to provide benefits that were intended to
mitigate or eliminate double taxation in cases where there was no risk of double
taxation. See
, e.g., H.R. Rep. 108-126, 108
th
Cong., 1
st
Sess., at 42 (2003) (conference
report on the 2003 Act). On July 14, 2004, the United States and Barbados signed a
Second Protocol to the U.S.-Barbados income tax treaty (the “Second Protocol”), which
entered into force on December 20, 2004. The Second Protocol amended the U.S.-
Barbados income tax treaty by substituting a new limitation on benefits article that
reflected developments in U.S. treaty policy and was designed to eliminate in particular
the availability of certain inappropriate benefits under the existing treaty. Following the
changes made by the Second Protocol, the income tax treaty with Barbados has been

4
determined to be satisfactory for purposes of section 1(h)(11).
The updated list in the appendix to this notice also contains two U.S. income tax
treaties that entered into force after the publication of Notice 2003-69: the U.S. income
tax treaties with Sri Lanka (which entered into force on July 12, 2004) and Bangladesh
(which entered into force on August 7, 2006).
Treasury and the IRS intend to update this list, as appropriate. Situations that
may result in changes to the list include the entry into force of new income tax treaties
and the amendment or renegotiation of existing tax treaties. Further, Treasury and the
IRS continue to study the operation of each of our income tax treaties, including the
implications of any change in the domestic laws of the treaty partner, to ensure that the
treaty accomplishes its intended objectives and continues to be satisfactory for
purposes of this provision. It is anticipated that any changes to the list of income tax
treaties that meet the requirements of section 1(h)(11)(C)(i)(II) will apply only to
dividends paid after the date of publication of the revised list.
Finally, in order to be treated as a qualified foreign corporation under the treaty
test, a foreign corporation must be eligible for benefits of one of the U.S. income tax
treaties listed in the Appendix. Accordingly, the foreign corporation must be a resident
within the meaning of such term under the relevant treaty and must satisfy any other
requirements of that treaty, including the requirements under any applicable limitation
on benefits provision.
3. EFFECTIVE DATE
This notice is effective with respect to Bangladesh for dividends paid on or after

5
August 7, 2006. This notice is effective with respect to Barbados for dividends paid on
or after December 20, 2004. This notice is effective with respect to Sri Lanka for
dividends paid on or after July 12, 2004. This notice is effective with respect to all other
U.S. income tax treaties listed in the Appendix for taxable years beginning after
December 31, 2002.
4. EFFECT ON OTHER DOCUMENTS
Notice 2003-69 is amplified and superseded.
5. CONTACT INFORMATION
The principal author of this notice is Ana C. Guzman of the Office of Associate
Chief Counsel (International). For further information regarding this notice contact Ms.
Guzman at (202) 622-3880 (not a toll-free call).

6
APPENDIX
U.S. INCOME TAX TREATIES SATISFYING THE REQUIREMENTS OF
SECTION 1(h)(11)(C)(i)(II)

Australia Germany Lithuania Slovenia
Austria Greece Luxembourg South Africa
Bangladesh Hungary Mexico Spain
Barbados Iceland Morocco Sri Lanka
Belgium India Netherlands Sweden
Canada Indonesia New Zealand Switzerland
China Ireland Norway Thailand
Cyprus Israel Pakistan Trinidad and Tobago
Czech Republic Italy Philippines Tunisia
Denmark Jamaica Poland Turkey
Egypt Japan Portugal Ukraine
Estonia Kazakhstan Romania United Kingdom
Finland Korea Russian Federation Venezuela
France Latvia Slovak Republic