IRS written determination 201426009

us-irs-private-letter-rulings-201426009IRS written determination 201426009Guidance

Private letter rulings and published taxpayer determination letters. Native document type is retained separately; a determination letter is not labeled a private letter ruling. These taxpayer-specific releases cannot be used or cited as precedent under 26 USC 6110(k)(3); applicability and current legal force are not independently certified. Keep repeated UILC subjects attached to one actual numbered document.

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 201426009
Release Date: 6/27/2014
Index Number: 1362.04-00
------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------
Third Party Communication: None
Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Person To Contact:
---------------------, ID No. ----------------
Telephone Number:
--------------------
Refer Reply To:
CC:PSI:B03
PLR-138913-13
Date:
February 24, 2014
X=-------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------
State=--------------------
LLC=------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------
Members=--------------------
------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------
Trust=------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------
D1=--------------------------
D2=------------------

PLR-138913-13
2
D3=------------------------
D4=------------------
D5=--------------------------
Period= -------------------------------------
Dear -----------------:
This letter responds to a letter dated August 30, 2013, and subsequent
correspondence, submitted on behalf of X requesting a ruling under § 1362(f) of the
Internal Revenue Code (Code).
FACTS
The information submitted states that X was incorporated under the laws of State
and made an election to be treated as an S corporation effective D1. X’s S corporation
election was terminated on D2, when stock in X was transferred to LLC, an ineligible
shareholder. In addition, X stock was transferred to Truston D3. X represents that
Trustqualified as a qualified subchapter S trust (“QSST”) under § 1361(d)(3), but its
income beneficiary, who died on D4, failed to make a QSST election. On D5, LLC and
Trusttransferred theX stock they held to eligible shareholders.
X represents that the termination was not motivated by tax avoidance or
retroactive tax planning. X and its shareholders have agreed to make any adjustments
that the Commissioner may require, consistent with the treatment of X as an S
corporation.
Finally, during Period, X made disproportionate distributions to its shareholders.
X represents that under Statelaw, all of X’s stock have identical rights to distribution
and liquidation proceeds. No provision in X’s articles of incorporation, bylaws, or any
other governing instruments altered those rights. X further represents that there is no
agreement, written or oral, that any shareholder would be entitled to a preference
regarding X’s distribution or liquidation proceeds. X represents that it will make
corrective distributions to rectify the disproportionate distributions made during Periodto
its shareholders.
LAW AND ANALYSIS

PLR-138913-13
3
Section 1361(a) provides that the term “S corporation” means, with respect to
any taxable year, a small business corporation for which an election under § 1362(a) is
in effect for such year.
Section 1361(b)(1) defines a “small business corporation” as a domestic
corporation which is not an ineligible corporation and which does not (A) have more
than 100 shareholders, (B) have as a shareholder a person (other than an estate, a
trust described in § 1361(c)(2), or an organization described in § 1361(c)(6)) who is not
an individual, (C) have a nonresident alien as a shareholder, and (D) have more than
one class of stock.
Section 1361(d)(1) provides that a QSST whose beneficiary makes an election
under § 1361(d)(2) will be treated as a trust described in § 1361(c)(2)(A)(i), and the
QSST’s beneficiary will be treated as the owner (for purposes of § 678(a)) of that
portion of the QSST’s S corporation stock to which the election under § 1361(d)(2)
applies. Under § 1361(d)(2)(A), a beneficiary of a QSST may elect to have § 1361(d)
apply. Under § 1361(d)(2)(D), this election will be effective up to 15 days and two
months before the date of the election.
Section 1361(d)(3) provides that for purposes of § 1361(d), the term “qualified
subchapter S trust” means a trust (A) the terms of which require that -- (i) during the life
of the current income beneficiary, there shall be only one income beneficiary of the
trust; (ii) any corpus distributed during the life of the current beneficiary may be
distributed only to such beneficiary; (iii) the income interest of the current income
beneficiary in thetrust shall terminate on the earlier of such beneficiary’s death or the
termination of the trust; and (iv) upon the termination of the trust during the life of the
current income beneficiary, the trust shall distribute all of its assets to that beneficiary;
and (B) all of the income (within the meaning of § 643(b)) of which is distributed (or
required to be distributed) currently to one individual who is a citizen or resident of the
United States.
Section 1362(d)(2)(A) provides that an election under § 1362(a) shall be
terminated whenever (at any time on or after the 1
st
day of the 1
st
taxable year for which
the corporation is an S corporation) such corporation ceases to be a small business
corporation. Section 1362(d)(2)(B) provides that any termination under § 1362(d) shall
be effective on and after the date of cessation.
Section 1362(f) provides that if (1) an election under § 1362(a) by any
corporation (A) was not effective for the taxable year for which made (determined
without regard to § 1362(b)(2)) by reason of a failure to meet the requirements of
§ 1361(b) or to obtain shareholder consents or (B) was terminated under § 1362(d)(2)
or (3), (2) the Secretary determines that the circumstances resulting in the
ineffectiveness or termination were inadvertent, (3) no later than a reasonable period of
time after discovery of the circumstances resulting in the ineffectiveness or termination,

PLR-138913-13
4
steps were taken (A) so that the corporation is a small business corporation or (B) to
acquire the shareholder consents, and (4) the corporation and each person who was a
shareholder of the corporation at any time during the period specified pursuant to
§ 1362(f), agrees to make such adjustments (consistent with the treatment of the
corporation as an S corporation) as may be required by the Secretary with respect to
such period, then, notwithstanding the circumstances resulting in the ineffectiveness or
termination, the corporation will be treated as an S corporation during the period
specified by the Secretary.
Section1.1361-1(l)(1) of the Income Tax Regulations provides, in part, that a
corporation that has more than one class of stock does not qualify as a small business
corporation. Except as provided in § 1.1361-1(l)(4) (relating to instruments, obligations,
or arrangements treated as a second class of stock), a corporation is treated as having
only one class of stock if all outstanding shares of stock of the corporation confer
identical rights to distribution and liquidation proceeds. Differences in voting stock
among shares of stock of a corporation are disregarded in determining whether a
corporation has more than one class of stock.
Section 1.1361-1(l)(2)(i) provides, in part, that the determination of whether all
outstanding shares of stock confer identical rights to distribution and liquidation
proceeds is made based on the corporate charter, articles of incorporation, bylaws,
applicable state law, and binding agreements relating to distribution and liquidation
proceeds (collectively, the governing provisions). Although a corporation is not treated
as having more than one class of stock so long as the governing provisions provide for
identical distribution and liquidation rights, any distributions (including actual,
constructive, or deemed distributions) thatdiffer in timing or amount are to be given
appropriate tax effect in accordance with the facts and circumstances.
In § 1.1361-1(l)(2)(vi), Example 2 (Distributions that differ in timing), S, a
corporation, has two equal shareholders, A and B. Under S’s bylaws, A and B are
entitled to equal distributions. S distributes $50,000 to A in the current year, but does
not distribute $50,000 to B until one year later. The circumstances indicate that the
difference in timing did not occur by a binding agreement relating to distribution or
liquidation proceeds. The example concludes that under § 1.1361-1(l)(2)(i), the
difference in timing of the distributions to A and B does not cause S to be treated as
having more than one class of stock. However, § 7872 or other recharacterization
principles may apply to determine the appropriate tax consequences.
CONCLUSIONS
Based solely on the facts submitted and the representations made, we conclude
that the termination of X’s S corporation election on D2 was inadvertent within the
meaning of § 1362(f). Pursuant to the provisions of § 1362(f), X will be treated as
continuing to be an S corporation from D2 and thereafter, provided X’s S corporation

PLR-138913-13
5
election was valid and provided that the election was not otherwise terminated under
§ 1362(d). In addition, from D2 through D5, Membersshall be treated as the owners of
X stock in proportion to their ownership interests in LLC, and Trustwill be treated as a
QSST during the period for which it held X stock.
In addition, basedsolely on the facts submitted and representations made, we
conclude that because X has identical distribution and liquidation rights under its
governing provisions, the difference in timing between X’s disproportionate distributions
and the corrective distributions that X will make do not cause X to be treated as having
more than one class of stock for purposes of § 1361(b)(1)(D). However, X’s
disproportionate distributions and corrective distributions must be given appropriate tax
effect. Under these circumstances, we conclude that X’s S corporation election did not
terminate because of the disproportionate distributions and the corrective distributions
that X will make. This ruling is contingent upon X making corrective distributions so that
each shareholder receives distributions proportionate to their interests in X from D1 and
thereafter, within 120 days of the date of this letter. Failure to make such corrective
distributions will render this ruling void.
Except as specifically ruled above, we express no opinion concerning the federal
tax consequences of the transactions described above under any other provisions of the
Code. Specifically, we express or imply no opinion regarding X’s eligibility to be an S
corporation or Trust’s eligibility to be a QSST.
This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer that requested it. Section 6110(k)(3)
provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
Pursuant to a power of attorney on file, we are sending a copy of this letter to X’s
authorized representative.

PLR-138913-13
6
The rulings contained in this letter are based upon information and
representations submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury
statement executed by an appropriate party. While this office has not verifiedany of the
material submitted in support of the rulings requested, it is subject to verification on
examination.
Sincerely,
/s/
Mary Beth Carchia
Senior Technician Reviewer, Branch 3
Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs & Special Industries)
Enclosures (2)
Copy of this letter
Copy for § 6110 purposes

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.