n-07-18.pdf

Preserve advance releases and the authoritative Internal Revenue Bulletin rendition; directory timestamps are file-publication metadata, not legal effective dates. HTML bulletins begin June 2003; earlier available issues require full PDF parsing.

This collection currently includes the publisher’s available advance-release directory. Historical bulletin renditions are discovered separately; an advance-release record alone does not certify the collection archive complete.

1
Part III. Administrative, Procedural, and Miscellaneous

Definition of Party and Allocation of Net Income or Proceeds for Purposes
of Section 4965

Notice 2007-18

I Purpose

This notice provides guidance under section 4965 of the Internal Revenue Code
(“Code”) to tax-exempt entities described in section 4965(c) that may be parties
to prohibited tax shelter transactions. This notice also provides guidance to tax-
exempt entities described in sections 4965(c)(1), (2), and (3) (referred to herein
as Non-Plan Entities) subject to tax under section 4965(a) regarding the
allocation to various periods of net income or proceeds attributable to a
prohibited tax shelter transaction. In particular, this notice responds to written
comments requesting guidance regarding the definition of the term “party to a
prohibited tax shelter transaction” for purposes of section 4965 and related
disclosure provisions and regarding the appropriate treatment of net income or
proceeds received prior to the effective date of the section 4965(a) tax.

II Background

The Tax Increase Prevention and Reconciliation Act of 2005 (“TIPRA”), Pub. L.
No. 109-222, 120 Stat. 345,
enacted on May 17, 2006, designates certain
transactions as prohibited tax shelter transactions and includes new entity-level
and manager-level excise taxes and disclosure rules applicable to prohibited tax
shelter transactions to which a tax-exempt entity is a party. TIPRA creates new
section 4965 and amends sections 6033(a)(2), 6011(g), and 6652(c)(3) of the
Code.

A. Imposition of Excise Tax on Certain Tax-Exempt Entities

Section 4965(a) requires Non-Plan Entities to pay an excise tax “for the taxable
year in which the entity becomes [a party to a prohibited tax shelter transaction]
and any subsequent taxable year in the amount determined under [section
4965(b)].” Non-Plan Entities include those entities described in section
4965(c)(1) through (3) -- i.e., entities described in section 501(c), 501(d), section
170(c) (other than the United States), and Indian tribal governments (within the
meaning of section 7701(a)(40)). Section 4965(e)(1) defines the term “prohibited
tax shelter transaction” to mean (1) “any listed transaction,” and (2) “any
prohibited reportable transaction.” A “listed transaction” is defined by cross-
reference to section 6707A(c)(2). A “prohibited reportable transaction” means
any confidential transaction under Treas. Reg. § 1.6011-4(b)(3) or any
transaction with contractual protection under Treas. Reg. § 1.6011-4(b)(4) which
is a reportable transaction as defined by section 6707(c)(1). Pursuant to

2
Revenue Procedure 2007-20, IRB 2007-7 (Feb. 12, 2007), transactions in which
the refundable or contingent fee is related to tax credits under sections 42 and
45D of the Code will not be treated as reportable transactions for purposes of
Treas. Reg. § 1.6011-4(b)(4) and, thus, will not be subject to section 4965.

B. General Computation Rule

Section 4965(b)(1) provides that, for a transaction other than a “subsequently
listed transaction” as defined in section 4965(e)(2), the amount of the excise tax
imposed on the Non-Plan Entity is computed based on the greater of (1) the
entity’s net income “for the taxable year” attributable to the transaction or (2) 75
percent of the proceeds “received by the entity for the taxable year” which are
attributable to the transaction.

C. Computation Rule for Subsequently Listed Transactions

Section 4965(e)(2) defines the term “subsequently listed transaction” as any
transaction to which a tax-exempt entity is a party and which is determined by the
Secretary to be a listed transaction at any time after the entity has become a
party to the transaction, provided, however, that the transaction was not a
prohibited reportable transaction at the time the entity became a party to the
transaction.

Section 4965(b)(1) provides that for a subsequently listed transaction, the
amount of the excise tax is based on the greater of (1) the entity’s net income for
the taxable year which is attributable to the prohibited tax shelter transaction and
is “properly allocable” to the period beginning on the later of the date the
transaction is identified as a listed transaction or the first day of the taxable year,
or (2) 75 percent of the proceeds received by the entity for the taxable year which
are attributable to the prohibited tax shelter transaction and which are “properly
allocable” to the period beginning on the later of the date the transaction is
identified as a listed transaction or the first day of the taxable year.

D. Effective Date

Section 516(d) of TIPRA provides that section 4965 generally applies to taxable
years ending after the date of enactment with respect to transactions entered into
before, on, or after that date. However, “no tax under section 4965(a) . . . shall
apply with respect to income or proceeds that are properly allocable to any
period ending on or before the date which is 90 days after the date of
enactment.” The 90
th
day after the date of enactment was August 15, 2006.

Section 4965(f) authorizes the Secretary to promulgate regulations providing
guidance “regarding the determination of the allocation of net income or
proceeds of a tax-exempt entity attributable to a transaction to various periods,

3
including before and after the listing of the transaction or the date which is 90
days after the date of the enactment of this section.”

On July 11, 2006, the Internal Revenue Service (“Service”) released Notice
2006-65, 2006-31 I.R.B. 102, which alerted taxpayers to the new provisions and
solicited comments regarding these provisions. The Service received numerous
written comments in response to Notice 2006-65. Many of the comments
requested guidance regarding the circumstances under which a tax exempt entity
will be considered a “party” to a prohibited tax shelter transaction, as well as how
the Service intends to exercise its allocation authority under section 4965(f),
particularly with respect to transactions entered into prior to the enactment of
section 4965.

The Service and the Treasury Department intend to issue further guidance under
section 4965 and the related statutory provisions. Pending the issuance of
further guidance, taxpayers may rely upon the guidance in this notice.

III Definition of Party

A. In General

For purposes of sections 4965, 6033(a)(2) and 6011(g), a tax-exempt entity is a
party to a transaction if it (1) facilitates the transaction by reason of its tax-
exempt, tax indifferent or tax-favored status; or (2) is identified in published
guidance, by type, class or role, as a party to a prohibited tax shelter transaction.

Published guidance may identify which tax-exempt entities, by type, class or role,
will not be treated as a party to a prohibited tax shelter transaction for purposes
of sections 4965, 6033(a)(2) and 6011(g).

B. Examples

Example 1. A tax-exempt entity enters into a transaction ("Transaction A") with
an S corporation. Transaction A is the same as or substantially similar to the
transaction identified by the Secretary as a listed transaction in Notice 2004-30,
2004-1 C.B. 828. The tax-exempt entity’s role in Transaction A is similar to the
role of the exempt party, as described in Notice 2004-30. The tax-exempt entity
purportedly receives the S corporation stock and, due to the tax-exempt entity's
tax-exempt status, aids the S corporation and its shareholders in avoiding
taxable income. The tax-exempt entity facilitates Transaction A by reason of its
tax-exempt, tax indifferent or tax-favored status. Accordingly, the tax-exempt
entity is a party to Transaction A for purposes of sections 4965, 6033(a)(2) and
6011(g).

Example 2. A tax-exempt entity is a partner in a partnership. The partnership
has a number of other taxable and tax-exempt partners. The partnership enters

4
into a number of transactions, including a transaction (“Transaction B”) which is
the same as or substantially similar to the transaction identified by the Secretary
as a listed transaction in Notice 2002-35, 2002-1 C.B. 992 (as clarified and
modified by Notice 2006-16, 2006-9 IRB 538). The partnership participates in
Transaction B in a role similar to the role of T, as described in Notice 2002-35,
i.e., the role of the taxpayer receiving the purported tax benefits from the
transaction. The tax and economic consequences from Transaction B to the
other partners are not dependent on the tax-exempt entity’s tax-exempt, tax
indifferent or tax-favored status. Accordingly, the tax-exempt entity does not
facilitate Transaction B by reason of its tax-exempt, tax indifferent or tax-favored
status. The tax-exempt entity also has not been identified, by type, class or role,
as a party to a prohibited tax shelter transaction in published guidance.
Therefore, the tax-exempt entity is not a party to Transaction B for purposes of
sections 4965, 6033(a)(2) and 6011(g).

The IRS and Treasury Department recognize that "party" as used in section 4965
applies more broadly than the term is defined for purposes of this interim
Notice. Accordingly, the IRS and Treasury Department will propose regulations
that will define "party" under section 4965 to include a tax-exempt entity that
enters into a prohibited tax shelter transaction that reduces such entity’s liability
for applicable Federal taxes (i.e., employment taxes, excise taxes, and
in appropriate cases unrelated business income tax).

IV Net Income and Proceeds

A. In general

For purposes of section 4965(a), the amount and the timing of the net income
and proceeds attributable to the prohibited tax shelter transaction will be
computed in a manner consistent with the substance of the transaction. In
determining the substance of listed transactions, the Service will look to, among
other items, the listing guidance and any subsequent published guidance relating
to the transaction.

B. Allocation of net income / proceeds to a taxable year

In general, for purposes of section 4965(a), the net income and proceeds
attributable to a prohibited tax shelter transaction must be allocated to a
particular taxable year in a manner consistent with the Non-Plan Entity’s
established method of accounting for Federal income tax purposes. If the Non-
Plan Entity has not established a method of accounting for Federal income tax
purposes, the Non-Plan Entity must use the cash receipts and disbursements
method of accounting (“cash method”) provided for in section 446 of the Code to
determine the amount and timing of net income and proceeds attributable to a
prohibited tax shelter transaction solely for purposes of section 4965(a). If a
Non-Plan Entity has established a method of accounting other than the cash

5
method, the Non-Plan Entity may nevertheless use the cash method of
accounting to determine the amount of the net income and proceeds attributable
to a prohibited tax shelter transaction entered into prior to the date of enactment
of section 4965 and allocable to pre- and post-enactment periods.

If a Non-Plan Entity has not established a taxable year for Federal income tax
purposes, the entity’s taxable year for the purpose of determining the amount
and timing of net income and proceeds attributable to a prohibited tax shelter
transaction will be deemed to be the annual period the entity has used in keeping
its books and records.

Any net income or proceeds attributable to a prohibited tax shelter transaction
allocated to a taxable year ending on or before August 15, 2006 under this
section IV, will not be subject to the excise tax imposed by section 4965(a).

C. Examples

Example 3.
In 1999, X, a calendar year Non-Plan Entity using the cash method
of accounting, entered into a lease-in/lease-out transaction (“LILO”) substantially
similar to the transaction described in Notice 2000-15, 2000-1 C.B. 826
(describing Rev. Rul. 99-14, 1999-1 C.B. 835, superseded by Rev. Rul. 2002-69,
2002-2 C.B. 760). In 1999, X purported to lease property to Y pursuant to a
“head lease,” and Y purported to lease the property back to X pursuant to a
“sublease” of a shorter term. In form, X received $268M as an advance payment
of head lease rent. Of this amount, $200M had been, in form, financed by a
nonrecourse loan obtained by Y. X deposited the $200M with a “debt payment
undertaker.” This served to defease both a portion of X’s rent obligation under its
sublease and Y’s repayment obligation under the nonrecourse loan. Of the
remainder of the $268M advance head lease rent payment, X deposited $54M
with an “equity payment undertaker.” This served to defease the remainder of
X’s rent obligation under the sublease. This amount inures to the benefit of Y
and enables Y to recover its investment in the transaction and a return on that
investment. In substance, the $54M is a loan from Y to X. X retained the
remaining $14M of the advance head lease rent payment. In substance, this
represents an accommodation fee for X’s participation in the transaction.

According to the substance of the transaction, the head lease, sublease and
nonrecourse debt will be ignored for Federal income tax purposes. Therefore,
any net income or proceeds resulting from these elements of the transaction will
not be considered net income or proceeds attributable to the LILO transaction for
purposes of section 4965(a).

Under X’s established cash basis method of accounting, any net income and
proceeds received in 1999 and attributable to the LILO transaction are allocated
to X’s December 31, 1999, tax year for purposes of section 4965. Because the

6
1999 tax year is before the effective date of TIPRA, X will not be subject to any
excise tax under section 4965 for the amounts received in 1999.

D. Special rule relating to taxable years that include August 16, 2006

In the case of the taxable year that includes August 16, 2006 (“the transition
year”), the Service will treat the period beginning on the first day of the transition
year and ending on August 15, 2006, and the period beginning on August 16,
2006, and ending on the last day of the transition year as short taxable years.
This treatment is solely for purposes of allocating net income or proceeds under
section 4965, and the Non-Plan Entity does not file tax returns with respect to
these short taxable years or otherwise take the short taxable year into account
for Federal tax purposes. Accordingly, the net income or proceeds that are
properly allocated to the transition year in accordance with this section IV will be
treated as follows:

• as allocable to the period ending on or before August 15, 2006, (and
accordingly not subject to tax under section 4965(a)) to the extent such
net income or proceeds would have been properly taken into account in
accordance with this section IV by the Non-Plan Entity in the deemed
short year ending on August 15, 2006; and
• as allocable to the period beginning after August 15, 2006, (and
accordingly subject to tax under section 4965(a)) to the extent such
income or proceeds would have been properly taken into account in
accordance with this section IV by the Non-Plan Entity in the short year
beginning August 16, 2006.

Example 4.
B, a Non-Plan Entity using the cash method of accounting, has an
annual accounting period that ends on December 31, 2006. B became a party to
a prohibited tax shelter transaction on March 15, 2006. On that date, B received
a payment of $600,000 as an accommodation fee for its involvement in the
transaction. B received no other proceeds or income attributable to this
transaction in 2006. Under B’s method of accounting, the payment received by B
on March 15, 2006, is taken into account in the deemed short year ending on
August 15, 2006. Accordingly, solely for purposes of section 4965, the payment
is treated as allocable solely to a period ending on or before August 15, 2006,
and is not subject to the excise tax imposed by section 4965(a).

Example 5.
The facts are the same as in Example 2, above, except that B
received an additional payment of $400,000 on September 30, 2006. Under B’s
method of accounting, the payment received by B on September 30, 2006, is
taken into account in the deemed short year beginning on August 16, 2006.
Accordingly, solely for purposes of section 4965, the payment is treated as
allocable to a period beginning after August 15, 2006, and is subject to the excise
tax imposed by section 4965(a).

7
IV Request For Comments

The Service anticipates issuing further guidance under section 4965 and related
statutory provisions and invites comments from the public regarding all aspects
of these provisions and, in particular, regarding the definition of the term “party to
a prohibited tax shelter transaction” for purposes of section 4965 and related
disclosure provisions, the appropriate method for allocating net income or
proceeds (including, specifically, with respect to governments) to various periods,
including pre- and post-listing periods for subsequently listed transactions, and
the definition of the term “proceeds” for section 4965 purposes. Written
comments should be submitted by March 23, 2007. Send submissions to:
CC:PA:LPD:PR (Notice 2007-18), room 5203, Internal Revenue Service, POB
7604, Ben Franklin Station, Washington, DC 20044. Submissions may be hand
delivered Monday through Friday between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. to:
CC:PA:LPD:PR (Notice 2007-18), Courier’s Desk, Internal Revenue Service,
1111 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC. Alternatively, taxpayers may
submit comments electronically to notice.comments@irscounsel.treas.gov

(Notice 2007-18).

V Drafting Information

The principal author of this notice is Galina Kolomietz of the Office of Division
Counsel/Associate Chief Counsel (Tax-Exempt and Government Entities). For
further information regarding this notice, contact Ms. Kolomietz at (202) 622-6070
(not a toll-free call).