n-09-79.pdf

Preserve advance releases and the authoritative Internal Revenue Bulletin rendition; directory timestamps are file-publication metadata, not legal effective dates. HTML bulletins begin June 2003; earlier available issues require full PDF parsing.

This collection currently includes the publisher’s available advance-release directory. Historical bulletin renditions are discovered separately; an advance-release record alone does not certify the collection archive complete.

Part III - Administrative, Procedural, and Miscellaneous

Modifications of Commercial Mortgage Loans Held by an Investment Trust

Notice 2009-79

In TD 9463, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and the Treasury Department
issued final regulations relating to permitted modifications of commercial mortgage
loans held by a real estate mortgage investment conduit (REMIC). See TD 9463, 74 FR
(No. 178, September 16, 2009), (amending § 1.860G-2(b)(3) of the Income Tax
Regulations). In response to a request for comments in Notice 2007-17, 2007-1 C.B.
748 (March 19, 2007), and in response to proposed regulations published in the Federal
Register (72 FR 63523) on November 9, 2007, several commentators recommended
that the scope of the regulations project be expanded to include a rule that would permit
investment trusts to modify commercial mortgage loans to the same extent that REMICs
can modify those loans under § 1.860G-2(b)(3) (taking into account the anticipated
amendments to that rule). The commentators, however, did not provide detailed
explanations for why those changes were needed or whether there are alternative ways
of dealing with investment trust interests held by REMICs.

The scope of the final regulations remained focused on § 1.860G-2(b)(3) and
was not expanded to include modifications of commercial mortgage loans held by
investment trusts. The IRS and the Treasury Department note that, although REMICs
and investment trusts are often used to securitize mortgages, the requirements for
classification as a REMIC are not identical to the requirements for classification as a
trust. The IRS and the Treasury Department continue to study the commentators'
recommendation and in this notice solicit input concerning whether additional guidance
may be appropriate.

# Background

Section 301.7701-1(b) of the Procedure and Administration Regulations provides
that the classification of organizations that are recognized as separate entities is
determined under §§ 301.7701-2, 301.7701-3, and 301.7701-4, unless a provision of
the Internal Revenue Code (Code) (such as section 860A addressing Real Estate
Mortgage Investment Conduits (REMICs)) provides for special treatment of that
organization.

Section 301.7701-2(a) provides that a "business entity" is an entity recognized for
federal tax purposes that is not properly classified as a trust under § 301.7701-4 or
otherwise subject to special treatment under the Code.

Section 301.7701-4(a) provides that, in general, an arrangement is treated as a
trust if it can be shown that the purpose of the arrangement is to vest in trustees
responsibility for the protection and conservation of property for beneficiaries who
cannot share in the discharge of this responsibility and, therefore, are not associates in
a joint enterprise for the conduct of business for profit.

Section 301.7701-4(b) provides that there are arrangements that are known as
trusts, because legal title to property is conveyed to trustees for the benefit of
beneficiaries, but that are not classified as trusts for purposes of the Code because they
are not simply arrangements to protect or conserve the property for the beneficiaries.
The beneficiaries generally create these trusts, which are often known as business or
commercial trusts, simply as a device to carry on a profit-making business. Such a
business normally would have been carried on through business organizations that the
Code classifies as corporations or partnerships (business entities).

Section 301.7701-4(c) provides that an "investment" trust is not classified as a
trust if there is a power under the trust agreement to vary the investment of the
certificate holders. See Comm'r v. North American Bond Trust, 122 F.2d 545 (2d Cir.
1941), cert. denied, 314 U.S. 701 (1942). An investment trust with a single class of
ownership interests representing undivided beneficial interests in the assets of the trust
is classified as a trust if there is no power to vary the investment of the certificate
holders.

A power to vary the investment of the certificate holders exists where there is a
managerial power, under the trust instrument, that enables a trust to take advantage of
variations in the market to improve the investment of the investors. See North American
Bond Trust, 122 F.2d at 546.

In previous published guidance, the IRS and the Treasury Department have
identified situations in which a power to vary is determined not to be present. For
example, in Rev. Rul. 73-460, 1973-2 C.B. 424, a sponsor establishes an investment
trust to hold municipal bonds. The sponsor has the power, under certain conditions,

such as a default by a bond issuer or substantial decline in the market value of certain
bonds, to direct the trustee to sell the affected bonds to preserve the sound investment
character of the trust. Except in case of default or probable default, the trustee is not
permitted to accept any new or substitute bonds from an obligor who is refunding or
refinancing bonds held by the investment trust. The trust agreement also requires that
moneys in the interest and principal accounts must be distributed to certificate holders.
Rev. Rul. 73-460 concludes that a power to vary is not necessarily present if there is a
power to dispose of trust assets to preserve the value of the trust in situations where, for
example default has occurred or there is a substantial decline in the value of the assets
provided that the proceeds of the sale are distributed to certificate holders and are not
reinvested in additional assets. Rev. Rul. 73-460 also concludes that a power to accept
an issuer's offer to exchange or substitute existing obligations held by the investment
trust pursuant to a plan for the refunding or refinancing of such obligations in situations
where the issuer has already defaulted or the occurrence of default is probable is not a
power to vary.

In Rev. Rul. 90-63, 1990-2 C.B. 270, a trustee has the power to consent to
changes in the credit support of debt obligations held by the trust, but the power is
exercisable only if the trustee reasonably believes that the changes are needed to
maintain the value of the trust assets by preserving the credit rating of the obligations.
Rev. Rul. 90-63 concludes that this power to change the credit support, exercisable only
if needed to preserve the value of the trust assets, is not a power to vary.

A "power to vary" was found to be present, however, in Rev. Rul. 78-149, 1978-1
C.B. 448. Rev. Rul. 78-149 involves a municipal bond trust in which the trustee has a

limited power to reinvest in certain types of municipal bonds. The trust agreement
provides that in the case of early redemption by a bond issuer, the trustee is permitted
to reinvest the proceeds in similarly rated bonds that mature no later than the last
maturity date of municipal bonds originally deposited in the trust. The trustee may also
choose to distribute the proceeds to the trust certificate holders. In holding that the trust
is an association taxable as a corporation for federal tax purposes, Rev. Rul. 78-149
concludes that "the power in the trust agreement permitting reinvestment of the
proceeds of obligations redeemed prior to maturity, even though limited to reinvestment
of the proceeds of redemptions over which the trust has no control, is a managerial
power that enables the trust to take advantage of variations in the market to improve the
investment of the investors."

A power to vary does not exist as a result of reinvestments that occur outside of
the original investment trust. In Rev. Rul. 81-238, 1981-2 C.B. 248, the sponsor of the
initial investment trust, prior to each semiannual distribution, creates a new investment
trust in which certificate holders can invest their distributions. With regard to each
specific investment trust, neither the trustee nor any other person has a power to vary
the investments of the trust. Certificate holders in the original investment trust may
choose to have all of their distributions invested in the newly-created investment trusts
under an automatic reinvestment plan or may choose to receive cash. Further,
certificate holders may choose to participate in or terminate the reinvestment plan at
any time, may withdraw from the reinvestment plan with respect to particular
distributions, or may withdraw from the reinvestment plan with respect to only some of
the certificates they own. Rev. Rul. 81-238 concludes that the reinvestment plan does

not create a power to vary, because there is no change in, or addition to, the assets of
the original trust and the investment of each certificate holder in the original trust
remains fixed.

Request for Comments

The IRS and the Treasury Department welcome further comments regarding
what additional guidance, if any, is needed regarding modifications of commercial
mortgage loans held by investment trusts. To be most useful, the comments should
also analyze the extent to which the modifications at issue are consistent with existing
case law and administrative pronouncements that govern whether an investment trust is
classified as a trust for federal income tax purposes. Answers to the following questions
would be particularly helpful:

1\.
Is it common business practice to hold commercial mortgage loans
through an investment trust? If so, please describe the structure of an investment trust
that holds commercial mortgage loans. Also, if commercial mortgages are held by a
REMIC through an investment trust, please explain the utility of this structure and its
business purpose.

2\.
Are there fact patterns which are not described in § 1.860G-2(b)(3)(i) and
in which one or more modifications permitted to REMICs under § 1.860G-2(b)(3)(ii)
through (vi) would be consistent with the case law and prior administrative
pronouncements if carried out by an investment trust?

3\.
Are there alternative structures that would be consistent with the case law
and prior administrative pronouncements and would allow the modified mortgage loans

to be held by an investment trust? Are there any changes or additions to the REMIC
rules that would be needed to facilitate these alternative structures?

Interested parties are invited to submit comments on this notice by November 14,
2009. Comments should be submitted in writing, and should include a reference to
Notice 2009-79. Send submissions to: CC:PA:LPD:PR (Notice 2009-79), Room 5203,
Internal Revenue Service, PO Box 7604, Ben Franklin Station, Washington, DC 20044.
Submissions may be hand delivered Monday through Friday between the hours of 8
a.m. and 4 p.m. to CC:PA:LPD:PR (Notice 2009-79), Courier's Desk, Internal Revenue
Service, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC. Alternatively, comments may
be submitted electronically directly to the IRS via the following e-mail address:
Notice.comments@irscounsel.treas.gov. Please include "Notice 2009-79" in the subject
line of any electronic communication. All materials submitted will be available for public
inspection and copying.

## Drafting Information

The principal author of this notice is Pamela Lew of the Office of Associate Chief
Counsel (Financial Institutions & Products). For further information regarding this notice
contact Pamela Lew on (202) 622-3950 (not a toll-free call).

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude